Quincy McAfee
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 24 | AA/A+CIN | 384 | .211/.330/.329 | 8 | 2 | 48 | — | .173/.266/.262 |
| 2023 | 25 | AACIN | 385 | .240/.364/.454 | 14 | 10 | 78 | — | .198/.293/.362 |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA/AA/ROKCIN | 283 | .209/.299/.365 | 9 | 8 | 43 | — | .176/.246/.285 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 156 | 122 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 32 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 238 | 392 | 344 | 736 | 107 | 300 | 21 | 14 | 341 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ | Dayton Dragons | — | 170 | 144 | 32 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 222 | 337 | 396 | 733 | 174 | 257 | 19 | 13 | 330 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 301 | 254 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 34 | 82 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 217 | 328 | 339 | 666 | 122 | 287 | 27 | 11 | 303 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ | Dayton Dragons | — | 83 | 68 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 191 | 337 | 294 | 631 | 103 | 224 | 20 | 14 | 302 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 385 | 317 | 76 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 46 | 76 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 240 | 364 | 454 | 818 | 215 | 270 | 20 | 12 | 360 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA | Louisville Bats | — | 29 | 24 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 250 | 357 | 417 | 774 | 167 | 316 | 17 | 10 | 337 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 234 | 210 | 43 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 16 | 42 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 205 | 283 | 367 | 650 | 162 | 212 | 18 | 7 | 293 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | ROK | ACL Reds | — | 20 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 200 | 400 | 267 | 667 | 67 | 250 | 15 | 20 | 331 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 156 | 128 | 28 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 38 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 219 | 346 | 312 | 659 | 94 | 270 | 24 | 10 | 292 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | Dayton Dragons | — | 170 | 151 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 44 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 166 | 254 | 291 | 546 | 126 | 215 | 26 | 9 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 301 | 265 | 47 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 99 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 177 | 264 | 275 | 539 | 98 | 244 | 33 | 8 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ MLE | Dayton Dragons | — | 83 | 71 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 155 | 277 | 211 | 488 | 56 | 192 | 25 | 11 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 385 | 334 | 66 | 16 | 3 | 11 | 29 | 97 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 198 | 293 | 362 | 655 | 165 | 231 | 25 | 8 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Louisville Bats | — | 29 | 25 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 240 | 321 | 400 | 721 | 160 | 281 | 21 | 7 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 234 | 215 | 36 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 51 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 167 | 232 | 274 | 506 | 107 | 186 | 22 | 5 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | ROK MLE | ACL Reds | — | 20 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 176 | 300 | 235 | 535 | 59 | 182 | 20 | 10 | 217 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 326 | 278 | 53 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 32 | 81 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 191 | 301 | 302 | 603 | 112 | 246 | 25 | 10 | 272 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 326 | 266 | 61 | 18 | 1 | 6 | 44 | 64 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 229 | 363 | 372 | 736 | 143 | 276 | 20 | 13 | 335 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 384 | 337 | 57 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 31 | 120 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 169 | 261 | 255 | 516 | 86 | 236 | 31 | 8 | 238 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 384 | 322 | 68 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 46 | 99 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 211 | 330 | 329 | 659 | 118 | 273 | 26 | 12 | 303 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 385 | 334 | 66 | 16 | 3 | 11 | 29 | 97 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 198 | 293 | 362 | 655 | 165 | 240 | 25 | 8 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA RAW | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 385 | 317 | 76 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 46 | 76 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 240 | 364 | 454 | 818 | 215 | 270 | 20 | 12 | 360 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA MLE | 3 teams | — | 283 | 257 | 44 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 61 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 171 | 242 | 276 | 518 | 105 | 199 | 22 | 5 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA RAW | 3 teams | — | 283 | 249 | 52 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 23 | 50 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 209 | 299 | 365 | 664 | 157 | 225 | 18 | 8 | 300 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 326 | 279 | 53 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 32 | 81 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 190 | 301 | 301 | 602 | 111 | 241 | 25 | 10 | 272 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 384 | 339 | 57 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 31 | 120 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 168 | 261 | 254 | 515 | 86 | 233 | 31 | 8 | 238 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 385 | 337 | 66 | 16 | 3 | 11 | 29 | 97 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 196 | 293 | 359 | 652 | 163 | 231 | 25 | 8 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA MLE | 3 teams | — | 283 | 257 | 44 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 61 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 171 | 242 | 276 | 518 | 105 | 195 | 22 | 5 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 26 | AA MLE | 3 teams | — | 283 | 257 | 44 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 61 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 171 | 242 | 276 | 518 | 105 | 195 | 22 | 5 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1378 | 1206 | 220 | 48 | 5 | 28 | 107 | 359 | 48 | 27 | 14 | 182 | 276 | 300 | 576 | 118 | 231 | 26 | 8 | 257 | 60 | -65 | -0 | +0 | +15 | +30 | -2.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 569 | 104 | 23 | 2 | 13 | 50 | 169 | 23 | 13 | 7 | 183 | 276 | 299 | 574 | 116 | 232 | 26 | 8 | 257 | 60 | -31 | -0 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 234 PAwOBA .286 → .226 (−59)K% 17.9% → 21.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.95% | ÷1.005 | ×1.220 | — | — | 21.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.84% | ÷0.970 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.978 | 4.69% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.99% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.978 | 2.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.07% | ÷0.964 | ×0.920 | ×1.002 | ×0.978 | 15.03% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.17% | ÷1.236 | ×0.910 | ×1.002 | ×0.978 | 3.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.001 | ×0.880 | ×1.002 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.36% | ÷1.089 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 3.85% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 93, 2B 147, 3B 100, K 101, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.002.
