Yobal Rodriguez

P DSL White Sox

Age 19 RHP 6'2" / 155 lbs ROK peak 0.3 · 2028

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

Scout OFP50ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	17	ROKCWS	13	10	30	2.97	2.21	25.4%	10.0%	—	K 17.3% · BB 12.5% · FIP 3.23
2027PROJ	19	MLBCWS	3	3	18	4.68	4.68	21.2%	10.8%	0.0
2028PROJ49% MLB	20	MLBCWS	3	3	14	4.56	4.50	21.8%	10.1%	0.1

Next 2 projected WAR 0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Scouting grades · 20-80

Stuff50Control55

CompsMoises Castillo (age 19) · Edwin Jimenez (age 19) · Fraynel Nova (age 20)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 122114vR 106

ERA4.68

FIP4.68

K%21.2%

BB%10.8%

K-BB%10.3%

Proj IP18

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 18 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

OFP—50

STUF—50

CTRL—55

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	17	ROK MLE	DSL White Sox	13	10	30	130	33	13	0	77%	2.3	17.3%	12.5%	4.8%	0.0%	2.97	3.23	—
2025	17	ROK MLE	DSL White Sox	13	10	30	130	33	13	0	77%	2.3	17.3%	12.5%	4.8%	0.0%	2.97	3.23	—
2025	17	ROK RAW	DSL White Sox	13	10	30	130	33	13	0	77%	2.3	25.4%	10.0%	15.4%	0.0%	2.97	2.21	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	19	MLB	CWS	3	3	18	76	16	8	2	100%	6.0	21.2%	10.8%	10.3%	2.9%	4.68	4.68	+0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	20	MLB MLE	CWS	5	5	29	121	26	12	4	100%	5.7	21.8%	10.1%	11.7%	2.9%	4.56	4.50	+0.1
2028	20	MLB CTX	CWS	3	3	14	59	13	6	2	100%	4.7	21.8%	10.1%	11.7%	2.9%	4.56	4.50	+0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		3	3	14	60	13	6	2	100%	4.7	21.8%	10.1%	11.7%	2.9%	4.56	4.12	+0.1
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		43	43	200	844	184	85	28	100%	4.6	21.8%	10.1%	11.7%	2.9%	4.56	4.12	+1.8
Career	—	MLE		13	10	30	130	22	16	0	77%	2.3	17.3%	12.5%	4.8%	0.0%	2.97	3.23	+0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		86	66	200	857	148	107	0	77%	2.3	17.3%	12.5%	4.8%	0.0%	2.97	3.23	+0.9

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Yobal Rodriguez (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.68	21.2%	10.8%	2.9%	—	4.50	21.8%	11.7%	29	-0.18	—	—	—
Moises Castillo R 2024 · 4.58 FIP	19	SP-	4.58	18.1%	11.7%	2.8%	.269	4.06	19.4%	4.9%	67	-0.52	3.76	104	81
Edwin Jimenez R 2021 · 4.03 FIP	19	SP-	4.03	19.3%	8.9%	2.6%	.330	4.79	16.5%	8.0%	277	+0.76	4.03	406	80
Fraynel Nova R 2022 · 3.83 FIP	20	SP-	3.83	16.4%	7.9%	2.0%	.296	4.17	14.9%	4.9%	110	+0.34	3.38	129	80
Richard Fernandez R 2022 · 5.10 FIP	19	SP	5.10	15.1%	9.3%	3.8%	.309	4.25	16.5%	-0.2%	85	-0.85	3.66	137	80
Aneury Lora R 2022 · 3.95 FIP	18	SP	3.95	16.6%	11.1%	1.5%	.339	3.72	15.1%	5.9%	114	-0.23	3.69	192	79
Carlos Jimenez R 2021 · 4.08 FIP	19	SP-	4.08	20.6%	12.9%	2.0%	.274	5.21	20.4%	-0.0%	141	+1.13	4.07	257	79
Ricardo Yan R 2022 · 4.00 FIP	19	SP	4.00	20.5%	14.6%	1.4%	.271	4.43	20.2%	4.3%	211	+0.43	3.62	300	78
Jharold Clemente R 2023 · 4.97 FIP	20	SP	4.97	17.5%	13.6%	3.0%	.258	5.11	13.3%	4.3%	92	+0.14	4.09	116	78
Chad Donato R 2017 · 3.85 FIP	22	SP-	3.85	20.9%	11.4%	2.0%	.333	3.99	21.4%	12.6%	184	+0.14	2.89	439	78
Nicholas Economos R 2015 · 4.95 FIP	20	SP-	4.95	15.3%	10.7%	3.3%	.233	5.28	10.4%	0.6%	57	+0.33	4.40	223	78
Carson Fulmer R 2015 · 4.15 FIP	21	SP	4.15	21.4%	11.5%	2.5%	.259	4.96	17.1%	4.0%	364	+0.81	3.88	910	77
Reny Artiles R 2021 · 4.34 FIP	19	SP	4.34	24.2%	12.4%	3.1%	.419	5.64	14.8%	-6.5%	109	+1.30	4.34	165	77
Jonathan Stiever R 2018 · 4.39 FIP	21	SP	4.39	22.9%	9.7%	3.6%	.308	4.25	20.7%	14.2%	219	-0.14	4.23	247	77
Zach Haake R 2018 · 4.13 FIP	21	SP	4.13	16.4%	8.6%	2.4%	.205	4.54	20.2%	6.8%	121	+0.41	3.44	272	77
Gilberto Batista R 2024 · 4.00 FIP	19	SP-	4.00	16.9%	11.4%	1.6%	.308	5.86	14.7%	4.9%	172	+1.86	3.63	250	77
Jordany Ventura R 2019 · 4.08 FIP	19	SP	4.08	16.8%	8.9%	2.3%	.264	—	—	—	—	—	4.08	219	77
Tahnaj Thomas R 2018 · 5.06 FIP	19	SP-	5.06	23.0%	15.6%	3.5%	.268	6.04	17.0%	2.7%	61	+0.98	3.81	214	77
Clarke Schmidt R 2018 · 3.53 FIP	22	SP	3.53	23.1%	8.5%	2.4%	.324	3.26	21.3%	13.1%	108	-0.27	2.77	537	77
Ryan Fernandez R 2018 · 4.44 FIP	20	SP-	4.44	19.2%	6.8%	3.8%	.357	3.37	20.8%	13.2%	53	-1.07	3.02	363	77
Gabe Bierman R 2021 · 4.80 FIP	21	SP-	4.80	21.3%	11.8%	3.6%	.277	4.51	16.2%	4.0%	187	-0.29	4.03	328	76