Andrew Marrero
P Corpus Christi Hooks| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | AASTL | 41 | 0 | 53 | 6.28 | 4.57 | 27.0% | 12.4% | — | K 21.9% · BB 13.7% · FIP 4.82 |
| 2025 | 25 | AASTL | 24 | 0 | 35 | 5.19 | 5.03 | 27.8% | 18.9% | — | K 22.5% · BB 20.8% · FIP 5.60 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX3 levels | 25 | 1 | 31 | 6.97 | 4.52 | 29.1% | 11.3% | — | K 23.8% · BB 11.8% · FIP 5.08 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBHOU | — | — | 0 | 5.20 | 5.20 | 22.1% | 14.3% | — | |
| 2028PROJ36% MLB | 28 | MLBHOU | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5.16 | 5.20 | 22.1% | 14.0% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | 13 | 0 | 13 | 75 | 22 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.7% | 22.0% | -0.3% | 1.9% | 10.12 | 5.09 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | A RAW | Palm Beach Cardinals | 13 | 0 | 13 | 75 | 22 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.3% | 18.7% | 10.7% | 1.3% | 10.12 | 3.92 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | 32 | 0 | 35 | 146 | 55 | 21 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 27.9% | 17.0% | 10.9% | 1.0% | 1.27 | 3.45 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A RAW | Palm Beach Cardinals | 32 | 0 | 35 | 146 | 55 | 21 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 37.7% | 14.4% | 23.3% | 0.7% | 1.27 | 2.14 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ MLE | Peoria Chiefs | 38 | 0 | 60 | 269 | 85 | 36 | 9 | 0% | 1.6 | 24.3% | 15.4% | 8.9% | 3.8% | 4.05 | 5.10 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ RAW | Peoria Chiefs | 38 | 0 | 60 | 269 | 85 | 36 | 9 | 0% | 1.6 | 31.6% | 13.4% | 18.2% | 3.3% | 4.05 | 4.02 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Springfield Cardinals | 41 | 0 | 53 | 233 | 63 | 29 | 9 | 0% | 1.3 | 21.9% | 13.7% | 8.2% | 3.3% | 6.28 | 4.82 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Springfield Cardinals | 41 | 0 | 53 | 233 | 63 | 29 | 9 | 0% | 1.3 | 21.9% | 13.7% | 8.2% | 3.3% | 6.28 | 4.82 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA RAW | Springfield Cardinals | 41 | 0 | 53 | 233 | 63 | 29 | 9 | 0% | 1.3 | 27.0% | 12.4% | 14.6% | 3.9% | 6.28 | 4.57 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Springfield Cardinals | 24 | 0 | 35 | 169 | 47 | 32 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.5% | 20.8% | 1.7% | 3.2% | 5.19 | 5.60 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Springfield Cardinals | 24 | 0 | 35 | 169 | 47 | 32 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.5% | 20.8% | 1.7% | 3.2% | 5.19 | 5.60 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA RAW | Springfield Cardinals | 24 | 0 | 35 | 169 | 47 | 32 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 27.8% | 18.9% | 8.9% | 3.0% | 5.19 | 5.03 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 25 | 1 | 31 | 141 | 41 | 16 | 6 | 4% | 1.2 | 23.8% | 11.8% | 12.0% | 4.5% | 6.97 | 5.08 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 25 | 1 | 31 | 141 | 41 | 16 | 6 | 4% | 1.2 | 23.8% | 11.8% | 12.0% | 4.5% | 6.97 | 5.08 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 25 | 1 | 31 | 141 | 41 | 16 | 6 | 4% | 1.2 | 29.1% | 11.3% | 17.7% | 4.3% | 6.97 | 4.52 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | HOU | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | 14.3% | 7.8% | 3.2% | 5.20 | 5.20 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | HOU | 15 | 0 | 16 | 68 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 14.0% | 8.1% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 5.20 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | HOU | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.1% | 14.0% | 8.1% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 5.20 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.1% | 14.0% | 8.1% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 4.82 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 171 | 103 | 34 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 14.0% | 8.1% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 4.82 | -0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 173 | 1 | 227 | 1033 | 245 | 166 | 33 | 1% | 1.3 | 23.7% | 16.1% | 7.6% | 3.2% | 5.07 | 4.88 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 152 | 1 | 200 | 909 | 216 | 146 | 29 | 1% | 1.3 | 23.7% | 16.1% | 7.6% | 3.2% | 5.07 | 4.88 | -1.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AACorpus Christi Hooks · 12 IPFIP 5.21 → 6.28 (+1.07)K% 23.2% → 18.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.21% | — | ×0.810 | 18.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.93% | — | ×1.100 | 9.82% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.36% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 6.43% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.21 → 6.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Astros · 13 IPFIP 1.93 → 3.84 (+1.91)K% 42.6% → 29.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 42.59% | — | ×0.680 | 28.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.11% | — | ×1.250 | 13.89% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.85% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.59% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.93 → 3.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Asheville Tourists · 6 IPFIP 7.32 → 8.83 (+1.51)K% 16.1% → 12.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.13% | — | ×0.770 | 12.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.13% | — | ×1.150 | 18.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.45% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 8.06% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 7.32 → 8.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AASpringfield Cardinals · 35 IPFIP 4.77 → 5.60 (+0.83)K% 27.8% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.81% | — | ×0.810 | 22.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.93% | — | ×1.100 | 20.83% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.96% | ÷1.105 | ×1.200 | 3.21% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 4.77 → 5.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AASpringfield Cardinals · 53 IPFIP 4.51 → 4.82 (+0.31)K% 27.0% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.04% | — | ×0.810 | 21.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.45% | — | ×1.100 | 13.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.86% | ÷1.386 | ×1.200 | 3.35% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 177).
Result: FIP 4.51 → 4.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Peoria Chiefs · 60 IPFIP 3.96 → 5.10 (+1.13)K% 31.6% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.60% | — | ×0.770 | 24.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.38% | — | ×1.150 | 15.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.35% | ÷1.093 | ×1.250 | 3.83% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 119).
Result: FIP 3.96 → 5.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 APalm Beach Cardinals · 35 IPFIP 2.12 → 3.45 (+1.33)K% 37.7% → 27.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.67% | — | ×0.740 | 27.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.38% | — | ×1.180 | 16.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.68% | ÷0.880 | ×1.300 | 1.01% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 2.12 → 3.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 APalm Beach Cardinals · 13 IPFIP 3.72 → 5.09 (+1.37)K% 29.3% → 21.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.33% | — | ×0.740 | 21.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.67% | — | ×1.180 | 22.03% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.33% | ÷0.924 | ×1.300 | 1.88% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 3.72 → 5.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).