Daniel Bucciero

3B Stockton Ports
Age 22 R/R 6'2" / 215 lbs A HR -5% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2037
Overview
APROSPECTMiLBFA 2038
OGV OFP35OGV rank#927ETA2030MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202621A+/AOAK539.276/.393/.430131585—.229/.322/.348
2027PROJMLE22MLBOAK648.216/.305/.3341212830.2
2028PROJ25% MLB23MLBOAK125.226/.314/.35532870.1
2029PROJ36% MLB24MLBOAK196.229/.316/.36344890.2
Next 3 projected WAR 0.5Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2037Service0.0First FA2038
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029MiLB2030MiLB2031MiLB2032Pre-Arb$0.9M2033Pre-Arb$0.9M2034Pre-Arb$1.0M+3
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 A+
BB%86
Chase%86
Speed66
K%40
wOBA39
Whiff%35
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 -0.3 / P90 1.5, comp-based) · star 1% · didn't stick 94%
CompsAlexander Campos (age 22) · José Caballero (age 22) · Leo Jiménez (age 22)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONpark-neutral Marcel · 210 proj PA
wRC+†83
AVG/OBP/SLG.214 / .302 / .331
PA210
HR4
K%27
BB%10
ISO118
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -4.3 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-4BATRUN: +0.4 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+0RUNFLD: -0.5 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)-1FLDPOS: +0.7 runs (Positional adjustment)+1POSREP: +4.5 runs (Replacement-level credit)+5REPTotal WAR: +0.20+0.2WAR
0.00.51.00.10.20.30.40.40.30.20.00.027282930313233343536
━ projected WAR━ paid WAR ($/8M) surplus deficit+$7M ctrl surplus
Contract
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2032
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2037
First FA Year   2038
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2029MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2030MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2031MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2032Pre-Arb$0.9M+0.4$1M+$0.6M
2033Pre-Arb$0.9M+0.3$0.8M+$0.3M
2034Pre-Arb$1.0M+0.2$0.5M+$0.0M
2035Arb-1$0.6M———
2036Arb-2$5M———
2037Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $3M $2M +$0.8M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202621 A+Lansing Lugnuts — 192158 34623 32502 43 215354335690 120295 2617 322 61 — — — — — —
202621 AStockton Ports — 347291 9014310 43869 110 309414481895 172402 2512 396 98 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202621 A+ MLELansing Lugnuts — 192167 31522 23642 43 186292275567 90278 3312 258 61 — — — — — —
202621 A MLEStockton Ports — 347304 771138 301179 110 253338388726 135364 349 313 98 — — — — — —
202621 A MLE2 teams — 539471 10716410 5318011 153 227320342661 115340 3310 293 85 — — — — — —
202621 A RAW2 teams — 539449 12420513 7513611 153 276393430822 154365 2514 369 85 — — — — — —
202621 A MLE2 teams — 539470 10716410 5318011 153 228320343662 115333 3310 293 85 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202621 A MLE2 teams — 539470 10716410 5318011 153 228320343662 115333 3310 293 85 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202722 MLB MLEOAK 0% 648570 12322412 641769 123 216305334639 118286 2710 291 83 -13 +1 -2 +2 +14 0.2
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202823 MLB MLEOAK 25% 504442 9818311 501347 92 220308345654 125287 2710 296 87 -8 +1 -1 +2 +11 0.5
