Gavin Collins

C Memphis Redbirds
Age 32 R/R 5'11" / 205 lbs AAA HR -14%BB -5% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2034
Overview
AAAPROSPECTMiLBFA 2035
MLB%10%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202227AAACLE139.235/.331/.3704064—.205/.287/.303
202429AAASTL216.264/.336/.4619074—.226/.280/.367
202530AAASTL299.221/.303/.2972439—.191/.252/.257
2027PROJ10% MLB32MLBSTL16.214/.274/.3080064-0.0
2028PROJ27% MLB33MLBSTL40.209/.268/.2990060-0.1
Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2034Service0.0First FA2035
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.8M2030Ext$0.8M2031Ext$0.9M2032Ext$3M2033Ext$5M2034Ext$7M
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2025 AAA
Whiff%96
K%94
Z-Con%94
Speed62
BB%42
Chase%39
CompsMichel Hernandez (age 32) · Carlos Maldonado (age 32) · Tyler Ladendorf (age 31)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONstats below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+†64
AVG/OBP/SLG.214 / .274 / .308
PA16
HR0
K%19
BB%6
BABIP254
ISO67
MLB%10%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -6.6 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-7BATRUN: -0.2 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)-0RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: +2.8 runs (Positional adjustment)+3POSREP: +3.4 runs (Replacement-level credit)+3REPTotal WAR: +0.00+0.0WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
0.0-0.12728
Tools · ContractCON 50 / POW 35
Toolsscout grade
CONTACT50
scouting grade only
POWER35
scouting grade only
EYE45
scouting grade only
SPEED45
scouting grade only
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2029
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2034
First FA Year   2035
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2029
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2029
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201722 A+Lynchburg Hillcats — 162142 391604 13453 11 275348472820 197361 288 354 71 — — — — — —
201722 ALake County Captains — 159141 38518 14302 00 270344489833 220286 199 363 79 — — — — — —
201823 A+Lynchburg Hillcats — 252228 532015 14466 12 232294395689 162270 186 303 40 — — — — — —
201823 ROKAZL Indians 2 — 1717 3100 030 00 176176235412 59214 180 182 -33 — — — — — —
201924 A+Lynchburg Hillcats — 389347 912127 30525 12 262330395725 133286 138 320 65 — — — — — —
201924 INTLMesa Solar Sox — 4337 6201 381 10 162244297541 135167 197 237 47 — — — — — —
202126 AAAColumbus Clippers — 174148 27305 19446 11 182301304605 122220 2511 282 39 — — — — — —
202227 AAAColumbus Clippers — 139119 28404 12285 01 235331370701 134270 209 314 64 — — — — — —
202429 AAAMemphis Redbirds — 216193 511109 17354 00 264336461798 197280 168 350 74 — — — — — —
202530 AAAMemphis Redbirds — 299263 581022 28323 41 221303297599 76240 119 274 39 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201722 A+ MLELynchburg Hillcats — 162147 311104 8613 11 211266367633 156302 385 273 71 — — — — — —
201722 A MLELake County Captains — 159145 32415 10412 00 221280366646 145262 266 285 79 — — — — — —
201823 A+ MLELynchburg Hillcats — 252234 421415 8626 12 179226312538 132217 253 228 40 — — — — — —
201823 ROK MLEAZL Indians 2 — 1717 2100 040 00 118118176294 59163 240 120 -33 — — — — — —
201924 A+ MLELynchburg Hillcats — 389357 781517 20705 12 218270325595 106244 185 264 65 — — — — — —
202126 AAA MLEColumbus Clippers — 174154 24303 13536 11 156249234482 78205 307 226 39 — — — — — —
202227 AAA MLEColumbus Clippers — 139122 25303 9325 01 205287303590 98243 236 263 64 — — — — — —
202429 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 216199 451006 11444 00 226280367647 141252 205 278 74 — — — — — —
202530 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 299272 52822 19403 41 191252257509 66208 136 226 39 — — — — — —
