Tyler Ladendorf

Pos2B

B/TR/R

Born1988-03-07

Age (2027)39

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2021

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2018	30	AAA/AA2 orgs	163	.245/.348/.317	1	0	49	—	.198/.273/.253
2019	31	AAATB	29	.074/.107/.074	0	0	-66	—	.074/.107/.074
2021	33	AAACHC	210	.241/.300/.424	8	1	39	—	.179/.222/.296

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2008	20	ROK	GCL Twins	—	175	147	30	8	1	1	17	29	6	6	0	204	312	293	604	88	244	17	10	276	25	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A	Kane County Cougars	—	210	190	44	6	2	2	14	32	4	4	3	232	298	316	614	84	269	15	7	279	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	ROK	Elizabethton Twins	—	74	61	25	7	0	4	11	7	1	1	0	410	507	721	1.228	311	412	9	15	519	149	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A+	Stockton Ports	—	525	478	131	30	4	5	35	110	3	20	4	274	327	385	712	111	344	21	7	315	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AAA	Sacramento River Cats	—	21	19	4	1	0	0	1	6	0	0	0	211	250	263	513	53	308	29	5	224	18	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	494	433	98	17	3	6	46	88	6	6	5	226	309	321	630	95	270	18	9	285	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	476	416	100	20	1	9	42	89	11	7	4	240	326	358	684	118	283	19	9	308	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AAA	Sacramento River Cats	—	32	28	3	1	0	0	4	3	0	0	0	107	219	143	362	36	120	9	12	184	-14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	303	266	70	16	1	6	27	45	5	2	0	263	341	398	740	135	295	15	9	329	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA	Sacramento River Cats	—	314	273	81	18	3	2	35	56	2	3	1	297	381	407	787	110	361	18	11	352	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	MLB	Oakland Athletics	—	18	17	4	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	0	235	278	353	631	118	267	11	6	279	77	-0	+0	-0	+0	+0	-0.0
2015	27	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	90	83	22	2	1	1	5	23	1	0	1	265	315	349	664	84	350	26	6	298	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	MLB	Oakland Athletics	—	50	48	4	0	0	0	1	13	0	2	0	83	102	83	185		114	26	2	86	-55	-9	+0	+1	+1	+1	-0.7
2016	28	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	137	128	30	5	0	1	7	26	0	0	0	234	274	297	571	62	287	19	5	256	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA	Charlotte Knights	—	222	200	50	14	0	2	18	40	4	4	1	250	324	350	674	100	304	18	8	308	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	AAA	Reno Aces	—	61	54	17	3	0	0	7	5	0	0	1	315	393	370	764	56	347	8	11	351	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	AA	Jackson Generals	—	102	85	17	4	0	1	14	15	1	0	1	200	320	282	602	82	225	15	14	280	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	AAA	Durham Bulls	—	29	27	2	0	0	0	1	12	0	0	0	74	107	74	181		125	41	3	86	-66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	210	191	46	11	0	8	13	53	3	1	0	241	300	424	724	183	288	25	6	317	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	68	65	8	0	1	0	2	15	0	2	0	123	149	154	303	31	160	22	3	137	-21	-10	+0	+0	+1	+1	-0.7
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2008	20	ROK MLE	GCL Twins	—	175	154	25	6	1	1	10	42	6	6	0	162	241	234	475	71	199	24	6	205	25	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A MLE	Kane County Cougars	—	210	196	40	5	2	2	8	43	4	4	3	204	250	281	531	77	246	20	4	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	ROK MLE	Elizabethton Twins	—	74	65	19	5	0	3	7	10	1	1	0	292	370	508	878	215	306	14	9	388	149	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	525	490	115	25	3	4	24	142	3	20	4	235	275	322	597	88	313	27	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	21	19	4	1	0	0	1	8	0	0	0	211	250	263	513	53	291	38	5	195	18	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	494	447	85	13	3	5	32	114	6	6	5	190	254	266	520	76	235	23	6	230	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	476	428	86	16	1	8	30	113	11	7	4	201	271	299	570	98	245	24	6	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	32	29	3	1	0	0	3	4	0	0	0	103	188	138	325	34	108	12	9	147	-14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	303	276	60	12	1	6	18	58	5	2	0	217	278	333	611	116	245	19	6	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	314	281	71	15	2	1	27	73	2	3	1	253	323	331	654	78	326	23	9	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	MLB MLE	Oakland Athletics	—	18	17	4	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	0	235	278	353	631	118	267	11	6	282	77	-0	+0	-0	+0	+0	-0.0
2015	27	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	90	84	19	1	1	1	4	29	1	0	1	226	270	298	567	71	317	32	4	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	MLB MLE	Oakland Athletics	—	50	48	4	0	0	0	1	13	0	2	0	83	102	83	185		114	26	2	87	-55	-9	+0	+1	+1	+1	-0.7
2016	28	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	137	130	25	4	0	1	5	33	0	0	0	192	222	246	468	54	250	24	4	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	222	206	40	11	0	1	12	50	4	4	1	194	252	262	514	68	255	23	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	AAA MLE	Reno Aces	—	61	56	14	2	0	0	5	7	0	0	1	250	311	286	597	36	283	11	8	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	AA MLE	Jackson Generals	—	102	90	15	3	0	1	9	19	1	0	1	167	250	233	483	67	194	19	9	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	29	27	2	0	0	0	1	14	0	0	0	74	107	74	181		113	48	3	70	-66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	210	196	35	8	0	5	8	62	3	1	0	179	222	296	518	117	224	30	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	ROK MLE	GCL Twins	—	175	154	25	6	1	1	10	42	6	6	0	162	241	234	475	71	212	24	6	205	25	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	ROK RAW	GCL Twins	—	175	147	30	8	1	1	17	29	6	6	0	204	312	293	604	88	244	17	10	276	25	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A