Cesar Sanchez

P ACL Dodgers

Age 21 RHP 6'3" / 190 lbs ROK peak 0.3 · 2028

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	19	ROKDSL LAD Mega	2	2	6	8.53	5.31	12.1%	9.1%	—	K 12.1% · BB 9.1% · FIP 4.89
2026	20	ROKLAD	10	6	22	4.91	3.46	34.7%	8.2%	—	K 23.6% · BB 10.2% · FIP 5.54
2027PROJ	21	MLBLAD	2	2	13	4.44	4.44	23.4%	9.9%	0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	22	MLBLAD	2	2	10	4.31	4.24	24.3%	9.2%	0.1

Next 2 projected WAR 0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 -0 / P90 3, comp-based) · star 3% · didn't stick 90%

CompsCarson Rudd (age 22) · Florencio Serrano (age 21) · Clarke Schmidt (age 22)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 118109vR 101

ERA4.44

FIP4.44

K%23.4%

BB%9.9%

K-BB%13.6%

Proj IP13

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 13 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5560

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	19	ROK MLE	DSL LAD Mega	2	2	6	33	4	3	1	100%	3.2	12.1%	9.1%	3.0%	3.0%	8.53	4.89	—
2025	19	ROK MLE	DSL LAD Mega	2	2	6	33	4	3	1	100%	3.2	12.1%	9.1%	3.0%	3.0%	8.53	4.89	—
2025	19	ROK RAW	DSL LAD Mega	2	2	6	33	4	3	1	100%	3.2	12.1%	9.1%	3.0%	3.0%	8.53	5.31	—
2026	20	ROK MLE	ACL Dodgers	10	6	22	98	34	8	4	60%	2.2	23.6%	10.2%	13.4%	5.7%	4.91	5.54	—
2026	20	ROK MLE	ACL Dodgers	10	6	22	98	34	8	4	60%	2.2	23.6%	10.2%	13.4%	5.7%	4.91	5.54	—
2026	20	ROK RAW	ACL Dodgers	10	6	22	98	34	8	4	60%	2.2	34.7%	8.2%	26.5%	4.1%	4.91	3.46	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	21	MLB	LAD	2	2	13	55	13	5	2	100%	6.5	23.4%	9.9%	13.6%	3.1%	4.44	4.44	+0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	22	MLB MLE	LAD	4	4	21	88	21	8	3	100%	5.2	24.3%	9.2%	15.2%	3.0%	4.31	4.24	+0.2
2028	22	MLB CTX	LAD	2	2	10	42	10	4	1	100%	5.0	24.3%	9.2%	15.2%	3.0%	4.31	4.24	+0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		2	2	10	43	11	4	1	100%	5.1	24.3%	9.2%	15.2%	3.0%	4.31	3.86	+0.1
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		39	39	200	844	215	78	20	100%	5.1	24.3%	9.2%	15.2%	3.0%	4.31	3.86	+2.5
Career	—	MLE		12	8	28	131	27	13	7	67%	2.4	20.7%	9.9%	10.8%	5.0%	5.72	5.37	+0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		85	56	200	925	191	92	47	67%	2.4	20.7%	9.9%	10.8%	5.0%	5.72	5.37	+1.6

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Cesar Sanchez (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.44	23.4%	9.9%	3.1%	—	4.24	24.3%	15.2%	21	-0.20	—	—	—
Carson Rudd R 2021 · 3.39 FIP	22	SP-	3.39	25.4%	10.6%	2.0%	.351	5.24	21.6%	5.6%	193	+1.85	3.39	242	83
Florencio Serrano R 2021 · 3.84 FIP	21	SP-	3.84	19.3%	8.5%	2.4%	.264	4.80	14.1%	3.4%	117	+0.96	3.84	206	80
Clarke Schmidt R 2018 · 3.53 FIP	22	SP	3.53	23.1%	8.5%	2.4%	.324	3.26	21.3%	13.1%	108	-0.27	2.77	537	80
Caleb Sampen R 2018 · 3.46 FIP	22	SP	3.46	21.7%	8.3%	2.1%	.358	3.49	15.2%	6.8%	139	+0.03	3.09	213	79
Jeronimo Castro R 2018 · 3.45 FIP	21	SP-	3.45	25.2%	8.2%	2.6%	.362	3.85	20.1%	7.9%	35	+0.40	3.19	158	79
Casey Legumina R 2021 · 4.08 FIP	24	SP-	4.08	23.3%	9.3%	3.2%	.260	4.33	20.2%	11.3%	189	+0.25	3.54	355	79
Connor Cooke R 2022 · 3.35 FIP	22	SP-	3.35	23.7%	8.4%	2.2%	.350	4.10	24.4%	11.8%	56	+0.75	2.93	103	78
Hunter Gregory R 2022 · 3.90 FIP	23	SP-	3.90	21.2%	8.7%	2.7%	.374	4.56	20.4%	7.9%	188	+0.66	3.84	249	78
Ryan Fernandez R 2018 · 4.44 FIP	20	SP-	4.44	19.2%	6.8%	3.8%	.357	3.37	20.8%	13.2%	53	-1.07	3.02	363	77
Wilmer Ortega R 2022 · 4.01 FIP	21	SP-	4.01	18.2%	7.9%	2.6%	.304	5.81	16.1%	1.8%	30	+1.80	3.62	158	77
Chad Donato R 2017 · 3.85 FIP	22	SP-	3.85	20.9%	11.4%	2.0%	.333	3.99	21.4%	12.6%	184	+0.14	2.89	439	76
Miguelangel Boadas R 2024 · 3.55 FIP	21	SP-	3.55	20.6%	11.0%	1.4%	.319	—	—	—	—	—	2.64	129	76
Colin Fields R 2023 · 3.62 FIP	23	SP-	3.62	20.5%	10.3%	1.7%	.246	3.86	22.0%	13.3%	208	+0.24	2.87	254	76
Eiberson Castellano R 2022 · 3.94 FIP	21	SW	3.94	21.8%	10.3%	2.5%	.266	3.93	22.0%	12.3%	189	-0.01	3.67	386	75
Grant Holman R 2021 · 5.55 FIP	21	SP-	5.55	18.2%	7.7%	5.5%	.308	3.66	22.2%	14.1%	133	-1.89	3.02	203	75
Chris Campos R 2023 · 4.91 FIP	22	SP-	4.91	21.0%	11.8%	3.8%	.364	4.57	18.6%	11.6%	249	-0.34	4.54	318	75
Ray Gaither R 2022 · 4.85 FIP	24	SP-	4.85	21.9%	13.2%	3.5%	.314	4.34	18.3%	5.8%	123	-0.51	3.84	164	75
Gabe Bierman R 2021 · 4.80 FIP	21	SP-	4.80	21.3%	11.8%	3.6%	.277	4.51	16.2%	4.0%	187	-0.29	4.03	328	74
Jared Ruxer R 2015 · 4.16 FIP	23	SP-	4.16	17.3%	10.6%	2.1%	.333	4.29	14.9%	7.5%	240	+0.13	3.39	270	74
Kobe Robinson R 2022 · 4.49 FIP	21	SW	4.49	23.2%	14.3%	2.8%	.296	3.44	18.8%	4.9%	84	-1.05	2.98	107	74