201722 A+ MLE2 teams — 321291 641519 191025 11 220279371650 151296 326 279 75 — — — — — —
201722 A+ RAW2 teams — 321283 7721112 27755 11 272346481827 208322 238 358 75 — — — — — —
201823 A+ MLE2 teams — 269251 451515 8676 12 179223307529 127222 253 221 36 — — — — — —
201823 A+ RAW2 teams — 269245 562115 14496 12 229287384670 155266 185 295 36 — — — — — —
201924 A+ MLE2 teams — 432395 881728 22786 22 223274337611 114252 185 264 65 — — — — — —
201924 A+ RAW2 teams — 432384 972328 33606 22 253322385707 133275 148 312 65 — — — — — —
202126 AAA MLEColumbus Clippers — 174154 24303 13536 11 156249234482 78212 307 226 39 — — — — — —
202126 AAA RAWColumbus Clippers — 174148 27305 19446 11 182301304605 122220 2511 282 39 — — — — — —
202227 AAA MLEColumbus Clippers — 139122 25303 9325 01 205287303590 98247 236 263 64 — — — — — —
202227 AAA RAWColumbus Clippers — 139119 28404 12285 01 235331370701 134270 209 314 64 — — — — — —
202429 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 216199 451006 11444 00 226280367647 141260 205 278 74 — — — — — —
202429 AAA RAWMemphis Redbirds — 216193 511109 17354 00 264336461798 197280 168 350 74 — — — — — —
202530 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 299272 52822 19403 41 191252257509 66214 136 226 39 — — — — — —
202530 AAA RAWMemphis Redbirds — 299263 581022 28323 41 221303297599 76240 119 274 39 — — — — — —
201722 A+ MLE2 teams — 321294 641519 191025 11 218279367647 150282 326 279 75 — — — — — —
201823 A+ MLE2 teams — 269253 451515 8676 12 178223304527 126214 253 221 36 — — — — — —
201924 A+ MLE2 teams — 432401 881728 22786 22 219274332606 112244 185 264 65 — — — — — —
202126 AAA MLEColumbus Clippers — 174153 24303 13536 11 157249235484 78205 307 226 39 — — — — — —
202227 AAA MLEColumbus Clippers — 139124 25303 9325 01 202287298585 97243 236 263 64 — — — — — —
202429 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 216199 451006 11444 00 226280367647 141252 205 278 74 — — — — — —
202530 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 299275 52822 19403 41 189252255506 65208 136 226 39 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202429 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 216199 451006 11444 00 226280367647 141252 205 278 74 — — — — — —
202530 AAA MLEMemphis Redbirds — 299275 52822 19403 41 189252255506 65208 136 226 39 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202732 MLB MLESTL 10% 336308 661324 21634 51 214273309581 95252 196 263 64 -14 +1 +0 +6 +7 0.0
▸ 2027 — real world (MLB)
202732 MLB CTXSTL 10% 1615 3100 130 00 214274308582 94254 196 263 64 -1 +0 +0 +0 +0 -0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202833 MLB MLESTL 27% 147135 28512 9292 10 209267299566 90249 206 257 60 -7 +0 -4 +3 +3 -0.5
202833 MLB CTXSTL 27% 4037 8200 380 00 209268299567 89251 208 257 60 -2 +0 -1 +1 +1 -0.1
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 4037 8200 380 00 216275270545 54276 208 257 58 -2 +0 -1 +1 +1 -0.1
/ 162G— A+C — 650601 1303200 491300 00 216275270545 53276 208 257 58 -31 +0 -19 +12 +14 -2.4
Career— MLE — 21521961 40282840 12047439 129 205265316581 111246 226 253 58 -14 +0 -4 +5 +7 -0.6
/ 162G— MLE — 650592 12125212 3614312 43 204264314578 110245 226 253 58 -29 +0 -9 +12 +14 -1.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 299 PAwOBA .269 → .226 (−44)K% 10.7% → 13.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA10.70%÷0.953×1.200——13.48%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.03%÷0.954×0.690—×0.9726.35%
HBP% /PA1.00%—×0.940—×0.9720.92%
Singles /BIP19.05%÷0.982×0.930×0.962×0.97216.87%
Doubles /BIP4.33%÷1.033×0.830×0.962×0.9723.25%
Triples /BIP0.87%÷0.900×0.970×0.962×0.9720.87%
Home runs /BIP0.87%÷0.869×0.700—×0.9720.68%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 96, 2B 107, 3B 80, K 91, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.962.

