Jalin Flores
3B Peoria Chiefs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | ASTL | 105 | .223/.298/.319 | 2 | 1 | 24 | — | .155/.212/.206 |
| 2026 | 23 | A+STL | 492 | .251/.312/.443 | 17 | 7 | 57 | — | .197/.248/.340 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBSTL | 1 | .195/.245/.318 | 0 | 0 | 57 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBSTL | 79 | .198/.249/.324 | 2 | 1 | 60 | -0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBSTL | 135 | .200/.253/.327 | 3 | 2 | 63 | -0.3 |
Tools · ContractCON 22 / POW 44
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 105 | 94 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 223 | 298 | 319 | 617 | 96 | 322 | 32 | 10 | 281 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ | Peoria Chiefs | — | 492 | 447 | 112 | 27 | 4 | 17 | 31 | 133 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 251 | 312 | 443 | 755 | 192 | 315 | 27 | 6 | 331 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 105 | 97 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 212 | 206 | 418 | 52 | 281 | 44 | 7 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Peoria Chiefs | — | 492 | 456 | 90 | 20 | 3 | 13 | 22 | 169 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 197 | 248 | 340 | 588 | 143 | 271 | 34 | 4 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 105 | 97 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 212 | 206 | 418 | 52 | 275 | 44 | 7 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A RAW | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 105 | 94 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 223 | 298 | 319 | 617 | 96 | 322 | 32 | 10 | 281 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Peoria Chiefs | — | 492 | 456 | 90 | 20 | 3 | 13 | 22 | 169 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 197 | 248 | 340 | 588 | 143 | 276 | 34 | 4 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ RAW | Peoria Chiefs | — | 492 | 447 | 112 | 27 | 4 | 17 | 31 | 133 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 251 | 312 | 443 | 755 | 192 | 315 | 27 | 6 | 331 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 105 | 97 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 212 | 206 | 418 | 52 | 281 | 44 | 7 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Peoria Chiefs | — | 492 | 458 | 90 | 20 | 3 | 13 | 22 | 169 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 197 | 248 | 338 | 587 | 142 | 271 | 34 | 4 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 105 | 97 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 212 | 206 | 418 | 52 | 281 | 44 | 7 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Peoria Chiefs | — | 492 | 458 | 90 | 20 | 3 | 13 | 22 | 169 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 197 | 248 | 338 | 587 | 142 | 271 | 34 | 4 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | STL | 0% | 380 | 354 | 69 | 14 | 2 | 9 | 18 | 109 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 196 | 245 | 322 | 567 | 126 | 252 | 29 | 5 | 253 | 57 | -19 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +8 | -0.2 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB CTX | STL | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 195 | 245 | 318 | 563 | 123 | 254 | 0 | 0 | 252 | 57 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | STL | 30% | 260 | 242 | 48 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 73 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 198 | 249 | 328 | 577 | 129 | 254 | 28 | 5 | 257 | 60 | -12 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -0.5 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | STL | 44% | 305 | 282 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 16 | 85 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 201 | 253 | 331 | 584 | 131 | 255 | 28 | 5 | 261 | 63 | -14 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +7 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | STL | 30% | 79 | 74 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 198 | 249 | 324 | 573 | 125 | 256 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 60 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +2 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | STL | 44% | 135 | 125 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 38 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 200 | 253 | 327 | 580 | 127 | 257 | 28 | 5 | 259 | 63 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +3 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 214 | 199 | 39 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 60 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 196 | 249 | 322 | 570 | 126 | 252 | 28 | 5 | 258 | 57 | -10 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 604 | 118 | 24 | 3 | 15 | 33 | 182 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 195 | 247 | 320 | 567 | 124 | 251 | 28 | 5 | 258 | 57 | -30 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1372 | 1272 | 248 | 51 | 6 | 33 | 68 | 433 | 19 | 19 | 5 | 195 | 247 | 322 | 569 | 127 | 263 | 32 | 5 | 252 | 57 | -37 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +17 | -1.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 603 | 118 | 24 | 3 | 16 | 32 | 205 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 196 | 247 | 325 | 572 | 129 | 264 | 32 | 5 | 252 | 57 | -31 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -1.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Peoria Chiefs · 492 PAwOBA .325 → .253 (−71)K% 27.0% → 34.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 34.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 4.46% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.83% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 1.44% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.985 | ×0.998 | 18.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×0.985 | ×0.998 | 6.85% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×0.985 | ×0.998 | 1.06% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.41% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 4.32% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.
Result: wOBA .325 → .253; ISO .192 → .144; BABIP .315 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 APalm Beach Cardinals · 105 PAwOBA .276 → .204 (−73)K% 32.4% → 44.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.38% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 44.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.52% | ÷0.988 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.65% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.67% | ÷0.995 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | — | 23.44% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.00% | ÷0.896 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | — | 4.40% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.33% | ÷0.973 | ×0.800 | — | — | 2.74% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 99, 2B 79, 3B 80, K 100, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .276 → .204; ISO .096 → .069; BABIP .322 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).