Anderson Alvarez
P DSL Tampa Bay| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17 | ROKDSL Tampa Bay | 10 | 10 | 39 | 3.23 | 3.64 | 15.5% | 9.3% | — | K 10.6% · BB 11.6% · FIP 4.69 |
| 2026 | 18 | ROKDSL Tampa Bay | 12 | 11 | 51 | 4.91 | 4.83 | 17.7% | 11.5% | — | K 12.0% · BB 14.4% · FIP 6.29 |
| 2027PROJ | 19 | MLB— | — | — | 0 | 5.38 | 5.38 | 16.9% | 13.1% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 20 | MLB— | 4 | 4 | 19 | 5.13 | 5.04 | 18.6% | 11.7% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ73% MLB | 21 | MLB— | 6 | 6 | 28 | 4.90 | 4.79 | 19.7% | 10.8% | 0.2 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | 10 | 10 | 39 | 161 | 25 | 15 | 2 | 100% | 3.9 | 10.6% | 11.6% | -1.1% | 1.8% | 3.23 | 4.69 | — |
| 2025 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | 10 | 10 | 39 | 161 | 25 | 15 | 2 | 100% | 3.9 | 10.6% | 11.6% | -1.1% | 1.8% | 3.23 | 4.69 | — |
| 2025 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Tampa Bay | 10 | 10 | 39 | 161 | 25 | 15 | 2 | 100% | 3.9 | 15.5% | 9.3% | 6.2% | 1.2% | 3.23 | 3.64 | — |
| 2026 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | 12 | 11 | 51 | 226 | 40 | 26 | 7 | 92% | 4.3 | 12.0% | 14.4% | -2.3% | 4.3% | 4.91 | 6.29 | — |
| 2026 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | 12 | 11 | 51 | 226 | 40 | 26 | 7 | 92% | 4.3 | 12.0% | 14.4% | -2.3% | 4.3% | 4.91 | 6.29 | — |
| 2026 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Tampa Bay | 12 | 11 | 51 | 226 | 40 | 26 | 7 | 92% | 4.3 | 17.7% | 11.5% | 6.2% | 3.1% | 4.91 | 4.83 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 19 | MLB | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.9% | 13.1% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 5.38 | 5.38 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 20 | MLB MLE | — | 9 | 9 | 39 | 165 | 31 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 4.3 | 18.6% | 11.7% | 6.9% | 3.0% | 5.13 | 5.04 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 21 | MLB MLE | — | 8 | 8 | 39 | 165 | 33 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 4.9 | 19.7% | 10.8% | 8.9% | 2.9% | 4.90 | 4.79 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 22 | MLB MLE | — | 8 | 8 | 40 | 167 | 35 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 5.0 | 21.0% | 9.9% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 4.67 | 4.54 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 23 | MLB MLE | — | 8 | 8 | 40 | 171 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 5.1 | 21.8% | 9.3% | 12.4% | 2.8% | 4.49 | 4.38 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 24 | MLB MLE | — | 7 | 7 | 41 | 172 | 38 | 15 | 5 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.3% | 9.0% | 13.4% | 2.8% | 4.36 | 4.27 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 25 | MLB MLE | — | 7 | 7 | 40 | 169 | 38 | 15 | 5 | 100% | 5.7 | 22.7% | 8.8% | 14.0% | 2.8% | 4.26 | 4.20 | +0.6 |
| 2034 | 26 | MLB MLE | — | 7 | 7 | 40 | 171 | 39 | 15 | 5 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.9% | 8.7% | 14.2% | 2.8% | 4.21 | 4.18 | +0.6 |
| 2035 | 27 | MLB MLE | — | 7 | 7 | 39 | 166 | 38 | 15 | 5 | 100% | 5.6 | 22.9% | 8.8% | 14.1% | 2.8% | 4.21 | 4.22 | +0.5 |
| 2028 | 20 | MLB CTX | — | 4 | 4 | 19 | 80 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 100% | 4.8 | 18.6% | 11.7% | 6.9% | 3.0% | 5.13 | 5.04 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 21 | MLB CTX | — | 6 | 6 | 28 | 118 | 23 | 13 | 3 | 100% | 4.7 | 19.7% | 10.8% | 8.9% | 2.9% | 4.90 | 4.79 | +0.2 |
| 2030 | 22 | MLB CTX | — | 6 | 6 | 33 | 139 | 29 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.0% | 9.9% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 4.67 | 4.54 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 23 | MLB CTX | — | 7 | 7 | 36 | 152 | 33 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 5.1 | 21.8% | 9.3% | 12.4% | 2.8% | 4.49 | 4.38 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 24 | MLB CTX | — | 7 | 7 | 38 | 160 | 36 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 5.4 | 22.3% | 9.0% | 13.4% | 2.8% | 4.36 | 4.27 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 25 | MLB CTX | — | 6 | 6 | 37 | 156 | 35 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.7% | 8.8% | 14.0% | 2.8% | 4.26 | 4.20 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 26 | MLB CTX | — | 6 | 6 | 38 | 160 | 37 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 6.3 | 22.9% | 8.7% | 14.2% | 2.8% | 4.21 | 4.18 | +0.5 |
| 2035 | 27 | MLB CTX | — | 6 | 6 | 37 | 156 | 36 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.9% | 8.8% | 14.1% | 2.8% | 4.21 | 4.22 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 49 | 49 | 268 | 1133 | 247 | 107 | 32 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.8% | 9.4% | 12.3% | 2.8% | 4.47 | 4.02 | +4.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 37 | 37 | 200 | 844 | 184 | 80 | 24 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.8% | 9.4% | 12.3% | 2.8% | 4.47 | 4.02 | +3.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 22 | 21 | 90 | 387 | 44 | 51 | 13 | 95% | 4.1 | 11.4% | 13.2% | -1.8% | 3.3% | 4.18 | 5.62 | +3.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 49 | 46 | 200 | 857 | 98 | 113 | 28 | 95% | 4.1 | 11.4% | 13.2% | -1.8% | 3.3% | 4.18 | 5.62 | +2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKDSL Tampa Bay · 51 IPFIP 4.76 → 6.29 (+1.52)K% 17.7% → 12.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.70% | — | ×0.680 | 12.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.50% | — | ×1.250 | 14.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.10% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 4.34% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.76 → 6.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKDSL Tampa Bay · 39 IPFIP 3.65 → 4.69 (+1.04)K% 15.5% → 10.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.53% | — | ×0.680 | 10.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.32% | — | ×1.250 | 11.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.24% | ÷0.952 | ×1.400 | 1.83% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.65 → 4.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.8 | 39 | 21.1% | 9.9% | 1.11 | 4.61 |
| Jacob Barnes ('25) | 1.7 | 48 | 22.0% | 9.2% | 1.15 | 4.79 |
| Scott Service ('04) | 2.1 | 46 | 22.2% | 9.9% | 1.23 | 5.04 |
| Buck Farmer ('24) | 2.6 | 51 | 21.6% | 10.5% | 1.24 | 4.71 |
| Mike Munoz ('89-'00, 1 WAR*) | 1.8 | 46 | 17.6%* | 10.2%* | 0.93* | 4.46* |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |
| Tony Fossas ('88-'99, 2 WAR*) | 2.1 | 42 | 21.9%* | 9.3%* | 0.99* | 3.88* |