MLE	2 teams	—	284	261	60	10	2	5	15	53	5	5	3	230	285	341	626	111	270	19	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A RAW	2 teams	—	284	251	69	13	2	6	25	39	5	5	3	275	352	414	767	139	304	14	9	341	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	525	490	115	25	3	4	24	142	3	20	4	235	275	322	597	88	320	27	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A+ RAW	Stockton Ports	—	525	478	131	30	4	5	35	110	3	20	4	274	327	385	712	111	344	21	7	315	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	515	467	89	14	3	5	32	122	6	6	5	191	251	266	517	75	246	24	6	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	515	452	102	18	3	6	47	94	6	6	5	226	307	319	626	93	271	18	9	283	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	476	428	86	16	1	8	30	113	11	7	4	201	271	299	570	98	252	24	6	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA RAW	Midland RockHounds	—	476	416	100	20	1	9	42	89	11	7	4	240	326	358	684	118	283	19	9	308	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	335	305	63	13	1	6	21	62	5	2	0	207	269	315	584	108	238	19	6	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	335	294	73	17	1	6	31	48	5	2	0	248	329	374	703	126	277	14	9	315	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	314	281	71	15	2	1	27	73	2	3	1	253	323	331	654	78	332	23	9	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA RAW	Sacramento River Cats	—	314	273	81	18	3	2	35	56	2	3	1	297	381	407	787	110	361	18	11	352	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	108	101	23	1	2	1	5	31	1	0	1	228	271	307	578	79	314	29	5	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	108	100	26	2	2	1	6	25	1	0	1	260	308	350	658	90	333	23	6	294	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	187	178	29	4	0	1	6	46	0	2	0	163	190	202	392	39	214	25	3	175	4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	187	176	34	5	0	1	8	39	0	2	0	193	228	239	467	45	243	21	4	211	4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	222	206	40	11	0	1	12	50	4	4	1	194	252	262	514	68	252	23	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA RAW	Charlotte Knights	—	222	200	50	14	0	2	18	40	4	4	1	250	324	350	674	100	304	18	8	308	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	AA MLE	2 teams	—	163	147	30	6	0	1	13	25	1	0	2	204	273	265	539	61	236	15	8	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	AA RAW	2 teams	—	163	139	34	7	0	1	21	20	1	0	2	245	348	317	664	72	275	12	13	307	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	29	27	2	0	0	0	1	14	0	0	0	74	107	74	181		143	48	3	70	-66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	AAA RAW	Durham Bulls	—	29	27	2	0	0	0	1	12	0	0	0	74	107	74	181		125	41	3	86	-66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	210	196	35	8	0	5	8	62	3	1	0	179	222	296	518	117	229	30	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	AAA RAW	Iowa Cubs	—	210	191	46	11	0	8	13	53	3	1	0	241	300	424	724	183	288	25	6	317	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	ROK MLE	GCL Twins	—	175	157	25	6	1	1	10	42	6	6	0	159	241	229	470	70	199	24	6	205	25	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A MLE	2 teams	—	284	262	60	10	2	5	15	53	5	5	3	229	285	340	624	111	262	19	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	525	493	115	25	3	4	24	142	3	20	4	233	275	320	595	87	313	27	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	515	472	89	14	3	5	32	122	6	6	5	189	251	263	514	74	237	24	6	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	476	432	86	16	1	8	30	113	11	7	4	199	271	296	567	97	245	24	6	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	335	306	63	13	1	6	21	62	5	2	0	206	269	314	583	108	232	19	6	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	314	282	71	15	2	1	27	73	2	3	1	252	323	330	652	78	326	23	9	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	108	101	23	1	2	1	5	31	1	0	1	228	271	307	578	79	309	29	5	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	187	179	29	4	0	1	6	46	0	2	0	162	190	201	391	39	214	25	3	175	4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	222	204	40	11	0	1	12	50	4	4	1	196	252	265	517	69	255	23	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	AA MLE	2 teams	—	163	148	30	6	0	1	13	25	1	0	2	203	273	264	537	61	227	15	8	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	29	28	2	0	0	0	1	14	0	0	0	71	107	71	179		113	48	3	70	-66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	210	197	35	8	0	5	8	62	3	1	0	178	222	294	517	117	224	30	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	68	65	8	0	1	0	2	15	0	2	0	123	149	154	303	31	160	22	3	137	51	-10	+0	+0	+1	+1	-0.7
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	621	77	0	10	0	19	143	0	19	0	124	150	156	306	32	161	22	3	137	51	-93	+4	+2	+10	+14	-6.4
Career	—	MLE		—	3543	3241	668	129	15	39	204	835	47	56	21	206	263	291	554	85	263	24	6	244	51	-10	+0	+0	+1	+1	-0.7
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	595	123	24	3	7	37	153	9	10	4	207	264	292	556	86	264	24	6	244	51	-93	+4	+2	+10	+14	-6.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2021 AAAIowa Cubs · 210 PAwOBA .311 → .226 (−85)K% 25.2% → 29.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.24%	÷1.032	×1.200	—	—	29.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.19%	÷1.023	×0.690	—	×0.942	3.93%
HBP% /PA	1.43%	—	×0.940	—	×0.942	1.26%
Singles /BIP	19.57%	÷1.039	×0.930	×0.955	×0.942	15.75%
Doubles /BIP	7.97%	÷0.963	×0.830	×0.955	×0.942	6.18%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.988	×0.920	×0.955	×0.942	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.80%	÷1.081	×0.700	—	×0.942	3.54%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 116, 1B 108, 2B 93, 3B 98, K 106, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 33 vs a level average of 27.2 → −5.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.955.

