Gavin Turley
OF Stockton Ports| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21 | AOAK | 125 | .243/.341/.430 | 4 | 0 | 54 | — | .179/.252/.312 |
| 2026 | 22 | A+/AOAK | 382 | .233/.354/.415 | 15 | 4 | 54 | — | .173/.267/.302 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBOAK | 489 | .200/.279/.338 | 13 | 8 | 75 | -0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 24 | MLBOAK | 94 | .210/.289/.360 | 3 | 2 | 80 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBOAK | 162 | .214/.292/.369 | 5 | 3 | 83 | -0.0 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 125 | 107 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 243 | 341 | 430 | 771 | 187 | 310 | 27 | 11 | 340 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 30 | 27 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 111 | 200 | 148 | 348 | 37 | 200 | 40 | 7 | 174 | -29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 352 | 291 | 71 | 10 | 1 | 15 | 51 | 110 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 244 | 368 | 440 | 808 | 196 | 329 | 31 | 14 | 359 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 125 | 112 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 46 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 179 | 252 | 312 | 565 | 134 | 257 | 37 | 7 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 30 | 28 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 107 | 167 | 143 | 310 | 36 | 176 | 50 | 3 | 125 | -29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 352 | 307 | 55 | 7 | 1 | 11 | 35 | 150 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 179 | 276 | 316 | 592 | 137 | 279 | 43 | 10 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 125 | 112 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 46 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 179 | 252 | 312 | 565 | 134 | 262 | 37 | 7 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Stockton Ports | — | 125 | 107 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 243 | 341 | 430 | 771 | 187 | 310 | 27 | 11 | 340 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 382 | 335 | 57 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 36 | 165 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 170 | 265 | 299 | 563 | 128 | 282 | 43 | 9 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 382 | 318 | 74 | 11 | 1 | 15 | 53 | 122 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 233 | 354 | 415 | 770 | 182 | 319 | 32 | 14 | 345 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 125 | 113 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 46 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 177 | 252 | 310 | 562 | 133 | 257 | 37 | 7 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 382 | 336 | 57 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 36 | 165 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 170 | 265 | 298 | 562 | 128 | 271 | 43 | 9 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 125 | 113 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 46 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 177 | 252 | 310 | 562 | 133 | 257 | 37 | 7 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 382 | 336 | 57 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 36 | 165 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 170 | 265 | 298 | 562 | 128 | 271 | 43 | 9 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 489 | 438 | 87 | 16 | 2 | 13 | 42 | 161 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 200 | 279 | 338 | 617 | 138 | 278 | 33 | 9 | 278 | 75 | -15 | +0 | -1 | -3 | +11 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | OAK | 30% | 314 | 280 | 57 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 27 | 101 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 205 | 284 | 352 | 636 | 147 | 280 | 32 | 9 | 286 | 80 | -8 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +7 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 44% | 366 | 327 | 69 | 12 | 2 | 12 | 32 | 116 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 209 | 288 | 361 | 649 | 153 | 281 | 32 | 9 | 291 | 83 | -7 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +8 | -0.1 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 51% | 397 | 355 | 75 | 13 | 2 | 13 | 34 | 124 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 211 | 290 | 368 | 658 | 156 | 281 | 31 | 9 | 294 | 85 | -7 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +9 | -0.0 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 52% | 409 | 365 | 78 | 14 | 2 | 13 | 36 | 127 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 212 | 291 | 367 | 658 | 155 | 281 | 31 | 9 | 294 | 85 | -7 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +9 | -0.0 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | OAK | 53% | 412 | 368 | 78 | 14 | 2 | 13 | 36 | 127 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 212 | 290 | 365 | 655 | 153 | 281 | 31 | 9 | 293 | 85 | -8 | +0 | -1 | -2 | +9 | -0.2 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | OAK | 53% | 406 | 364 | 76 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 35 | 126 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 209 | 287 | 358 | 645 | 149 | 279 | 31 | 9 | 289 | 82 | -9 | +0 | -1 | -2 | +9 | -0.3 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | OAK | 56% | 396 | 355 | 73 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 34 | 124 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 206 | 283 | 350 | 634 | 144 | 277 | 31 | 9 | 285 | 79 | -10 | +0 | -2 | -2 | +9 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | OAK | 30% | 94 | 85 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 210 | 289 | 360 | 648 | 149 | 289 | 32 | 9 | 291 | 80 | -2 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | OAK | 44% | 162 | 145 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 51 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 214 | 292 | 369 | 662 | 155 | 290 | 31 | 9 | 296 | 83 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.0 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 51% | 201 | 180 | 39 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 63 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 217 | 295 | 376 | 670 | 159 | 291 | 31 | 8 | 299 | 85 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +4 | 0.0 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 52% | 214 | 190 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 19 | 66 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 217 | 295 | 375 | 670 | 158 | 291 | 31 | 9 | 299 | 85 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +5 | 0.0 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | OAK | 53% | 220 | 196 | 43 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 19 | 68 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 217 | 295 | 373 | 667 | 155 | 290 | 31 | 9 | 298 | 85 | -4 | +0 | -0 | -1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | OAK | 53% | 213 | 191 | 41 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 66 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 215 | 292 | 366 | 658 | 151 | 289 | 31 | 8 | 294 | 82 | -5 | +0 | -1 | -1 | +5 | -0.2 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | OAK | 56% | 224 | 201 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 70 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 212 | 288 | 358 | 646 | 146 | 286 | 31 | 8 | 290 | 79 | -6 | -0 | -1 | -1 | +5 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1328 | 1188 | 255 | 49 | 6 | 40 | 114 | 414 | 15 | 24 | 8 | 215 | 292 | 367 | 659 | 152 | 291 | 31 | 9 | 296 | 78 | -27 | +2 | -2 | -8 | +29 | -0.7 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 581 | 125 | 24 | 3 | 20 | 56 | 203 | 7 | 12 | 4 | 215 | 291 | 370 | 662 | 155 | 291 | 31 | 9 | 296 | 78 | -13 | +1 | -1 | -4 | +14 | -0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3417 | 3048 | 621 | 111 | 14 | 104 | 297 | 1125 | 43 | 57 | 23 | 204 | 284 | 352 | 635 | 148 | 281 | 33 | 9 | 284 | 78 | -62 | +3 | -4 | -17 | +63 | -1.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 580 | 119 | 21 | 3 | 20 | 56 | 214 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 205 | 284 | 355 | 639 | 150 | 283 | 33 | 9 | 284 | 78 | -14 | +1 | -1 | -4 | +14 | -0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AStockton Ports · 352 PAwOBA .354 → .259 (−95)K% 31.2% → 42.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.25% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 42.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 9.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.70% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 1.32% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.966 | ×0.990 | 21.86% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.966 | ×0.990 | 4.38% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.966 | ×0.990 | 0.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 6.56% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.966.
Result: wOBA .354 → .259; ISO .196 → .140; BABIP .329 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 30 PAwOBA .170 → .125 (−46)K% 40.0% → 50.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 40.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 50.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 4.72% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.33% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 2.63% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.998 | 12.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | — | ×0.998 | 5.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .170 → .125; ISO .037 → .025; BABIP .200 → .176. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AStockton Ports · 125 PAwOBA .337 → .248 (−89)K% 27.2% → 36.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.20% | ÷1.011 | ×1.360 | — | — | 36.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.20% | ÷1.029 | ×0.690 | — | — | 7.51% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.60% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.25% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.18% | ÷1.003 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | — | 16.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.96% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | — | 8.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.48% | ÷1.113 | ×0.800 | — | — | 3.94% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 101, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .337 → .248; ISO .187 → .131; BABIP .310 → .257. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).