Wilmer Ortega
P FCL Cardinals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 21 | ROKSTL | 14 | 7 | 34 | 3.18 | 2.81 | 26.8% | 6.3% | — | K 18.2% · BB 7.9% · FIP 4.01 | |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 17 | 1 | 28 | 4.50 | 4.17 | 18.9% | 10.2% | — | K 14.2% · BB 18.2% · FIP 6.01 | |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 12 | 0 | 14 | 6.43 | 4.17 | 30.0% | 6.7% | — | K 18.5% · BB 9.1% · FIP 5.55 | |
| 2025 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBSTL | — | — | 0 | 4.33 | 4.33 | 23.2% | 9.2% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ36% MLB | 27 | MLBSTL | 7 | 0 | 7 | 4.35 | 4.37 | 23.2% | 9.3% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals Blue | 12 | 12 | 55 | 233 | 39 | 17 | 1 | 100% | 4.6 | 11.4% | 9.1% | 2.3% | 0.6% | 2.77 | 3.62 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Cardinals Blue | 12 | 12 | 55 | 233 | 39 | 17 | 1 | 100% | 4.6 | 16.7% | 7.3% | 9.4% | 0.4% | 2.77 | 2.85 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals Red | 11 | 11 | 39 | 180 | 39 | 26 | 2 | 100% | 3.5 | 14.7% | 18.1% | -3.3% | 1.5% | 4.85 | 4.95 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Cardinals Red | 11 | 11 | 39 | 180 | 39 | 26 | 2 | 100% | 3.5 | 21.7% | 14.4% | 7.2% | 1.1% | 4.85 | 3.77 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Cardinals | 14 | 7 | 34 | 142 | 38 | 9 | 3 | 50% | 2.4 | 18.2% | 7.9% | 10.3% | 2.6% | 3.18 | 4.01 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Cardinals | 14 | 7 | 34 | 142 | 38 | 9 | 3 | 50% | 2.4 | 26.8% | 6.3% | 20.4% | 2.1% | 3.18 | 2.81 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 1 | 28 | 127 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 6% | 1.6 | 14.2% | 18.2% | -3.9% | 3.3% | 4.50 | 6.01 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 17 | 1 | 28 | 127 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 6% | 1.6 | 18.9% | 10.2% | 8.7% | 2.4% | 4.50 | 4.17 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 14 | 60 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.5% | 9.1% | 9.5% | 5.2% | 6.43 | 5.55 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 14 | 60 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.5% | 9.1% | 9.5% | 5.2% | 6.43 | 5.55 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 14 | 60 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 30.0% | 6.7% | 23.3% | 5.0% | 6.43 | 4.17 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | STL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.2% | 9.2% | 14.1% | 3.0% | 4.33 | 4.33 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | STL | 17 | 0 | 18 | 76 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 9.3% | 14.0% | 3.1% | 4.35 | 4.37 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | STL | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 9.3% | 14.0% | 3.1% | 4.35 | 4.37 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 9.3% | 14.0% | 3.1% | 4.35 | 3.99 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 182 | 91 | 30 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 9.3% | 14.0% | 3.1% | 4.35 | 3.99 | +1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 66 | 31 | 170 | 742 | 108 | 94 | 15 | 47% | 2.6 | 14.6% | 12.6% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 3.91 | 4.58 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 77 | 36 | 200 | 871 | 127 | 110 | 18 | 47% | 2.6 | 14.6% | 12.6% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 3.91 | 4.58 | +0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ROKFCL Cardinals · 13 IPFIP 3.71 → 5.55 (+1.84)K% 27.3% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.680 | 18.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.27% | — | ×1.250 | 9.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.64% | ÷0.975 | ×1.400 | 5.22% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.71 → 5.55, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 APalm Beach Cardinals · 17 IPFIP 4.83 → 6.01 (+1.18)K% 19.2% → 14.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.23% | — | ×0.740 | 14.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.38% | — | ×1.180 | 18.15% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷1.010 | ×1.300 | 3.30% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 4.83 → 6.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Cardinals · 11 IPFIP 2.93 → 3.94 (+1.01)K% 18.4% → 12.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.37% | — | ×0.680 | 12.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.04% | — | ×1.250 | 2.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.04% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.86% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.93 → 3.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Cardinals · 34 IPFIP 2.80 → 4.01 (+1.20)K% 26.8% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.76% | — | ×0.680 | 18.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.34% | — | ×1.250 | 7.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.11% | ÷1.127 | ×1.400 | 2.62% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).
Result: FIP 2.80 → 4.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Cardinals Red · 39 IPFIP 3.71 → 4.95 (+1.24)K% 21.7% → 14.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.67% | — | ×0.680 | 14.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.44% | — | ×1.250 | 18.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.11% | ÷1.060 | ×1.400 | 1.47% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 3.71 → 4.95, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKDSL Cardinals Blue · 55 IPFIP 2.85 → 3.62 (+0.78)K% 16.7% → 11.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.74% | — | ×0.680 | 11.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.30% | — | ×1.250 | 9.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.43% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.60% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.85 → 3.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).