Trey Gregory-Alford
P Rancho Cucamonga Quakes| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19 | MIX2 levels | 18 | 16 | 79 | 2.86 | 2.96 | 20.7% | 10.0% | — | K 14.4% · BB 12.3% · FIP 3.97 |
| 2026 | 20 | ALAA | 22 | 21 | 99 | 4.29 | 3.53 | 22.7% | 10.4% | — | K 16.8% · BB 12.3% · FIP 4.54 |
| 2027PROJ | 21 | MLBLAA | — | — | 0 | 5.10 | 5.10 | 17.5% | 12.5% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 22 | MLBLAA | 7 | 7 | 36 | 4.88 | 4.77 | 19.3% | 11.0% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ73% MLB | 23 | MLBLAA | 10 | 10 | 54 | 4.67 | 4.55 | 20.4% | 10.1% | 0.6 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 16 | 79 | 329 | 68 | 33 | 2 | 89% | 4.4 | 14.4% | 12.3% | 2.2% | 1.0% | 2.86 | 3.97 | — |
| 2025 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 16 | 79 | 329 | 68 | 33 | 2 | 89% | 4.4 | 14.4% | 12.3% | 2.2% | 1.0% | 2.86 | 3.97 | — |
| 2025 | 19 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 18 | 16 | 79 | 329 | 68 | 33 | 2 | 89% | 4.4 | 20.7% | 10.0% | 10.6% | 0.6% | 2.86 | 2.96 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 22 | 21 | 99 | 441 | 100 | 46 | 8 | 95% | 4.5 | 16.8% | 12.3% | 4.5% | 2.4% | 4.29 | 4.54 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 22 | 21 | 99 | 441 | 100 | 46 | 8 | 95% | 4.5 | 16.8% | 12.3% | 4.5% | 2.4% | 4.29 | 4.54 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 22 | 21 | 99 | 441 | 100 | 46 | 8 | 95% | 4.5 | 22.7% | 10.4% | 12.2% | 1.8% | 4.29 | 3.53 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB | LAA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.5% | 12.5% | 5.1% | 2.8% | 5.10 | 5.10 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | LAA | 15 | 15 | 74 | 312 | 60 | 34 | 9 | 100% | 4.9 | 19.3% | 11.0% | 8.3% | 2.7% | 4.85 | 4.74 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB MLE | LAA | 14 | 14 | 74 | 312 | 64 | 31 | 8 | 100% | 5.3 | 20.4% | 10.1% | 10.3% | 2.7% | 4.64 | 4.52 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB MLE | LAA | 13 | 13 | 74 | 312 | 66 | 30 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.0% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 2.7% | 4.48 | 4.39 | +0.9 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB MLE | LAA | 12 | 12 | 68 | 285 | 61 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 5.6 | 21.4% | 9.2% | 12.2% | 2.7% | 4.38 | 4.31 | +0.9 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAA | 11 | 11 | 68 | 285 | 62 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.6% | 9.2% | 12.5% | 2.7% | 4.32 | 4.29 | +0.9 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAA | 11 | 11 | 66 | 279 | 60 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.6% | 9.2% | 12.4% | 2.7% | 4.32 | 4.33 | +0.8 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAA | 10 | 10 | 63 | 266 | 57 | 25 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 21.5% | 9.4% | 12.1% | 2.8% | 4.37 | 4.41 | +0.7 |
| 2035 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAA | 10 | 10 | 58 | 247 | 52 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.3% | 9.6% | 11.7% | 3.0% | 4.47 | 4.54 | +0.6 |
| 2036 | 30 | MLB MLE | LAA | 9 | 9 | 53 | 224 | 47 | 22 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.9% | 9.9% | 11.0% | 3.2% | 4.62 | 4.72 | +0.4 |
