Luis Cesar
P Jupiter Hammerheads| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | ROKMIA | 12 | 10 | 47 | 2.30 | 4.57 | 19.4% | 15.8% | — | K 13.2% · BB 19.8% · FIP 6.24 |
| 2025 | 21 | ROKMIA | 10 | 0 | 26 | 4.85 | 3.79 | 20.9% | 18.6% | — | K 14.2% · BB 23.3% · FIP 4.84 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX3 levels | 18 | 0 | 26 | 7.18 | 5.30 | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | K 17.5% · BB 28.0% · FIP 5.90 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBMIA | — | — | 0 | 5.93 | 5.93 | 19.6% | 20.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBMIA | 7 | 0 | 7 | 5.56 | 5.43 | 20.7% | 16.8% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Marlins | 2 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 2.5 | 14.3% | 19.0% | -4.8% | 0.0% | 1.80 | 4.31 | — |
| 2022 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Marlins | 2 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 2.5 | 14.3% | 19.0% | -4.8% | 0.0% | 1.80 | 4.30 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Marlins | 11 | 9 | 40 | 188 | 41 | 31 | 2 | 82% | 3.6 | 14.8% | 20.6% | -5.8% | 1.5% | 4.08 | 5.28 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Marlins | 11 | 9 | 40 | 188 | 41 | 31 | 2 | 82% | 3.6 | 21.8% | 16.5% | 5.3% | 1.1% | 4.08 | 4.03 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Marlins | 12 | 10 | 47 | 196 | 38 | 31 | 4 | 83% | 3.9 | 13.2% | 19.8% | -6.6% | 3.2% | 2.30 | 6.24 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Marlins | 12 | 10 | 47 | 196 | 38 | 31 | 4 | 83% | 3.9 | 13.2% | 19.8% | -6.6% | 3.2% | 2.30 | 6.24 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Marlins | 12 | 10 | 47 | 196 | 38 | 31 | 4 | 83% | 3.9 | 19.4% | 15.8% | 3.6% | 2.0% | 2.30 | 4.57 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Marlins | 10 | 0 | 26 | 129 | 27 | 24 | 0 | 0% | 2.6 | 14.2% | 23.3% | -9.0% | 0.0% | 4.85 | 4.84 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Marlins | 10 | 0 | 26 | 129 | 27 | 24 | 0 | 0% | 2.6 | 14.2% | 23.3% | -9.0% | 0.0% | 4.85 | 4.84 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Marlins | 10 | 0 | 26 | 129 | 27 | 24 | 0 | 0% | 2.6 | 20.9% | 18.6% | 2.3% | 0.0% | 4.85 | 3.79 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 18 | 0 | 26 | 139 | 32 | 32 | 2 | 0% | 1.5 | 17.5% | 28.0% | -10.4% | 1.3% | 7.18 | 5.90 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 18 | 0 | 26 | 139 | 32 | 32 | 2 | 0% | 1.5 | 17.5% | 28.0% | -10.4% | 1.3% | 7.18 | 5.90 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 18 | 0 | 26 | 139 | 32 | 32 | 2 | 0% | 1.5 | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 7.18 | 5.30 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | MIA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.6% | 20.0% | -0.4% | 2.9% | 5.93 | 5.93 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | MIA | 16 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 15 | 12 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.7% | 16.8% | 3.9% | 2.8% | 5.56 | 5.43 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | MIA | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 16.8% | 3.9% | 2.8% | 5.56 | 5.43 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 0 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.7% | 16.8% | 3.9% | 2.8% | 5.56 | 5.05 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 162 | 135 | 27 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.7% | 16.8% | 3.9% | 2.8% | 5.56 | 5.05 | -1.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 53 | 21 | 144 | 673 | 99 | 150 | 11 | 40% | 2.7 | 14.8% | 22.3% | -7.6% | 1.6% | 4.12 | 5.57 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 74 | 29 | 200 | 935 | 138 | 209 | 15 | 40% | 2.7 | 14.8% | 22.3% | -7.6% | 1.6% | 4.12 | 5.57 | -2.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AJupiter Hammerheads · 18 IPFIP 4.67 → 5.90 (+1.23)K% 23.7% → 17.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.71% | — | ×0.740 | 17.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 23.71% | — | ×1.180 | 27.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 1.34% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.67 → 5.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Marlins · 6 IPFIP 5.66 → 7.29 (+1.62)K% 14.3% → 9.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.29% | — | ×0.680 | 9.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.29% | — | ×1.250 | 17.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.57% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 5.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.66 → 7.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Marlins · 26 IPFIP 3.69 → 4.84 (+1.15)K% 20.9% → 14.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.93% | — | ×0.680 | 14.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.60% | — | ×1.250 | 23.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.910 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.69 → 4.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Marlins · 47 IPFIP 4.59 → 6.24 (+1.65)K% 19.4% → 13.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.39% | — | ×0.680 | 13.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.82% | — | ×1.250 | 19.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.04% | ÷0.898 | ×1.400 | 3.18% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 80).
Result: FIP 4.59 → 6.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Marlins · 40 IPFIP 3.93 → 5.28 (+1.35)K% 21.8% → 14.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.81% | — | ×0.680 | 14.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.49% | — | ×1.250 | 20.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.06% | ÷0.995 | ×1.400 | 1.50% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 3.93 → 5.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL Marlins · 5 IPFIP 4.31 → 5.30 (+0.99)K% 14.3% → 9.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.29% | — | ×0.680 | 9.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.05% | — | ×1.250 | 23.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.016 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 4.31 → 5.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).