Jackson Lovich
SS Tampa Tarpons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21 | ANYY | 26 | .636/.692/1.000 | 0 | 3 | 273 | — | .522/.577/.826 |
| 2026 | 22 | A+/ANYY | 510 | .287/.365/.512 | 24 | 41 | 82 | — | .227/.286/.395 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBNYY | 513 | .245/.302/.409 | 17 | 16 | 99 | 0.9 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 24 | MLBNYY | 147 | .248/.307/.422 | 5 | 5 | 100 | 0.6 | |
| 2029PROJ48% MLB | 25 | MLBNYY | 242 | .248/.308/.423 | 9 | 7 | 101 | 0.9 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A | Tampa Tarpons | — | 26 | 22 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 636 | 692 | 1.000 | 1.692 | 364 | 737 | 12 | 15 | 708 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ | Hudson Valley Renegades | — | 147 | 129 | 41 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 45 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 318 | 393 | 519 | 912 | 202 | 438 | 31 | 11 | 396 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A | Tampa Tarpons | — | 363 | 320 | 88 | 17 | 2 | 18 | 36 | 101 | 3 | 21 | 7 | 275 | 354 | 509 | 863 | 234 | 341 | 28 | 10 | 375 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 26 | 23 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 522 | 577 | 826 | 1.403 | 304 | 618 | 15 | 12 | 572 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | Hudson Valley Renegades | — | 147 | 135 | 35 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 59 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 259 | 310 | 422 | 733 | 163 | 387 | 40 | 7 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 363 | 331 | 71 | 13 | 2 | 13 | 25 | 137 | 3 | 21 | 7 | 215 | 276 | 384 | 659 | 169 | 306 | 38 | 7 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 26 | 23 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 522 | 577 | 826 | 1.403 | 304 | 632 | 15 | 12 | 572 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Tampa Tarpons | — | 26 | 22 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 636 | 692 | 1.000 | 1.692 | 364 | 737 | 12 | 15 | 708 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 510 | 467 | 105 | 16 | 3 | 18 | 34 | 196 | 3 | 41 | 9 | 225 | 282 | 388 | 669 | 163 | 336 | 38 | 7 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 510 | 449 | 129 | 21 | 4 | 24 | 52 | 146 | 3 | 41 | 9 | 287 | 365 | 512 | 877 | 225 | 368 | 29 | 10 | 381 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 26 | 23 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 522 | 577 | 826 | 1.403 | 304 | 618 | 15 | 12 | 572 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 510 | 468 | 105 | 16 | 3 | 18 | 34 | 196 | 3 | 41 | 9 | 224 | 282 | 387 | 668 | 162 | 329 | 38 | 7 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Tampa Tarpons | — | 26 | 23 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 522 | 577 | 826 | 1.403 | 304 | 618 | 15 | 12 | 572 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 510 | 468 | 105 | 16 | 3 | 18 | 34 | 196 | 3 | 41 | 9 | 224 | 282 | 387 | 668 | 162 | 329 | 38 | 7 | 290 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | NYY | 0% | 513 | 469 | 114 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 36 | 155 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 245 | 302 | 409 | 712 | 165 | 325 | 30 | 7 | 314 | 99 | -1 | +2 | +0 | +5 | +11 | 0.9 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | NYY | 30% | 481 | 441 | 108 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 34 | 143 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 246 | 305 | 413 | 718 | 167 | 324 | 30 | 7 | 317 | 100 | +0 | +2 | +0 | +5 | +10 | 1.8 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | NYY | 48% | 504 | 460 | 113 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 36 | 147 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 246 | 306 | 414 | 720 | 167 | 322 | 29 | 7 | 318 | 101 | +1 | +2 | +0 | +5 | +11 | 2.0 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | NYY | 58% | 510 | 464 | 114 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 37 | 147 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 246 | 307 | 413 | 720 | 167 | 320 | 29 | 7 | 318 | 101 | +1 | +2 | +0 | +5 | +11 | 2.0 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | NYY | 62% | 509 | 462 | 114 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 38 | 146 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 245 | 307 | 411 | 717 | 165 | 318 | 29 | 7 | 317 | 101 | +0 | +2 | +0 | +5 | +11 | 1.9 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | NYY | 65% | 504 | 459 | 112 | 20 | 3 | 16 | 37 | 144 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 244 | 305 | 406 | 712 | 163 | 316 | 29 | 7 | 315 | 99 | -0 | +1 | -0 | +5 | +11 | 1.7 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | NYY | 71% | 495 | 453 | 109 | 20 | 3 | 15 | 36 | 143 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 241 | 303 | 400 | 703 | 159 | 315 | 29 | 7 | 311 | 97 | -2 | +1 | -1 | +5 | +11 | 1.4 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | NYY | 68% | 485 | 444 | 106 | 19 | 3 | 15 | 35 | 142 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 239 | 299 | 393 | 692 | 154 | 313 | 29 | 7 | 307 | 94 | -4 | +1 | -2 | +5 | +11 | 1.1 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB MLE | NYY | 74% | 474 | 434 | 102 | 18 | 3 | 14 | 34 | 140 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 235 | 295 | 384 | 678 | 149 | 311 | 30 | 7 | 301 | 90 | -6 | +0 | -2 | +5 | +10 | 0.7 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB MLE | NYY | 78% | 380 | 348 | 79 | 14 | 2 | 10 | 27 | 114 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 230 | 289 | 372 | 660 | 142 | 307 | 30 | 7 | 294 | 85 | -7 | -0 | -3 | +4 | +8 | 0.2 |
