Hayden Gilliland
C Vancouver Canadians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23 | A+/ATOR | 122 | .200/.328/.350 | 3 | 0 | 37 | — | .151/.244/.274 |
| 2026 | 24 | AA/A+2 orgs | 165 | .250/.378/.441 | 6 | 0 | 73 | — | .187/.293/.311 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBTOR | 215 | .199/.289/.326 | 5 | 3 | 76 | 0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 26 | MLBTOR | 48 | .202/.291/.331 | 1 | 1 | 77 | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ42% MLB | 27 | MLBTOR | 84 | .203/.292/.332 | 2 | 1 | 77 | 0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 20 / POW 45
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ | Vancouver Canadians | — | 83 | 68 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 206 | 333 | 338 | 672 | 132 | 300 | 34 | 16 | 304 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A | Dunedin Blue Jays | — | 39 | 32 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 188 | 316 | 375 | 691 | 188 | 227 | 26 | 15 | 306 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 50 | 44 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 295 | 380 | 568 | 948 | 273 | 370 | 28 | 10 | 413 | 102 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ | Vancouver Canadians | — | 115 | 92 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 228 | 377 | 380 | 758 | 152 | 290 | 24 | 18 | 346 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Vancouver Canadians | — | 83 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 153 | 247 | 264 | 511 | 111 | 264 | 47 | 11 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A MLE | Dunedin Blue Jays | — | 39 | 34 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 147 | 237 | 294 | 531 | 147 | 184 | 36 | 10 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 50 | 46 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 217 | 300 | 391 | 691 | 174 | 324 | 34 | 8 | 319 | 102 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Vancouver Canadians | — | 115 | 98 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 173 | 289 | 276 | 565 | 102 | 239 | 33 | 13 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 122 | 106 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 151 | 244 | 255 | 498 | 104 | 259 | 43 | 11 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 122 | 100 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 328 | 350 | 678 | 150 | 274 | 31 | 16 | 305 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 165 | 144 | 28 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 55 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 194 | 293 | 340 | 633 | 146 | 271 | 33 | 11 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 165 | 136 | 34 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 42 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 250 | 378 | 441 | 819 | 191 | 315 | 25 | 16 | 366 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 122 | 108 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 148 | 244 | 250 | 494 | 102 | 238 | 43 | 11 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 165 | 144 | 28 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 55 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 194 | 293 | 340 | 633 | 146 | 265 | 33 | 11 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 122 | 108 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 148 | 244 | 250 | 494 | 102 | 238 | 43 | 11 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 165 | 144 | 28 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 55 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 194 | 293 | 340 | 633 | 146 | 265 | 33 | 11 | 276 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | TOR | 0% | 215 | 189 | 38 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 62 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 199 | 289 | 326 | 616 | 127 | 263 | 29 | 10 | 280 | 76 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +5 | 0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | TOR | 30% | 160 | 141 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 46 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 201 | 291 | 330 | 621 | 129 | 264 | 29 | 10 | 282 | 77 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +3 | 0.2 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | TOR | 42% | 202 | 178 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 57 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 202 | 291 | 331 | 623 | 129 | 265 | 28 | 10 | 283 | 77 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +4 | 0.3 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | TOR | 48% | 235 | 207 | 43 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 24 | 66 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 203 | 291 | 331 | 621 | 128 | 265 | 28 | 10 | 282 | 77 | -6 | +0 | -1 | +4 | +5 | 0.2 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | TOR | 30% | 48 | 43 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 202 | 291 | 331 | 622 | 129 | 265 | 29 | 10 | 283 | 77 | -1 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | 0.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | TOR | 42% | 84 | 74 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 203 | 292 | 332 | 624 | 129 | 266 | 29 | 11 | 283 | 77 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | 0.1 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | TOR | 48% | 112 | 99 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 203 | 291 | 331 | 623 | 128 | 266 | 29 | 10 | 283 | 77 | -3 | +0 | -0 | +2 | +2 | 0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 244 | 216 | 44 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 70 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 204 | 292 | 329 | 621 | 125 | 270 | 29 | 10 | 283 | 71 | -7 | +1 | -0 | +4 | +5 | 0.3 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 575 | 117 | 24 | 0 | 16 | 67 | 186 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 203 | 292 | 329 | 621 | 125 | 269 | 29 | 10 | 283 | 71 | -18 | +2 | -1 | +12 | +14 | 0.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 984 | 865 | 167 | 34 | 3 | 24 | 101 | 306 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 193 | 284 | 323 | 607 | 129 | 264 | 31 | 10 | 274 | 71 | -19 | +1 | -1 | +12 | +15 | 0.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 571 | 110 | 22 | 2 | 16 | 67 | 202 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 193 | 284 | 322 | 606 | 130 | 263 | 31 | 10 | 274 | 71 | -18 | +1 | -1 | +12 | +14 | 0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Vancouver Canadians · 115 PAwOBA .341 → .258 (−83)K% 24.3% → 32.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.35% | ÷1.000 | ×1.350 | — | — | 32.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 12.68% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.87% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.978 | 0.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.31% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.959 | ×0.978 | 17.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.959 | ×0.978 | 6.08% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.959 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.978 | 3.81% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.959.
Result: wOBA .341 → .258; ISO .152 → .118; BABIP .290 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AATulsa Drillers · 50 PAwOBA .402 → .319 (−82)K% 28.0% → 34.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 34.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 6.99% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.00% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.998 | 1.74% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.998 | 21.42% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | — | ×0.998 | 8.38% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 7.98% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .402 → .319; ISO .273 → .210; BABIP .370 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Vancouver Canadians · 83 PAwOBA .304 → .227 (−77)K% 33.7% → 47.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.73% | ÷0.958 | ×1.350 | — | — | 47.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.66% | ÷1.039 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 10.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.50% | ÷1.022 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.988 | 19.79% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.50% | ÷0.898 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 6.85% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.939 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.00% | ÷0.855 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 4.79% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 71, 1B 104, 2B 80, 3B 88, K 92, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .304 → .227; ISO .132 → .109; BABIP .300 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ADunedin Blue Jays · 39 PAwOBA .306 → .216 (−91)K% 25.6% → 36.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.64% | ÷0.968 | ×1.360 | — | — | 36.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.38% | ÷1.015 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 10.25% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 9.09% | ÷1.006 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.980 | 8.14% |
| Doubles /BIP | 13.64% | ÷1.047 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.980 | 10.59% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.55% | ÷1.284 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 2.77% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 157, 1B 101, 2B 109, 3B 80, K 94, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .306 → .216; ISO .188 → .124; BABIP .227 → .184. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).