Trennor O'Donnell

P Greenville Drive
Age 26 RHP 6'7" / 240 lbs A+
Overview
A+PROSPECT
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202423ASalem Red Sox206634.002.4724.7%7.3%—K 18.2% · BB 8.6% · FIP 3.45
202524ASalem Red Sox72234.703.2722.6%12.3%—K 16.8% · BB 14.5% · FIP 4.27
202625MIX3 levels154386.695.9721.3%9.8%—K 11.5% · BB 12.7% · FIP 8.53
2027PROJ26MLBBOS——05.355.3517.1%11.6%—
2028PROJ37% MLB27MLBBOS9095.275.2817.7%11.4%-0.1
Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%
CompsTyler Yates (age 26) · Colby Morris (age 25) · Cameron Foster (age 25)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 135127vR 119
ERA5.35
FIP5.35
K%17.1%
BB%11.6%
K-BB%5.5%
Proj IP16
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 16 IP
K: -0.7 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-1KBB: -0.6 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-1BBCONTACT: -0.8 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-1CONTACTSTAM: +0.7 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.15 (16 IP)-0.1WAR
-0.1-0.12728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†4040

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202423A MLESalem Red Sox206632887121330%3.118.2%8.6%9.6%1.5%4.003.45—
202423A MLESalem Red Sox206632887121330%3.118.2%8.6%9.6%1.5%4.003.45—
202423A RAWSalem Red Sox206632887121330%3.124.7%7.3%17.4%1.0%4.002.47—
202524A MLESalem Red Sox72231062413129%3.316.8%14.5%2.3%1.4%4.704.27—
202524A MLESalem Red Sox72231062413129%3.316.8%14.5%2.3%1.4%4.704.27—
202524A RAWSalem Red Sox72231062413129%3.322.6%12.3%10.4%0.9%4.703.27—
202625MIX MLE3 levels1543816435161027%2.511.5%12.7%-1.1%8.8%6.698.53—
202625MIX MLE3 levels1543816435161027%2.511.5%12.7%-1.1%8.8%6.698.53—
202625MIX RAW3 levels1543816435161027%2.521.3%9.8%11.6%6.1%6.695.97—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202726MLBBOS——0——————17.1%11.6%5.5%3.4%5.355.35—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202827MLB MLEBOS24025106191240%1.017.7%11.4%6.3%3.4%5.275.28-0.2
202827MLB CTXBOS909387410%1.017.7%11.4%6.3%3.4%5.275.28-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW909397410%1.017.7%11.4%6.3%3.4%5.274.90-0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084415387220%1.117.7%11.4%6.3%3.4%5.274.90-0.8
Career— MLE421212455889612029%2.916.0%10.9%5.1%3.6%4.955.10-0.2
/ 200 IP— MLE6819200902144983229%2.916.0%10.9%5.1%3.6%4.955.10-1.7

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 A+Greenville Drive · 21 IPFIP 7.07 → 8.53 (+1.46)K% 15.0% → 11.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.00%—×0.77011.55%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.00%—×1.15012.65%
HR / BF /BF7.00%÷1.000×1.2508.75%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 7.07 → 8.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 ASalem RidgeYaks · 9 IPFIP 5.68 → 7.73 (+2.05)K% 27.8% → 20.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF27.78%—×0.74020.56%
BB% (unintentional) /BF2.78%—×1.1803.28%
HR / BF /BF8.33%÷1.000×1.30010.83%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 5.68 → 7.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 ROKFCL Red Sox · 7 IPFIP 1.89 → 3.31 (+1.42)K% 35.7% → 24.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF35.71%—×0.68024.29%
BB% (unintentional) /BF14.29%—×1.25017.86%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 1.89 → 3.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ASalem Red Sox · 23 IPFIP 3.26 → 4.27 (+1.01)K% 22.6% → 16.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.64%—×0.74016.75%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.26%—×1.18014.47%
HR / BF /BF0.94%÷0.891×1.3001.38%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).

Result: FIP 3.26 → 4.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ASalem Red Sox · 63 IPFIP 2.51 → 3.45 (+0.93)K% 24.7% → 18.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF24.65%—×0.74018.24%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.29%—×1.1808.60%
HR / BF /BF1.04%÷0.933×1.3001.45%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).

Result: FIP 2.51 → 3.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).