Juan Bello

P Asheville Tourists
Age 23 RHP 6'1" / 173 lbs A+ peak 0.5 · 2028
Overview
A+PROSPECT
ETA2028MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202420ACHC2222903.212.7325.1%7.7%—K 18.6% · BB 9.1% · FIP 3.77
202521A+HOU179663.703.5423.0%11.1%—K 17.7% · BB 12.8% · FIP 4.15
2027PROJ23MLBHOU——05.175.1717.4%12.7%—
2028PROJ43% MLB24MLBHOU55275.004.9418.6%11.7%0.1
2029PROJ66% MLB25MLBHOU55304.864.8019.3%11.1%0.2
Next 3 projected WAR 0.3Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
Scouting grades · 20-80
Stuff40Control40Command40
CompsRyan Atkinson (age 23) · Jeremy Lee (age 22) · Tanner Hall (age 22)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 131123vR 115
ERA5.17
FIP5.17
K%17.4%
BB%12.7%
K-BB%4.7%
Proj IP62
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 62 IP
K: -2.4 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-2KBB: -3.1 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-3BBCONTACT: -1.4 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-1CONTACTSTAM: +2.8 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+3STAMTotal WAR: -0.42 (62 IP)-0.4WAR
0.20.10.20.30.327283031
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
STUF4040
CTRL4040
CMD4040
K†4045

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202218ROK MLEDSL Cubs Red9831126347389%3.518.3%6.9%11.4%2.9%4.024.02—
202218ROK RAWDSL Cubs Red9831126347389%3.527.0%5.6%21.4%2.4%4.022.84—
202319ROK MLEACL Cubs4342154075%1.123.8%19.0%4.8%0.0%10.383.50—
202319ROK RAWACL Cubs4342154075%1.123.8%19.0%4.8%0.0%10.383.56—
202420A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans22229036391285100%4.118.6%9.1%9.4%2.0%3.213.77—
202420A MLEMyrtle Beach Pelicans22229036391285100%4.118.6%9.1%9.4%2.0%3.213.77—
202420A RAWMyrtle Beach Pelicans22229036391285100%4.125.1%7.7%17.4%1.4%3.212.73—
202521A+ MLEAsheville Tourists179662876632553%3.917.7%12.8%4.9%1.7%3.704.15—
202521A+ MLEAsheville Tourists179662876632553%3.917.7%12.8%4.9%1.7%3.704.15—
202521A+ RAWAsheville Tourists179662876632553%3.923.0%11.1%11.8%1.7%3.703.54—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202723MLBHOU——0——————17.4%12.7%4.7%2.8%5.175.17—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202824MLB MLEHOU11116226048317100%5.618.6%11.7%6.9%2.8%5.004.94+0.3
202925MLB MLEHOU884519137215100%5.719.3%11.1%8.2%2.8%4.864.80+0.3
203026MLB MLEHOU774418737215100%6.319.7%11.0%8.7%2.8%4.794.76+0.3
203127MLB MLEHOU774318136205100%6.119.8%11.0%8.8%2.9%4.784.78+0.3
202824MLB CTXHOU552711421133100%5.418.6%11.7%6.9%2.8%5.004.94+0.1
202925MLB CTXHOU553012724144100%6.019.3%11.1%8.2%2.8%4.864.80+0.2
203026MLB CTXHOU663514829164100%5.819.7%11.0%8.7%2.8%4.794.76+0.3
203127MLB CTXHOU663715631174100%6.219.8%11.0%8.8%2.9%4.784.78+0.3
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW22221285421056115100%5.819.4%11.2%8.2%2.8%4.854.43+1.4
/ 200 IP— RAW34342008441649523100%5.919.4%11.2%8.2%2.8%4.854.43+2.3
Career— MLE5242191797146831681%3.718.4%10.4%8.0%2.0%3.683.94+1.3
/ 200 IP— MLE5444200835153861681%3.718.4%10.4%8.0%2.0%3.683.94+1.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 A+Asheville Tourists · 66 IPFIP 3.53 → 4.15 (+0.62)K% 23.0% → 17.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.00%—×0.77017.71%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.15%—×1.15012.82%
HR / BF /BF1.74%÷1.297×1.2501.68%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 159).

Result: FIP 3.53 → 4.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 90 IPFIP 2.72 → 3.77 (+1.05)K% 25.1% → 18.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.07%—×0.74018.55%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.71%—×1.1809.10%
HR / BF /BF1.38%÷0.908×1.3001.97%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).

Result: FIP 2.72 → 3.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ROKACL Cubs · 4 IPFIP 3.50 → 4.75 (+1.25)K% 23.8% → 16.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.81%—×0.68016.19%
BB% (unintentional) /BF19.05%—×1.25023.81%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 3.50 → 4.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ROKDSL Cubs Red · 31 IPFIP 2.83 → 4.02 (+1.18)K% 27.0% → 18.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.98%—×0.68018.35%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.56%—×1.2506.94%
HR / BF /BF2.38%÷1.154×1.4002.89%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 131).

Result: FIP 2.83 → 4.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player162sIP/yrK%BB%HR/9ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION1.35118.8%11.6%1.104.94
Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*)1.35220.3%*11.5%*1.13*4.84*
Tyler Yates ('09)1.26219.7%12.0%0.945.12
Jesus Colome ('10)2.15317.3%11.7%1.034.69
Valerio De Los Santos ('08)1.35118.7%11.5%1.304.57
Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*)1.05021.5%*11.9%*1.05*4.68*
Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*)1.24020.0%*12.5%*0.98*4.96*