Blake Money
P Chesapeake Baysox| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 6 | 1 | 10 | 3.72 | 0.82 | 26.8% | 0.0% | — | K 26.8% · BB 0.0% · FIP 0.83 | |
| 2024 | 22 | ABAL | 25 | 14 | 103 | 3.15 | 2.40 | 28.0% | 5.9% | — | K 20.7% · BB 6.9% · FIP 3.46 | |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 18 | 121 | 3.93 | 3.37 | 29.8% | 8.4% | — | K 23.6% · BB 9.5% · FIP 4.00 | |
| 2026 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBBAL | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4.11 | 4.11 | 24.1% | 8.1% | 0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBBAL | 9 | 9 | 62 | 4.18 | 4.17 | 24.1% | 8.0% | 1.0 | ||
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 27 | MLBBAL | 11 | 11 | 78 | 4.22 | 4.23 | 23.9% | 8.0% | 1.2 | ||
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 1 | 10 | 41 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 1.6 | 26.8% | 0.0% | 26.8% | 0.0% | 3.72 | 0.83 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 6 | 1 | 10 | 41 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 1.6 | 26.8% | 0.0% | 26.8% | 0.0% | 3.72 | 0.82 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Delmarva Shorebirds | 25 | 14 | 103 | 425 | 119 | 25 | 7 | 56% | 4.1 | 20.7% | 6.9% | 13.8% | 2.2% | 3.15 | 3.46 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Delmarva Shorebirds | 25 | 14 | 103 | 425 | 119 | 25 | 7 | 56% | 4.1 | 20.7% | 6.9% | 13.8% | 2.2% | 3.15 | 3.46 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A RAW | Delmarva Shorebirds | 25 | 14 | 103 | 425 | 119 | 25 | 7 | 56% | 4.1 | 28.0% | 5.9% | 22.1% | 1.6% | 3.15 | 2.40 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 18 | 121 | 510 | 152 | 43 | 16 | 69% | 4.7 | 23.6% | 9.5% | 14.2% | 3.1% | 3.93 | 4.00 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 18 | 121 | 510 | 152 | 43 | 16 | 69% | 4.7 | 23.6% | 9.5% | 14.2% | 3.1% | 3.93 | 4.00 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 18 | 121 | 510 | 152 | 43 | 16 | 69% | 4.7 | 29.8% | 8.4% | 21.4% | 3.1% | 3.93 | 3.37 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | BAL | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 3.0 | 24.1% | 8.1% | 16.0% | 3.0% | 4.11 | 4.11 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | BAL | 20 | 20 | 141 | 597 | 144 | 48 | 18 | 100% | 7.1 | 24.1% | 8.0% | 16.1% | 3.0% | 4.11 | 4.10 | +2.2 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | BAL | 17 | 17 | 123 | 521 | 125 | 42 | 16 | 100% | 7.3 | 23.9% | 8.0% | 15.9% | 3.0% | 4.14 | 4.15 | +1.8 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | BAL | 16 | 16 | 116 | 491 | 116 | 40 | 15 | 100% | 7.3 | 23.7% | 8.2% | 15.5% | 3.1% | 4.20 | 4.24 | +1.6 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | BAL | 15 | 15 | 108 | 457 | 107 | 38 | 15 | 100% | 7.2 | 23.4% | 8.4% | 15.0% | 3.3% | 4.30 | 4.37 | +1.3 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | BAL | 14 | 14 | 99 | 417 | 96 | 36 | 15 | 100% | 7.0 | 23.1% | 8.7% | 14.4% | 3.5% | 4.45 | 4.54 | +1.0 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB MLE | BAL | 12 | 12 | 88 | 373 | 85 | 34 | 14 | 100% | 7.4 | 22.7% | 9.0% | 13.7% | 3.7% | 4.63 | 4.75 | +0.7 |
| 2034 | 32 | MLB MLE | BAL | 11 | 11 | 78 | 327 | 73 | 31 | 13 | 100% | 7.0 | 22.2% | 9.4% | 12.8% | 4.0% | 4.84 | 4.97 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 33 | MLB MLE | BAL | 9 | 9 | 67 | 282 | 61 | 28 | 12 | 100% | 7.4 | 21.7% | 9.9% | 11.9% | 4.2% | 5.07 | 5.22 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | BAL | 9 | 9 | 62 | 262 | 63 | 21 | 8 | 100% | 6.9 | 24.1% | 8.0% | 16.1% | 3.1% | 4.18 | 4.17 | +1.0 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | BAL | 11 | 11 | 78 | 329 | 79 | 26 | 10 | 100% | 7.1 | 23.9% | 8.0% | 15.9% | 3.2% | 4.22 | 4.23 | +1.2 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | BAL | 12 | 12 | 88 | 372 | 88 | 30 | 12 | 100% | 7.3 | 23.7% | 8.2% | 15.5% | 3.3% | 4.28 | 4.32 | +1.2 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | BAL | 12 | 12 | 88 | 372 | 87 | 31 | 13 | 100% | 7.3 | 23.4% | 8.4% | 15.0% | 3.4% | 4.38 | 4.45 | +1.1 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | BAL | 12 | 12 | 85 | 359 | 83 | 31 | 13 | 100% | 7.1 | 23.1% | 8.7% | 14.4% | 3.6% | 4.54 | 4.63 | +0.8 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB CTX | BAL | 11 | 11 | 78 | 329 | 75 | 30 | 13 | 100% | 7.1 | 22.7% | 9.0% | 13.7% | 3.9% | 4.72 | 4.84 | +0.6 |
| 2034 | 32 | MLB CTX | BAL | 10 | 10 | 70 | 296 | 66 | 28 | 12 | 100% | 7.0 | 22.2% | 9.4% | 12.8% | 4.1% | 4.94 | 5.07 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 33 | MLB CTX | BAL | 9 | 9 | 62 | 262 | 57 | 26 | 12 | 100% | 6.9 | 21.7% | 9.9% | 11.9% | 4.4% | 5.17 | 5.32 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 86 | 86 | 611 | 2582 | 597 | 223 | 93 | 100% | 7.1 | 23.1% | 8.7% | 14.5% | 3.6% | 4.53 | 4.23 | +8.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 28 | 28 | 200 | 844 | 195 | 73 | 30 | 100% | 7.1 | 23.1% | 8.7% | 14.5% | 3.6% | 4.53 | 4.23 | +2.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 57 | 33 | 234 | 976 | 220 | 78 | 25 | 58% | 4.1 | 22.5% | 8.0% | 14.5% | 2.6% | 3.58 | 3.63 | +9.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 49 | 28 | 200 | 834 | 188 | 66 | 22 | 58% | 4.1 | 22.5% | 8.0% | 14.5% | 2.6% | 3.58 | 3.63 | +2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAChesapeake Baysox · 68 IPFIP 3.36 → 3.89 (+0.53)K% 30.3% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.31% | — | ×0.810 | 24.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.71% | — | ×1.100 | 9.58% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.14% | ÷1.248 | ×1.200 | 3.01% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 150).
Result: FIP 3.36 → 3.89, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 53 IPFIP 3.38 → 4.13 (+0.75)K% 29.1% → 22.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.15% | — | ×0.770 | 22.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.07% | — | ×1.150 | 9.28% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.14% | ÷1.229 | ×1.250 | 3.19% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).
Result: FIP 3.38 → 4.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ADelmarva Shorebirds · 103 IPFIP 2.38 → 3.46 (+1.08)K% 28.0% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.00% | — | ×0.740 | 20.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.88% | — | ×1.180 | 6.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.65% | ÷0.952 | ×1.300 | 2.25% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 2.38 → 3.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ADelmarva Shorebirds · 8 IPFIP 0.99 → 1.54 (+0.55)K% 25.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.740 | 18.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.180 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.020 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 0.99 → 1.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.8 | 107 | 23.4% | 8.5% | 1.29 | 4.35 |
| Bud Norris ('18) | 6.1 | 122 | 21.7% | 9.1% | 1.15 | 4.45 |
| Mark Leiter ('90-'01, 5 WAR*) | 5.9 | 118 | 20.7%* | 7.8%* | 1.36* | 4.61* |
| Bob Johnson ('69-'77, 6 WAR*) | 3.5 | 115 | 23.4%* | 8.9%* | 1.49* | 4.12* |
| Frankie Montas ('25) | 3.9 | 98 | 23.6% | 8.2% | 1.20 | 4.20 |
| Scott Sanders ('99) | 3.4 | 97 | 21.2% | 9.3% | 1.23 | 4.86 |
| Chuck Cary ('85-'93, 3 WAR*) | 2.1 | 68 | 24.6%* | 8.7%* | 1.45* | 4.41* |