Carl Calixte
OF FCL Pirates| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 18 | ROKPIT | 77 | .154/.276/.246 | 0 | 1 | -16 | — | .087/.171/.130 |
| 2026 | 19 | A/ROKPIT | 176 | .260/.369/.420 | 4 | 16 | 51 | — | .184/.267/.293 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 20 | MLBPIT | 286 | .183/.253/.275 | 4 | 6 | 50 | -0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 21 | MLBPIT | 54 | .188/.259/.285 | 1 | 1 | 55 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 25 / POW 41
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 18 | ROK | FCL Pirates | — | 77 | 65 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 154 | 276 | 246 | 522 | 92 | 294 | 42 | 13 | 246 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | A | Bradenton Marauders | — | 25 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 167 | 200 | 208 | 408 | 42 | 308 | 44 | 4 | 188 | -31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK | FCL Pirates | — | 151 | 126 | 35 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 38 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 278 | 397 | 460 | 858 | 183 | 369 | 25 | 15 | 384 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates | — | 77 | 69 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 87 | 171 | 130 | 301 | 43 | 223 | 60 | 8 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | — | 25 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 125 | 160 | 167 | 327 | 42 | 284 | 60 | 4 | 122 | -31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates | — | 151 | 134 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 55 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 194 | 285 | 313 | 598 | 119 | 298 | 36 | 9 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates | — | 77 | 69 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 87 | 171 | 130 | 301 | 43 | 250 | 60 | 8 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Pirates | — | 77 | 65 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 154 | 276 | 246 | 522 | 92 | 294 | 42 | 13 | 246 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 176 | 159 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 176 | 256 | 277 | 532 | 101 | 291 | 40 | 8 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 176 | 150 | 39 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 23 | 49 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 260 | 369 | 420 | 789 | 160 | 361 | 28 | 13 | 356 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates | — | 77 | 70 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 86 | 171 | 129 | 300 | 43 | 223 | 60 | 8 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 176 | 157 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 178 | 256 | 280 | 536 | 102 | 296 | 40 | 8 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Pirates | — | 77 | 70 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 86 | 171 | 129 | 300 | 43 | 223 | 60 | 8 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 176 | 157 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 70 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 178 | 256 | 280 | 536 | 102 | 296 | 40 | 8 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 20 | MLB MLE | PIT | 0% | 286 | 260 | 47 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 93 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 183 | 253 | 275 | 528 | 92 | 265 | 33 | 7 | 242 | 50 | -17 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +6 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 21 | MLB MLE | PIT | 34% | 157 | 142 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 50 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 188 | 259 | 288 | 547 | 100 | 267 | 32 | 8 | 250 | 55 | -8 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 21 | MLB CTX | PIT | 34% | 54 | 49 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 259 | 285 | 544 | 97 | 268 | 31 | 7 | 248 | 55 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 54 | 49 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 184 | 259 | 286 | 545 | 102 | 258 | 31 | 7 | 248 | 42 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 590 | 108 | 24 | 0 | 12 | 48 | 205 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 183 | 258 | 285 | 543 | 102 | 257 | 32 | 7 | 248 | 42 | -35 | +2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 512 | 462 | 77 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 40 | 199 | 7 | 23 | 6 | 167 | 244 | 253 | 497 | 87 | 273 | 39 | 8 | 230 | 42 | -15 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +6 | -1.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 587 | 98 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 51 | 253 | 9 | 29 | 8 | 167 | 245 | 256 | 500 | 89 | 273 | 39 | 8 | 230 | 42 | -36 | +2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Pirates · 151 PAwOBA .375 → .263 (−112)K% 25.2% → 36.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.17% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 36.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 8.99% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.99% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 1.42% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.036 | ×0.995 | 21.13% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.95% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.036 | ×0.995 | 5.90% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.036 | ×0.995 | 1.69% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 3.53% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.
Result: wOBA .375 → .263; ISO .183 → .127; BABIP .369 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ABradenton Marauders · 25 PAwOBA .183 → .122 (−61)K% 44.0% → 59.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 44.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 59.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 2.84% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.030 | 21.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.030 | 6.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .183 → .122; ISO .042 → .026; BABIP .308 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Pirates · 77 PAwOBA .244 → .144 (−100)K% 41.6% → 59.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 41.56% | ÷1.006 | ×1.440 | — | — | 59.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.99% | ÷0.998 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 8.13% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.30% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.94% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.18% | ÷1.022 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.008 | 14.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.06% | ÷1.119 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 3.93% |
| Triples /BIP | 6.06% | ÷0.950 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 4.63% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 104, 2B 124, 3B 90, K 101, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .244 → .144; ISO .092 → .049; BABIP .294 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).