| 2037 | 31 | MLB MLE | LAA | 8 | 8 | 48 | 201 | 41 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.5% | 10.3% | 10.2% | 3.4% | 4.80 | 4.92 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | LAA | 7 | 7 | 36 | 152 | 29 | 17 | 4 | 100% | 5.1 | 19.3% | 11.0% | 8.3% | 2.8% | 4.88 | 4.77 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 54 | 228 | 47 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 5.4 | 20.4% | 10.1% | 10.3% | 2.8% | 4.67 | 4.55 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB CTX | LAA | 11 | 11 | 61 | 258 | 54 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.0% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 2.7% | 4.51 | 4.42 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 54 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.4% | 9.2% | 12.2% | 2.7% | 4.41 | 4.34 | +0.8 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 62 | 262 | 57 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.6% | 9.2% | 12.5% | 2.7% | 4.35 | 4.32 | +0.8 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 56 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.6% | 9.2% | 12.4% | 2.8% | 4.35 | 4.36 | +0.8 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 59 | 249 | 54 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.5% | 9.4% | 12.1% | 2.9% | 4.40 | 4.44 | +0.7 |
| 2035 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAA | 9 | 9 | 55 | 232 | 49 | 22 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.3% | 9.6% | 11.7% | 3.0% | 4.50 | 4.57 | +0.6 |
| 2036 | 30 | MLB CTX | LAA | 8 | 8 | 50 | 211 | 44 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.9% | 9.9% | 11.0% | 3.2% | 4.65 | 4.75 | +0.4 |
| 2037 | 31 | MLB CTX | LAA | 8 | 8 | 45 | 190 | 39 | 19 | 7 | 100% | 5.6 | 20.5% | 10.3% | 10.2% | 3.5% | 4.84 | 4.96 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 94 | 94 | 544 | 2298 | 484 | 222 | 67 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.1% | 9.7% | 11.4% | 2.9% | 4.53 | 4.14 | +8.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 178 | 82 | 25 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.1% | 9.7% | 11.4% | 2.9% | 4.53 | 4.14 | +3.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 40 | 37 | 177 | 770 | 121 | 95 | 14 | 92% | 4.4 | 15.8% | 12.3% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 3.65 | 4.29 | +6.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 45 | 42 | 200 | 868 | 137 | 107 | 15 | 92% | 4.4 | 15.8% | 12.3% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 3.65 | 4.29 | +2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 99 IPFIP 3.50 → 4.54 (+1.03)K% 22.7% → 16.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.68% | — | ×0.740 | 16.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.43% | — | ×1.180 | 12.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.81% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.36% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.50 → 4.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Angels · 53 IPFIP 2.91 → 4.07 (+1.16)K% 21.4% → 14.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.43% | — | ×0.680 | 14.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.93% | — | ×1.250 | 11.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.89% | ÷0.873 | ×1.400 | 1.43% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 75).
Result: FIP 2.91 → 4.07, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AInland Empire 66ers · 25 IPFIP 3.06 → 3.76 (+0.70)K% 19.0% → 14.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.05% | — | ×0.740 | 14.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.38% | — | ×1.180 | 14.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.036 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 3.06 → 3.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.6 | 65 | 20.6% | 10.0% | 1.10 | 4.58 |
| Dan Miceli ('06) | 3.5 | 64 | 20.6% | 10.1% | 1.19 | 4.48 |
| Stan Belinda ('00) | 3.4 | 61 | 21.3% | 9.9% | 1.13 | 4.12 |
| Kevin Gregg ('15) | 3.6 | 65 | 21.0% | 10.5% | 0.97 | 4.24 |
| Jerry Don Gleaton ('79-'92, 2 WAR*) | 2.2 | 64 | 19.4%* | 10.2%* | 1.05* | 4.44* |
| Frank DiPino ('81-'93, 3 WAR*) | 3.5 | 78 | 22.5%* | 9.0%* | 1.00* | 4.44* |
| Rich Rodriguez ('90-'03, 3 WAR*) | 3.2 | 64 | 17.3%* | 9.3%* | 1.05* | 4.00* |