Result: wOBA .311 → .226; ISO .183 → .121; BABIP .288 → .224. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAADurham Bulls · 29 PAwOBA .087 → .070 (−17)K% 41.4% → 48.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	41.38%	÷1.020	×1.200	—	—	48.67%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.45%	÷0.998	×0.690	—	×0.962	2.29%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	0.00%
Singles /BIP	13.33%	÷0.986	×0.930	—	×0.962	12.09%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.006	×0.830	—	×0.962	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.025	×0.970	—	×0.962	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.128	×0.840	—	×0.962	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 97, 2B 101, 3B 105, K 104, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .087 → .070; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .125 → .113. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAJackson Generals · 102 PAwOBA .279 → .224 (−55)K% 14.7% → 18.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.71%	÷0.972	×1.220	—	—	18.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.73%	÷1.003	×0.680	—	×0.948	8.82%
HBP% /PA	0.98%	—	×0.840	—	×0.948	0.78%
Singles /BIP	17.14%	÷0.982	×0.920	×0.982	×0.948	14.94%
Doubles /BIP	5.71%	÷1.022	×0.910	×0.982	×0.948	4.74%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.145	×0.880	×0.982	×0.948	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.43%	÷0.954	×0.800	—	×0.948	1.14%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 96, 2B 104, 3B 129, K 94, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 24.8 → −5.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.