202924 MLB MLEOAK 36% 542476 10619312 541427 103 223311353664 130288 2610 300 89 -7 +1 -1 +2 +12 0.6
203025 MLB MLEOAK 43% 560493 11020313 551467 103 225312357669 133289 2610 302 91 -6 +1 -1 +2 +12 0.7
203126 MLB MLEOAK 47% 578509 11521314 571497 113 225312359672 134288 2610 303 91 -6 +1 -1 +2 +13 0.8
203227 MLB MLEOAK 48% 582513 11621314 571507 103 225311359671 134288 2610 303 91 -6 +1 -1 +2 +13 0.8
203328 MLB MLEOAK 48% 576508 11321313 561507 93 223309354663 131287 2610 300 89 -8 +1 -2 +2 +12 0.6
203429 MLB MLEOAK 48% 562495 10920312 551487 83 221306347654 127285 2610 296 86 -9 +0 -3 +2 +12 0.3
203530 MLB MLEOAK 47% 550486 10619312 531466 83 217302339641 122283 2710 291 83 -11 +0 -3 +2 +12 -0.0
203631 MLB MLEOAK 47% 533471 10018211 511446 64 213297329626 116279 2710 285 79 -13 -0 -4 +2 +12 -0.5
202823 MLB CTXOAK 25% 125110 26513 12332 21 226314355669 129297 2610 302 87 -2 +0 -0 +0 +3 0.1
202924 MLB CTXOAK 36% 196172 39814 19513 41 229316363679 134298 2610 306 89 -3 +0 -0 +1 +4 0.2
203025 MLB CTXOAK 43% 239210 481015 24623 41 231317367684 137298 2610 308 91 -3 +0 -1 +1 +5 0.3
203126 MLB CTXOAK 47% 269238 551126 26693 51 232318369687 138298 2610 309 91 -3 +1 -1 +1 +6 0.4
203227 MLB CTXOAK 48% 277245 561126 27713 51 231317369686 138297 2610 309 91 -3 +1 -1 +1 +6 0.4
203328 MLB CTXOAK 48% 278246 561126 27723 51 229315364679 135296 2610 306 89 -4 +1 -1 +1 +6 0.3
203429 MLB CTXOAK 48% 267236 541116 26703 41 227312357669 131294 2610 302 86 -4 +0 -1 +1 +6 0.2
203530 MLB CTXOAK 47% 259229 501015 25693 41 223308349656 125292 2710 297 83 -5 +0 -2 +1 +6 0.0
203631 MLB CTXOAK 47% 249220 48915 24673 32 219303338641 119288 2710 290 79 -6 -0 -2 +1 +5 -0.2
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 21591906 432861246 21056426 3610 227312357669 130296 2610 303 87 -32 +3 -9 +8 +47 1.7
/ 162G— A+C — 650574 13126414 631708 113 228313361674 132298 2610 303 87 -10 +1 -3 +2 +14 0.5
Career— MLE — 57365048 111920031126 562154675 10031 222309348657 127291 2710 297 87 -79 +6 -20 +19 +113 3.9
/ 162G— MLE — 650572 12723414 641758 114 222309350659 128292 2710 297 87 -10 +1 -3 +2 +14 0.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AStockton Ports · 347 PAwOBA .390 → .313 (−77)K% 24.8% → 33.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA24.78%÷1.000×1.360——33.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA12.39%÷1.000×0.690——8.55%
HBP% /PA2.59%—×0.780——2.02%
Singles /BIP30.73%÷1.000×0.920×1.013—28.64%
Doubles /BIP6.83%÷1.000×0.830×1.013—5.74%
Triples /BIP1.46%÷1.000×0.910×1.013—1.35%
Home runs /BIP4.88%÷1.000×0.800——3.90%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.

Result: wOBA .390 → .313; ISO .172 → .134; BABIP .402 → .364. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 192 PAwOBA .315 → .258 (−56)K% 26.0% → 33.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA26.04%÷1.000×1.270——33.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA16.67%÷1.000×0.710—×1.01211.98%
HBP% /PA1.04%—×0.790—×1.0120.83%
Singles /BIP21.30%÷1.000×0.920×1.046×1.01220.74%
Doubles /BIP5.56%÷1.000×0.810×1.046×1.0124.76%
Triples /BIP1.85%÷1.000×0.850×1.046×1.0121.67%
Home runs /BIP2.78%÷1.000×0.800—×1.0122.25%

Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.

Result: wOBA .315 → .258; ISO .120 → .098; BABIP .295 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).