| 2037 | 33 | MLB MLE | NYY | 81% | 345 | 316 | 71 | 12 | 2 | 9 | 24 | 106 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 223 | 281 | 357 | 638 | 134 | 302 | 31 | 7 | 285 | 79 | -9 | -0 | -4 | +4 | +7 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | NYY | 30% | 147 | 135 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 44 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 248 | 307 | 422 | 728 | 174 | 324 | 30 | 7 | 321 | 100 | +0 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +3 | 0.6 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | NYY | 48% | 242 | 221 | 56 | 10 | 2 | 9 | 17 | 71 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 248 | 308 | 423 | 731 | 174 | 323 | 29 | 7 | 322 | 101 | +0 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +5 | 0.9 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | NYY | 58% | 297 | 271 | 67 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 22 | 86 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 248 | 309 | 422 | 731 | 174 | 321 | 29 | 7 | 322 | 101 | +0 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +6 | 1.2 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | NYY | 62% | 316 | 288 | 72 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 23 | 91 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 247 | 308 | 420 | 728 | 172 | 319 | 29 | 7 | 321 | 101 | +0 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +7 | 1.2 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | NYY | 65% | 325 | 296 | 73 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 24 | 93 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 246 | 307 | 415 | 722 | 169 | 317 | 29 | 7 | 319 | 99 | -0 | +1 | -0 | +3 | +7 | 1.1 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | NYY | 71% | 350 | 319 | 78 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 26 | 101 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 243 | 304 | 409 | 713 | 165 | 315 | 29 | 7 | 315 | 97 | -1 | +1 | -1 | +4 | +8 | 1.0 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | NYY | 68% | 332 | 303 | 73 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 24 | 97 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 240 | 301 | 401 | 702 | 161 | 314 | 29 | 7 | 311 | 94 | -2 | +1 | -1 | +4 | +7 | 0.8 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB CTX | NYY | 74% | 349 | 319 | 75 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 25 | 103 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 236 | 296 | 391 | 688 | 155 | 311 | 30 | 7 | 305 | 90 | -4 | +0 | -2 | +4 | +8 | 0.6 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB CTX | NYY | 78% | 296 | 271 | 64 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 21 | 89 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 231 | 290 | 379 | 669 | 148 | 307 | 30 | 7 | 297 | 85 | -5 | -0 | -3 | +3 | +6 | 0.2 |
| 2037 | 33 | MLB CTX | NYY | 81% | 279 | 257 | 58 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 19 | 85 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 225 | 283 | 364 | 646 | 139 | 302 | 30 | 7 | 288 | 79 | -7 | -0 | -3 | +3 | +6 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 2933 | 2680 | 649 | 115 | 18 | 97 | 211 | 860 | 18 | 54 | 15 | 242 | 302 | 407 | 709 | 165 | 318 | 29 | 7 | 312 | 95 | -19 | +5 | -9 | +31 | +64 | 7.3 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 594 | 143 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 47 | 191 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 241 | 301 | 402 | 703 | 162 | 317 | 29 | 7 | 312 | 95 | -4 | +1 | -2 | +7 | +14 | 1.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 5433 | 4963 | 1191 | 209 | 34 | 171 | 390 | 1635 | 34 | 149 | 34 | 240 | 300 | 399 | 699 | 159 | 320 | 30 | 7 | 309 | 95 | -25 | +11 | -11 | +52 | +106 | 13.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 594 | 142 | 25 | 4 | 20 | 47 | 196 | 4 | 18 | 4 | 239 | 300 | 396 | 695 | 157 | 319 | 30 | 7 | 309 | 95 | -3 | +1 | -1 | +7 | +14 | 1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ATampa Tarpons · 363 PAwOBA .368 → .283 (−85)K% 27.8% → 37.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.82% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 6.77% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.83% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.64% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.030 | ×0.990 | 21.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.030 | ×0.990 | 6.57% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.91% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.030 | ×0.990 | 0.85% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.22% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 6.51% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.
Result: wOBA .368 → .283; ISO .234 → .173; BABIP .341 → .306. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Hudson Valley Renegades · 147 PAwOBA .391 → .306 (−85)K% 30.6% → 40.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.61% | ÷1.000 | ×1.310 | — | — | 40.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | — | ×0.998 | 6.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 34.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.870 | ×1.043 | ×0.998 | 31.26% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | ×1.043 | ×0.998 | 3.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.043 | ×0.998 | 2.11% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.14% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.998 | 6.27% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.043.
Result: wOBA .391 → .306; ISO .202 → .164; BABIP .438 → .387. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ATampa Tarpons · 26 PAwOBA .689 → .572 (−117)K% 11.5% → 15.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.54% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 15.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.38% | ÷0.971 | ×0.690 | — | — | 10.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 42.11% | ÷1.119 | ×0.920 | — | — | 34.62% |
| Doubles /BIP | 21.05% | ÷1.046 | ×0.830 | — | — | 16.71% |
| Triples /BIP | 10.53% | ÷0.913 | ×0.910 | — | — | 10.49% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.842 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 68, 1B 124, 2B 109, 3B 83, K 100, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .689 → .572; ISO .364 → .327; BABIP .737 → .618. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).