Nick Quintana
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 23 | A/ROK2 orgs | 375 | .186/.320/.328 | 9 | 4 | 37 | — | .140/.239/.241 |
| 2022 | 24 | AA/A+CIN | 440 | .245/.358/.387 | 10 | 5 | 64 | — | .197/.283/.294 |
| 2023 | 25 | AACIN | 137 | .135/.294/.243 | 2 | 0 | 22 | — | .110/.228/.203 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 21 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 162 | 146 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 51 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 158 | 231 | 226 | 457 | 68 | 229 | 31 | 8 | 212 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 347 | 286 | 56 | 16 | 0 | 9 | 51 | 73 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 196 | 331 | 346 | 678 | 150 | 227 | 21 | 15 | 311 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | ROK | FCL Tigers West | — | 28 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 179 | 120 | 299 | 40 | 167 | 46 | 7 | 154 | -60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 222 | 189 | 44 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 48 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 233 | 344 | 354 | 698 | 122 | 292 | 22 | 13 | 320 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ | Dayton Dragons | — | 218 | 183 | 47 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 33 | 52 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 257 | 373 | 421 | 794 | 164 | 325 | 24 | 15 | 357 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 137 | 111 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 135 | 294 | 243 | 537 | 108 | 176 | 26 | 14 | 262 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 162 | 150 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 120 | 175 | 180 | 355 | 60 | 198 | 40 | 6 | 162 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 347 | 303 | 45 | 12 | 0 | 7 | 34 | 101 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 149 | 250 | 257 | 507 | 109 | 191 | 29 | 10 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers West | — | 28 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 107 | 38 | 146 | 122 | 68 | 4 | 80 | -60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 222 | 199 | 38 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 58 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 191 | 271 | 281 | 553 | 90 | 253 | 26 | 9 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | A+ MLE | Dayton Dragons | — | 218 | 192 | 39 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 63 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 203 | 295 | 307 | 602 | 104 | 274 | 29 | 11 | 274 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 137 | 118 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 46 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 228 | 203 | 431 | 93 | 159 | 34 | 9 | 200 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 162 | 150 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 120 | 175 | 180 | 355 | 60 | 198 | 40 | 6 | 162 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 162 | 146 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 51 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 158 | 231 | 226 | 457 | 68 | 229 | 31 | 8 | 212 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 375 | 329 | 47 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 35 | 119 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 143 | 242 | 246 | 488 | 103 | 194 | 32 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 375 | 311 | 58 | 17 | 0 | 9 | 53 | 86 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 186 | 320 | 328 | 648 | 141 | 224 | 23 | 14 | 300 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 440 | 391 | 78 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 43 | 121 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 199 | 285 | 304 | 590 | 105 | 266 | 28 | 10 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 440 | 372 | 91 | 23 | 0 | 10 | 62 | 100 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 245 | 358 | 387 | 746 | 142 | 308 | 23 | 14 | 339 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 137 | 118 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 46 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 228 | 203 | 431 | 93 | 155 | 34 | 9 | 200 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA RAW | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 137 | 111 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 135 | 294 | 243 | 537 | 108 | 176 | 26 | 14 | 262 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 162 | 151 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 119 | 175 | 179 | 354 | 60 | 198 | 40 | 6 | 162 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 375 | 329 | 47 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 35 | 119 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 143 | 242 | 246 | 488 | 103 | 186 | 32 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 440 | 390 | 78 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 43 | 121 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 200 | 285 | 305 | 591 | 105 | 263 | 28 | 10 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | — | 137 | 118 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 46 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 228 | 203 | 431 | 93 | 159 | 34 | 9 | 200 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1114 | 988 | 156 | 39 | 1 | 18 | 99 | 351 | 19 | 12 | 6 | 158 | 248 | 254 | 502 | 96 | 220 | 32 | 9 | 227 | 40 | -80 | +0 | +0 | +4 | +24 | -5.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 576 | 92 | 23 | 1 | 11 | 58 | 205 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 160 | 250 | 260 | 510 | 101 | 223 | 32 | 9 | 227 | 40 | -47 | -0 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -3.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 137 PAwOBA .258 → .200 (−58)K% 26.3% → 33.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.28% | ÷0.961 | ×1.220 | — | — | 33.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.87% | ÷1.069 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.988 | 8.72% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.38% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.988 | 3.63% |
| Singles /BIP | 9.33% | ÷0.986 | ×0.920 | ×0.998 | ×0.988 | 8.59% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.00% | ÷1.004 | ×0.910 | ×0.998 | ×0.988 | 7.15% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.880 | ×0.998 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.67% | ÷1.017 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 2.07% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 97, 2B 101, 3B 130, K 92, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.
Result: wOBA .258 → .200; ISO .108 → .090; BABIP .176 → .159. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 222 PAwOBA .313 → .252 (−61)K% 21.6% → 26.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.62% | ÷1.010 | ×1.220 | — | — | 26.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.06% | ÷1.019 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.998 | 8.70% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.35% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.998 | 1.13% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.57% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | ×0.975 | ×0.998 | 18.37% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.80% | ÷1.084 | ×0.910 | ×0.975 | ×0.998 | 6.37% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.912 | ×0.880 | ×0.975 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.84% | ÷0.990 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 2.29% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 100, 2B 117, 3B 82, K 102, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.975.
Result: wOBA .313 → .252; ISO .122 → .100; BABIP .292 → .253. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Dayton Dragons · 218 PAwOBA .350 → .274 (−76)K% 23.9% → 28.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.85% | ÷1.047 | ×1.270 | — | — | 28.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.14% | ÷0.958 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 10.97% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.46% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.978 | 0.35% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.14% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | ×1.032 | ×0.978 | 20.51% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.16% | ÷1.217 | ×0.810 | ×1.032 | ×0.978 | 6.16% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.028 | ×0.850 | ×1.032 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.58% | ÷1.058 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 3.39% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 100, 2B 143, 3B 106, K 109, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.
Result: wOBA .350 → .274; ISO .164 → .116; BABIP .325 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 347 PAwOBA .307 → .234 (−72)K% 21.0% → 29.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.04% | ÷0.988 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.70% | ÷1.017 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 9.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.02% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 1.54% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.55% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | ×0.973 | ×0.980 | 12.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.51% | ÷0.992 | ×0.830 | ×0.973 | ×0.980 | 5.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.016 | ×0.910 | ×0.973 | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.23% | ÷0.937 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 3.54% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 100, 2B 98, 3B 103, K 98, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.
Result: wOBA .307 → .234; ISO .150 → .120; BABIP .227 → .191. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Tigers West · 28 PAwOBA .151 → .080 (−71)K% 46.4% → 66.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 46.43% | ÷1.010 | ×1.440 | — | — | 66.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.14% | ÷1.066 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.955 | 3.97% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.57% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 2.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷0.984 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.955 | 6.63% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.027 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 5.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.949 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.906 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 81, 1B 97, 2B 105, 3B 90, K 102, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .151 → .080; ISO .040 → .017; BABIP .167 → .122. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 162 PAwOBA .210 → .162 (−48)K% 31.5% → 40.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.48% | ÷1.063 | ×1.360 | — | — | 40.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.02% | ÷0.974 | ×0.690 | — | — | 5.69% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.62% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.84% | ÷1.025 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | — | 14.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.885 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | — | 4.69% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.05% | ÷0.904 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | — | 1.01% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.05% | ÷0.895 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.94% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 105, 2B 77, 3B 81, K 113, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .210 → .162; ISO .068 → .057; BABIP .229 → .198. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).