Result: wOBA .279 → .224; ISO .082 → .070; BABIP .225 → .194. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAAReno Aces · 61 PAwOBA .342 → .268 (−74)K% 8.2% → 10.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.20%	÷0.991	×1.290	—	—	10.67%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.48%	÷1.069	×0.710	—	×0.972	7.41%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×0.972	0.00%
Singles /BIP	28.57%	÷1.024	×0.900	×0.985	×0.972	24.05%
Doubles /BIP	6.12%	÷1.117	×0.810	×0.985	×0.972	4.25%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.985	×0.972	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.044	×0.780	—	×0.972	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 105, 2B 123, 3B 130, K 98, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.

Result: wOBA .342 → .268; ISO .056 → .039; BABIP .347 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAACharlotte Knights · 222 PAwOBA .300 → .236 (−64)K% 18.0% → 22.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.02%	÷0.952	×1.200	—	—	22.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.11%	÷1.008	×0.690	—	×0.982	5.45%
HBP% /PA	1.80%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	1.66%
Singles /BIP	21.25%	÷1.012	×0.930	×0.950	×0.982	18.21%
Doubles /BIP	8.75%	÷0.958	×0.830	×0.950	×0.982	7.08%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.077	×0.970	×0.950	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.25%	÷1.150	×0.840	—	×0.982	0.90%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 130, 1B 102, 2B 92, 3B 115, K 90, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .300 → .236; ISO .100 → .076; BABIP .304 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAANashville Sounds · 137 PAwOBA .249 → .207 (−43)K% 19.0% → 24.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.98%	÷1.004	×1.290	—	—	24.38%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.11%	÷0.979	×0.710	—	×0.992	3.68%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.53%	÷1.035	×0.900	×1.005	×0.992	20.41%
Doubles /BIP	4.90%	÷0.898	×0.810	×1.005	×0.992	4.41%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.015	×0.810	×1.005	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.98%	÷0.856	×0.780	—	×0.992	0.89%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 71, 1B 107, 2B 80, 3B 103, K 101, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.

Result: wOBA .249 → .207; ISO .062 → .054; BABIP .287 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAANashville Sounds · 90 PAwOBA .293 → .246 (−47)K% 25.6% → 31.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.56%	÷1.034	×1.290	—	—	31.87%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.56%	÷1.018	×0.710	—	×1.003	3.89%
HBP% /PA	1.11%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	1.09%
Singles /BIP	30.00%	÷0.953	×0.900	×0.982	×1.003	27.90%
Doubles /BIP	3.33%	÷1.063	×0.810	×0.982	×1.003	2.50%
Triples /BIP	1.67%	÷0.952	×0.810	×0.982	×1.003	1.40%
Home runs /BIP	1.67%	÷0.843	×0.780	—	×1.003	1.55%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 69, 1B 91, 2B 113, 3B 90, K 107, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.

Result: wOBA .293 → .246; ISO .084 → .068; BABIP .350 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAASacramento River Cats · 314 PAwOBA .348 → .296 (−52)K% 17.8% → 23.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.83%	÷0.998	×1.290	—	—	23.06%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.15%	÷0.953	×0.710	—	×1.018	8.46%
HBP% /PA	0.64%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.64%
Singles /BIP	26.73%	÷0.975	×0.900	×0.983	×1.018	24.71%
Doubles /BIP	8.29%	÷0.929	×0.810	×0.983	×1.018	7.24%
Triples /BIP	1.38%	÷1.072	×0.810	×0.983	×1.018	1.05%
Home runs /BIP	0.92%	÷1.092	×0.780	—	×1.018	0.67%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 95, 2B 86, 3B 114, K 100, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.

Result: wOBA .348 → .296; ISO .110 → .089; BABIP .361 → .326. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).