Dean Curley
SS Lake County Captains| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21 | ALynchburg Hil… | 35 | .242/.286/.273 | 0 | 1 | 11 | — | .176/.200/.206 |
| 2026 | 22 | AA/A+CLE | 527 | .257/.424/.447 | 17 | 12 | 96 | — | .204/.339/.343 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBCLE | 1 | .212/.325/.355 | 0 | 0 | 96 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 24 | MLBCLE | 180 | .216/.328/.367 | 5 | 3 | 100 | 0.5 | |
| 2029PROJ55% MLB | 25 | MLBCLE | 272 | .219/.329/.375 | 8 | 5 | 102 | 0.9 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 35 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 242 | 286 | 273 | 558 | 30 | 364 | 31 | 6 | 258 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA | Akron RubberDucks | — | 198 | 170 | 45 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 25 | 64 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 265 | 369 | 441 | 810 | 176 | 384 | 32 | 13 | 364 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ | Lake County Captains | — | 329 | 235 | 59 | 15 | 1 | 10 | 82 | 92 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 251 | 458 | 451 | 910 | 200 | 360 | 28 | 25 | 409 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 35 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 176 | 200 | 206 | 406 | 29 | 319 | 43 | 3 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 198 | 177 | 38 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 78 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 215 | 298 | 339 | 637 | 124 | 354 | 39 | 9 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | — | 329 | 258 | 51 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 59 | 117 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 198 | 363 | 345 | 708 | 147 | 307 | 36 | 18 | 323 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 35 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 176 | 200 | 206 | 406 | 29 | 316 | 43 | 3 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 35 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 242 | 286 | 273 | 558 | 30 | 364 | 31 | 6 | 258 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 527 | 435 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 14 | 77 | 195 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 207 | 340 | 352 | 692 | 145 | 332 | 37 | 15 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 527 | 405 | 104 | 24 | 1 | 17 | 107 | 156 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 257 | 424 | 447 | 871 | 190 | 370 | 30 | 20 | 392 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 35 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 176 | 200 | 206 | 406 | 29 | 319 | 43 | 3 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 527 | 434 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 14 | 77 | 195 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 207 | 340 | 353 | 693 | 145 | 325 | 37 | 15 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 35 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 176 | 200 | 206 | 406 | 29 | 319 | 43 | 3 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 527 | 434 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 14 | 77 | 195 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 207 | 340 | 353 | 693 | 145 | 325 | 37 | 15 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | CLE | 0% | 511 | 433 | 92 | 18 | 2 | 14 | 66 | 161 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 211 | 325 | 355 | 680 | 144 | 296 | 32 | 13 | 310 | 96 | -3 | +1 | -3 | +5 | +11 | 0.6 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB CTX | CLE | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 212 | 325 | 355 | 680 | 143 | 297 | 0 | 0 | 310 | 96 | -0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +0 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | CLE | 38% | 473 | 403 | 88 | 17 | 2 | 14 | 60 | 146 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 216 | 328 | 368 | 696 | 152 | 297 | 31 | 13 | 315 | 100 | -0 | +1 | -2 | +5 | +10 | 1.4 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | CLE | 55% | 490 | 418 | 92 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 62 | 149 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 219 | 329 | 376 | 705 | 157 | 297 | 30 | 13 | 319 | 102 | +1 | +1 | -2 | +5 | +11 | 1.6 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | CLE | 64% | 496 | 424 | 93 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 62 | 149 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 221 | 329 | 380 | 709 | 159 | 297 | 30 | 12 | 320 | 103 | +2 | +0 | -2 | +5 | +11 | 1.7 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 66% | 495 | 424 | 94 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 61 | 147 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 221 | 328 | 379 | 707 | 158 | 296 | 30 | 12 | 319 | 102 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +5 | +11 | 1.6 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 67% | 489 | 421 | 93 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 59 | 145 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 221 | 326 | 376 | 702 | 155 | 295 | 30 | 12 | 317 | 100 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +5 | +11 | 1.4 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 66% | 481 | 414 | 90 | 17 | 2 | 14 | 58 | 144 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 218 | 323 | 370 | 693 | 152 | 293 | 30 | 12 | 313 | 98 | -1 | -0 | -3 | +5 | +10 | 1.2 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | CLE | 71% | 472 | 407 | 87 | 17 | 1 | 13 | 56 | 142 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 215 | 319 | 362 | 682 | 147 | 292 | 30 | 12 | 309 | 95 | -3 | -0 | -4 | +5 | +10 | 0.9 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB MLE | CLE | 74% | 461 | 398 | 83 | 16 | 1 | 12 | 55 | 141 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 211 | 315 | 352 | 667 | 141 | 289 | 31 | 12 | 303 | 91 | -5 | -1 | -4 | +5 | +10 | 0.5 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB MLE | CLE | 77% | 379 | 328 | 68 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 44 | 118 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 206 | 309 | 340 | 649 | 134 | 285 | 31 | 12 | 296 | 86 | -6 | -3 | -5 | +4 | +8 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | CLE | 38% | 180 | 152 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 56 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 216 | 328 | 367 | 696 | 151 | 298 | 31 | 13 | 315 | 100 | -0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | +4 | 0.5 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | CLE | 55% | 272 | 232 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 34 | 83 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 219 | 329 | 375 | 705 | 156 | 298 | 31 | 12 | 319 | 102 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +6 | 0.9 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | CLE | 64% | 316 | 270 | 60 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 39 | 95 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 221 | 329 | 380 | 709 | 159 | 297 | 30 | 12 | 320 | 103 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +7 | 1.1 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 66% | 325 | 278 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 40 | 97 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 221 | 328 | 379 | 707 | 157 | 297 | 30 | 12 | 319 | 102 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +7 | 1.1 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 67% | 327 | 281 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 39 | 97 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 221 | 326 | 376 | 701 | 155 | 295 | 30 | 12 | 317 | 100 | +0 | +0 | -2 | +4 | +7 | 1.0 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 66% | 316 | 271 | 60 | 12 | 1 | 9 | 38 | 94 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 219 | 323 | 369 | 693 | 151 | 294 | 30 | 12 | 313 | 98 | -1 | +0 | -2 | +3 | +7 | 0.8 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | CLE | 71% | 334 | 287 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 9 | 40 | 101 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 216 | 320 | 362 | 682 | 146 | 292 | 30 | 12 | 309 | 95 | -2 | -0 | -3 | +4 | +7 | 0.6 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB CTX | CLE | 74% | 343 | 295 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 9 | 41 | 105 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 212 | 315 | 352 | 668 | 141 | 289 | 31 | 12 | 303 | 91 | -4 | -1 | -3 | +4 | +7 | 0.4 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB CTX | CLE | 77% | 291 | 252 | 52 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 34 | 90 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 207 | 309 | 340 | 649 | 133 | 285 | 31 | 12 | 296 | 86 | -5 | -2 | -4 | +3 | +6 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 2704 | 2318 | 505 | 99 | 9 | 77 | 328 | 818 | 34 | 42 | 25 | 218 | 324 | 368 | 691 | 150 | 298 | 30 | 12 | 312 | 97 | -8 | -2 | -17 | +29 | +59 | 6.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 557 | 122 | 24 | 2 | 19 | 79 | 197 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 219 | 325 | 372 | 696 | 153 | 299 | 30 | 12 | 312 | 97 | -2 | -0 | -4 | +7 | +14 | 1.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 5008 | 4284 | 922 | 179 | 17 | 143 | 622 | 1557 | 69 | 83 | 48 | 215 | 324 | 365 | 689 | 150 | 299 | 31 | 12 | 311 | 97 | -12 | -3 | -27 | +48 | +96 | 10.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 556 | 120 | 23 | 2 | 19 | 81 | 202 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 216 | 325 | 367 | 692 | 151 | 299 | 31 | 12 | 311 | 97 | -2 | -0 | -4 | +7 | +14 | 1.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Lake County Captains · 329 PAwOBA .404 → .323 (−81)K% 28.0% → 35.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.96% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 35.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 24.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 17.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.43% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 1.94% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.964 | ×1.012 | 20.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×0.964 | ×1.012 | 8.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×0.964 | ×1.012 | 0.58% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 5.66% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.964.
Result: wOBA .404 → .323; ISO .200 → .165; BABIP .360 → .307. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAAkron RubberDucks · 198 PAwOBA .354 → .288 (−67)K% 32.3% → 39.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.32% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 39.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.042 | 9.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.52% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.042 | 1.34% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.36% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 26.27% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.860 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 7.23% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.950 | ×0.950 | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.042 | 5.37% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .354 → .288; ISO .176 → .136; BABIP .384 → .354. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALynchburg Hillcats · 35 PAwOBA .251 → .184 (−67)K% 31.4% → 43.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.43% | ÷0.989 | ×1.360 | — | — | 43.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.71% | ÷0.975 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 4.11% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.82% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 27.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.55% | ÷0.921 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 4.16% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.020 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.184 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 137, 1B 114, 2B 84, 3B 104, K 98, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .251 → .184; ISO .030 → .023; BABIP .364 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).