Result: wOBA .269 → .226; ISO .076 → .063; BABIP .240 → .208. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 216 PAwOBA .342 → .278 (−64)K% 16.2% → 20.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA16.20%÷0.953×1.200——20.41%
BB% (unintentional) /PA7.87%÷1.014×0.690—×0.9825.26%
HBP% /PA1.85%—×0.940—×0.9821.71%
Singles /BIP19.62%÷0.991×0.930×1.005×0.98218.18%
Doubles /BIP6.96%÷0.920×0.830×1.005×0.9826.20%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.970×1.005×0.9820.00%
Home runs /BIP5.70%÷1.020×0.700—×0.9823.84%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 98, 2B 84, 3B 130, K 91, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.

Result: wOBA .342 → .278; ISO .197 → .144; BABIP .280 → .252. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAAColumbus Clippers · 139 PAwOBA .310 → .263 (−47)K% 20.1% → 23.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA20.14%÷1.036×1.200——23.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.63%÷0.930×0.690—×1.0036.42%
HBP% /PA3.60%—×0.940—×1.0033.39%
Singles /BIP21.98%÷0.941×0.930×0.950×1.00320.70%
Doubles /BIP4.40%÷1.040×0.830×0.950×1.0033.34%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.970×0.950×1.0030.00%
Home runs /BIP4.40%÷1.001×0.700—×1.0033.08%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 88, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 107, BB 86 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .310 → .263; ISO .134 → .098; BABIP .270 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAAColumbus Clippers · 174 PAwOBA .277 → .226 (−51)K% 25.3% → 30.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA25.29%÷1.002×1.200——30.29%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.92%÷1.008×0.690—×1.0187.61%
HBP% /PA3.45%—×0.940—×1.0183.30%
Singles /BIP18.27%÷0.949×0.930×0.965×1.01817.59%
Doubles /BIP2.88%÷0.949×0.830×0.965×1.0182.48%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.920×0.965×1.0180.00%
Home runs /BIP4.81%÷1.034×0.700—×1.0183.31%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 90, 2B 90, 3B 80, K 100, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.

Result: wOBA .277 → .226; ISO .122 → .086; BABIP .220 → .205. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 389 PAwOBA .317 → .264 (−53)K% 13.4% → 18.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA13.37%÷1.046×1.420——18.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA7.71%÷0.921×0.630—×0.9885.21%
HBP% /PA1.29%—×0.860—×0.9881.09%
Singles /BIP20.68%÷0.984×0.940×0.950×0.98818.55%
Doubles /BIP7.12%÷1.065×0.830×0.950×0.9885.21%
Triples /BIP0.68%÷0.999×0.800×0.950×0.9880.51%
Home runs /BIP2.37%÷0.850×0.900—×0.9882.48%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 97, 2B 113, 3B 100, K 109, BB 84 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .317 → .264; ISO .133 → .116; BABIP .286 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 252 PAwOBA .294 → .228 (−66)K% 18.3% → 24.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA18.25%÷1.047×1.420——24.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA5.16%÷1.025×0.630—×0.9983.16%
HBP% /PA2.38%—×0.860—×0.9982.04%
Singles /BIP14.84%÷1.044×0.940×0.950×0.99812.66%
Doubles /BIP10.99%÷1.054×0.830×0.950×0.9988.21%
Triples /BIP0.55%÷1.150×0.800×0.950×0.9980.36%
Home runs /BIP2.75%÷0.967×0.900—×0.9982.55%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 109, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 110, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .294 → .228; ISO .162 → .128; BABIP .270 → .217. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ROKAZL Indians 2 · 17 PAwOBA .177 → .120 (−56)K% 17.6% → 25.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.65%÷1.000×1.440——25.41%
BB% (unintentional) /PA0.00%÷1.000×0.620—×0.9650.00%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.720—×0.9650.00%
Singles /BIP14.29%÷1.000×0.820—×0.96511.30%
Doubles /BIP7.14%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9654.96%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9650.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.780—×0.9650.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .177 → .120; ISO .059 → .037; BABIP .214 → .163. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 162 PAwOBA .353 → .273 (−80)K% 27.8% → 37.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA27.78%÷1.048×1.420——37.65%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.02%÷1.008×0.630—×1.0125.07%
HBP% /PA1.85%—×0.860—×1.0121.61%
Singles /BIP19.59%÷0.978×0.940×0.950×1.01218.10%
Doubles /BIP16.49%÷1.084×0.830×0.950×1.01212.14%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.070×0.800×0.950×1.0120.00%
Home runs /BIP4.12%÷0.902×0.900—×1.0124.17%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 96, 2B 117, 3B 114, K 110, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .353 → .273; ISO .197 → .156; BABIP .361 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .