Jake Madden
P Spokane Indians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 21 | ACOL | 20 | 20 | 79 | 5.90 | 4.70 | 21.4% | 12.9% | — | K 15.9% · BB 15.2% · FIP 5.46 | |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 0 | 51 | 3.71 | 3.45 | 19.2% | 11.6% | — | K 14.1% · BB 15.2% · FIP 4.57 | |
| 2025 | 23 | A+COL | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 28.6% | 14.3% | — | K 28.6% · BB 14.3% · FIP 2.50 | |
| 2026 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBCOL | — | — | 0 | 4.77 | 4.77 | 21.5% | 11.6% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBCOL | 9 | 0 | 9 | 4.71 | 4.70 | 21.9% | 11.3% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 20 | 20 | 79 | 373 | 80 | 48 | 11 | 100% | 4.0 | 15.9% | 15.2% | 0.7% | 3.2% | 5.90 | 5.46 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | 20 | 20 | 79 | 373 | 80 | 48 | 11 | 100% | 4.0 | 21.4% | 12.9% | 8.6% | 2.9% | 5.90 | 4.70 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 51 | 224 | 43 | 26 | 2 | 0% | 1.5 | 14.1% | 15.2% | -1.1% | 1.3% | 3.71 | 4.57 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 51 | 224 | 43 | 26 | 2 | 0% | 1.5 | 14.1% | 15.2% | -1.1% | 1.3% | 3.71 | 4.57 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 0 | 51 | 224 | 43 | 26 | 2 | 0% | 1.5 | 19.2% | 11.6% | 7.6% | 0.9% | 3.71 | 3.45 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Spokane Indians | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 28.6% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 2.50 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Spokane Indians | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 28.6% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 2.50 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ RAW | Spokane Indians | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 28.6% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 2.55 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | COL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.5% | 11.6% | 9.9% | 3.0% | 4.77 | 4.77 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | COL | 20 | 0 | 21 | 89 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.9% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.70 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | COL | 9 | 0 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.9% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.70 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 9 | 0 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.9% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.32 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 176 | 88 | 22 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.9% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.32 | +0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 55 | 20 | 134 | 611 | 95 | 93 | 15 | 36% | 2.4 | 15.5% | 15.2% | 0.3% | 2.5% | 4.90 | 5.06 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 82 | 30 | 200 | 912 | 142 | 138 | 22 | 36% | 2.4 | 15.5% | 15.2% | 0.3% | 2.5% | 4.90 | 5.06 | -0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AFresno Grizzlies · 44 IPFIP 3.69 → 4.57 (+0.88)K% 19.1% → 14.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.07% | — | ×0.740 | 14.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.89% | — | ×1.180 | 15.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.03% | ÷1.002 | ×1.300 | 1.34% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.69 → 4.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Rockies · 7 IPFIP 1.83 → 2.48 (+0.65)K% 20.0% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.680 | 13.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.33% | — | ×1.250 | 4.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.044 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 1.83 → 2.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AFresno Grizzlies · 79 IPFIP 4.54 → 5.46 (+0.92)K% 21.4% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.45% | — | ×0.740 | 15.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.87% | — | ×1.180 | 15.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.95% | ÷1.186 | ×1.300 | 3.23% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 4.54 → 5.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).