Result: wOBA .286 → .226; ISO .162 → .115; BABIP .212 → .186. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAALouisville Bats · 29 PAwOBA .329 → .288 (−41)K% 17.2% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.24% | ÷0.999 | ×1.200 | — | — | 20.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.34% | ÷1.032 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.003 | 6.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.45% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.003 | 3.25% |
| Singles /BIP | 10.53% | ÷0.995 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.003 | 9.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 21.05% | ÷0.964 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.003 | 18.18% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.970 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.111 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 122, 1B 99, 2B 93, 3B 130, K 100, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .329 → .288; ISO .167 → .152; BABIP .316 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Reds · 20 PAwOBA .324 → .217 (−108)K% 15.0% → 21.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.00% | ÷0.989 | ×1.440 | — | — | 21.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 20.00% | ÷1.005 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.940 | 11.59% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.940 | 3.38% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.67% | ÷0.970 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.940 | 13.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.144 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.940 | 4.93% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.144 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.940 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.063 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.940 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 94, 2B 129, 3B 129, K 98, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 19.5 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .324 → .217; ISO .067 → .042; BABIP .250 → .182. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 385 PAwOBA .354 → .283 (−71)K% 19.7% → 25.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.74% | ÷0.961 | ×1.220 | — | — | 25.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.95% | ÷1.069 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.988 | 7.51% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.16% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.988 | 3.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.60% | ÷0.986 | ×0.920 | ×0.962 | ×0.988 | 14.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.47% | ÷1.004 | ×0.910 | ×0.962 | ×0.988 | 6.44% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.66% | ÷1.150 | ×0.880 | ×0.962 | ×0.988 | 1.21% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.81% | ÷1.017 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 4.51% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 97, 2B 101, 3B 130, K 92, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.962.
Result: wOBA .354 → .283; ISO .215 → .174; BABIP .270 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 301 PAwOBA .301 → .240 (−61)K% 27.2% → 32.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.24% | ÷1.010 | ×1.220 | — | — | 32.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.30% | ÷1.019 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.998 | 7.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.66% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.998 | 2.23% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.51% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | ×0.951 | ×0.998 | 18.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.40% | ÷1.084 | ×0.910 | ×0.951 | ×0.998 | 5.10% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.58% | ÷0.912 | ×0.880 | ×0.951 | ×0.998 | 0.53% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.49% | ÷0.990 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 2.81% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 100, 2B 117, 3B 82, K 102, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.951.
Result: wOBA .301 → .240; ISO .122 → .099; BABIP .287 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Dayton Dragons · 83 PAwOBA .295 → .233 (−62)K% 20.5% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.48% | ÷1.047 | ×1.270 | — | — | 24.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.46% | ÷0.958 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 10.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.61% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.978 | 2.79% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.61% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | ×0.987 | ×0.978 | 17.37% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.96% | ÷1.217 | ×0.810 | ×0.987 | ×0.978 | 1.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.028 | ×0.850 | ×0.987 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.92% | ÷1.058 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 2.90% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 100, 2B 143, 3B 106, K 109, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.
Result: wOBA .295 → .233; ISO .103 → .075; BABIP .224 → .192. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Dayton Dragons · 170 PAwOBA .324 → .253 (−71)K% 18.8% → 25.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.82% | ÷0.986 | ×1.350 | — | — | 25.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.94% | ÷1.008 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 9.01% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.76% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 1.41% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.39% | ÷1.061 | ×0.910 | ×1.012 | ×0.988 | 11.49% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.61% | ÷1.011 | ×0.830 | ×1.012 | ×0.988 | 9.53% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.820 | ×1.012 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.57% | ÷0.960 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 3.05% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 112, 2B 102, 3B 80, K 97, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.
Result: wOBA .324 → .253; ISO .174 → .141; BABIP .257 → .215. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 156 PAwOBA .337 → .292 (−45)K% 20.5% → 24.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.51% | ÷1.040 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.10% | ÷0.936 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.012 | 10.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.77% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 4.96% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.33% | ÷1.011 | ×0.940 | ×0.995 | ×1.012 | 21.84% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.56% | ÷1.183 | ×0.870 | ×0.995 | ×1.012 | 4.11% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.11% | ÷0.912 | ×0.920 | ×0.995 | ×1.012 | 1.13% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.22% | ÷0.950 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 1.85% |
Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 102, 2B 137, 3B 82, K 108, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.995.
Result: wOBA .337 → .292; ISO .107 → .092; BABIP .300 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).