Alex Williams
P Pensacola Blue Wahoos| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 9 | 70 | 5.04 | 3.04 | 27.3% | 7.7% | — | K 20.9% · BB 8.3% · FIP 4.25 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX3 levels | 26 | 11 | 90 | 4.70 | 3.52 | 19.3% | 8.6% | — | K 16.1% · BB 9.5% · FIP 3.77 |
| 2026 | 26 | AAMIA | 20 | 18 | 86 | 5.78 | 4.44 | 23.1% | 10.6% | — | K 18.7% · BB 11.7% · FIP 5.27 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBMIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.15 | 5.15 | 17.0% | 11.1% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 28 | MLBMIA | 4 | 4 | 21 | 5.12 | 5.15 | 17.5% | 11.0% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ56% MLB | 29 | MLBMIA | 4 | 4 | 27 | 5.16 | 5.22 | 17.7% | 11.1% | 0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Marlins | 2 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2.5 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.29 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK RAW | FCL Marlins | 2 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2.5 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.10 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ MLE | Beloit Sky Carp | 21 | 21 | 100 | 428 | 107 | 35 | 16 | 100% | 4.7 | 19.2% | 9.4% | 9.8% | 5.7% | 5.06 | 5.80 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ RAW | Beloit Sky Carp | 21 | 21 | 100 | 428 | 107 | 35 | 16 | 100% | 4.7 | 25.0% | 8.2% | 16.8% | 3.7% | 5.06 | 4.09 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 9 | 70 | 300 | 82 | 23 | 7 | 36% | 2.8 | 20.9% | 8.3% | 12.6% | 3.4% | 5.04 | 4.25 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 9 | 70 | 300 | 82 | 23 | 7 | 36% | 2.8 | 20.9% | 8.3% | 12.6% | 3.4% | 5.04 | 4.25 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 9 | 70 | 300 | 82 | 23 | 7 | 36% | 2.8 | 27.3% | 7.7% | 19.7% | 2.3% | 5.04 | 3.04 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 11 | 90 | 409 | 79 | 35 | 7 | 42% | 3.5 | 16.1% | 9.5% | 6.5% | 1.5% | 4.70 | 3.77 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 11 | 90 | 409 | 79 | 35 | 7 | 42% | 3.5 | 16.1% | 9.5% | 6.5% | 1.5% | 4.70 | 3.77 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 11 | 90 | 409 | 79 | 35 | 7 | 42% | 3.5 | 19.3% | 8.6% | 10.8% | 1.7% | 4.70 | 3.52 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Pensacola Blue Wahoos | 20 | 18 | 86 | 377 | 87 | 40 | 13 | 90% | 4.3 | 18.7% | 11.7% | 7.0% | 4.1% | 5.78 | 5.27 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Pensacola Blue Wahoos | 20 | 18 | 86 | 377 | 87 | 40 | 13 | 90% | 4.3 | 18.7% | 11.7% | 7.0% | 4.1% | 5.78 | 5.27 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA RAW | Pensacola Blue Wahoos | 20 | 18 | 86 | 377 | 87 | 40 | 13 | 90% | 4.3 | 23.1% | 10.6% | 12.5% | 3.4% | 5.78 | 4.44 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | MIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 17.0% | 11.1% | 6.0% | 3.1% | 5.15 | 5.15 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIA | 9 | 9 | 56 | 238 | 42 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 17.5% | 11.0% | 6.5% | 3.2% | 5.12 | 5.15 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIA | 8 | 8 | 49 | 206 | 37 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 17.7% | 11.1% | 6.6% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 5.22 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIA | 4 | 4 | 21 | 89 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 100% | 5.2 | 17.5% | 11.0% | 6.5% | 3.2% | 5.12 | 5.15 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIA | 4 | 4 | 27 | 114 | 20 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 6.8 | 17.7% | 11.1% | 6.6% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 5.22 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 8 | 8 | 48 | 204 | 36 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.7% | 11.1% | 6.6% | 3.3% | 5.14 | 4.81 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 149 | 95 | 29 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.7% | 11.1% | 6.6% | 3.3% | 5.14 | 4.81 | +1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 94 | 61 | 350 | 1529 | 286 | 148 | 56 | 65% | 3.7 | 18.7% | 9.7% | 9.0% | 3.7% | 5.07 | 4.77 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 54 | 35 | 200 | 874 | 164 | 85 | 32 | 65% | 3.7 | 18.7% | 9.7% | 9.0% | 3.7% | 5.07 | 4.77 | +0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 86 IPFIP 4.39 → 5.27 (+0.88)K% 23.1% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.08% | — | ×0.810 | 18.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.61% | — | ×1.100 | 11.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.45% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 4.14% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.39 → 5.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 67 IPFIP 2.93 → 3.42 (+0.48)K% 20.6% → 16.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.59% | — | ×0.810 | 16.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.17% | — | ×1.100 | 8.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.98% | ÷1.103 | ×1.200 | 1.07% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 2.93 → 3.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Beloit Sky Carp · 18 IPFIP 4.28 → 5.15 (+0.87)K% 17.7% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.72% | — | ×0.770 | 13.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.13% | — | ×1.150 | 11.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷1.006 | ×1.250 | 3.14% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 4.28 → 5.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 5 IPFIP 8.03 → 9.02 (+0.99)K% 8.3% → 7.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 8.33% | — | ×0.860 | 7.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.33% | — | ×0.900 | 7.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 8.33% | ÷0.903 | ×1.100 | 10.16% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 8.03 → 9.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Beloit Sky Carp · 66 IPFIP 3.12 → 4.25 (+1.14)K% 27.2% → 20.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.17% | — | ×0.770 | 20.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.25% | — | ×1.150 | 8.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.54% | ÷0.935 | ×1.250 | 3.39% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 3.12 → 4.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 4 IPFIP 2.22 → 2.85 (+0.63)K% 29.2% → 23.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.17% | — | ×0.810 | 23.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.50% | — | ×1.100 | 13.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.064 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 2.22 → 2.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Beloit Sky Carp · 100 IPFIP 4.08 → 5.80 (+1.73)K% 25.0% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.770 | 19.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.18% | — | ×1.150 | 9.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.74% | ÷0.817 | ×1.250 | 5.72% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 63).
Result: FIP 4.08 → 5.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 58 | 17.4% | 11.1% | 1.24 | 5.14 |
| Brian Stokes ('10) | 1.0 | 52 | 14.5% | 10.1% | 1.22 | 5.27 |
| Valerio De Los Santos ('08) | 1.3 | 51 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 1.30 | 4.57 |
| Mike Matthews ('05) | 1.2 | 61 | 16.3% | 11.3% | 1.07 | 4.54 |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 59 | 18.3%* | 9.8%* | 1.20* | 4.32* |
| Daryl Patterson ('68-'74, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 46 | 18.3%* | 11.2%* | 1.27* | 5.03* |