Alving Campusano

P DSL Royals Ventura

Age 20 RHP 6'2" / 150 lbs ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	18	ROKDSL Royals Fo…	11	2	24	3.80	5.21	16.2%	21.4%	—	K 11.0% · BB 26.7% · FIP 6.25
2026	19	ROKDSL Royals Ve…	7	5	18	2.04	3.04	19.4%	12.5%	—	K 13.2% · BB 15.6% · FIP 3.96
2027PROJ	20	MLBKC	11	0	12	5.65	5.65	19.6%	17.5%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	21	MLBKC	10	0	11	5.34	5.22	20.5%	15.0%	-0.1

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%

CompsKeegan Zinn (age 19) · Chris Viall (age 20) · Jaydenn Estanista (age 20)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 140132vR 124

ERA5.65

FIP5.65

K%19.6%

BB%17.5%

K-BB%2.0%

Proj IP12

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 12 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4550

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	18	ROK MLE	DSL Royals Fortuna	11	2	24	117	19	25	1	18%	2.2	11.0%	26.7%	-15.7%	1.3%	3.80	6.25	—
2025	18	ROK MLE	DSL Royals Fortuna	11	2	24	117	19	25	1	18%	2.2	11.0%	26.7%	-15.7%	1.3%	3.80	6.25	—
2025	18	ROK RAW	DSL Royals Fortuna	11	2	24	117	19	25	1	18%	2.2	16.2%	21.4%	-5.1%	0.9%	3.80	5.21	—
2026	19	ROK MLE	DSL Royals Ventura	7	5	18	72	14	9	0	71%	2.5	13.2%	15.6%	-2.4%	0.0%	2.04	3.96	—
2026	19	ROK MLE	DSL Royals Ventura	7	5	18	72	14	9	0	71%	2.5	13.2%	15.6%	-2.4%	0.0%	2.04	3.96	—
2026	19	ROK RAW	DSL Royals Ventura	7	5	18	72	14	9	0	71%	2.5	19.4%	12.5%	6.9%	0.0%	2.04	3.04	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	20	MLB	KC	11	0	12	51	10	9	1	0%	1.1	19.6%	17.5%	2.0%	2.9%	5.65	5.65	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	21	MLB MLE	KC	21	0	22	95	19	14	3	0%	1.1	20.5%	15.0%	5.5%	2.9%	5.34	5.22	-0.2
2028	21	MLB CTX	KC	10	0	11	46	10	7	1	0%	1.1	20.5%	15.0%	5.5%	2.9%	5.34	5.22	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		10	0	11	46	10	7	1	0%	1.1	20.5%	15.0%	5.5%	2.9%	5.34	4.84	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	182	127	18	0%	1.1	20.5%	15.0%	5.5%	2.9%	5.34	4.84	-0.7
Career	—	MLE		18	7	41	189	22	42	1	39%	2.3	11.9%	22.5%	-10.6%	0.8%	3.05	5.38	-0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		87	34	200	915	109	206	7	39%	2.3	11.9%	22.5%	-10.6%	0.8%	3.05	5.38	-1.5

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Alving Campusano (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.65	19.6%	17.5%	2.9%	—	5.22	20.5%	5.5%	22	-0.43	—	—	—
Keegan Zinn R 2024 · 6.40 FIP	19	SP-	6.40	19.1%	19.5%	4.4%	.318	5.80	19.0%	-1.9%	112	-0.60	4.88	145	84
Chris Viall R 2016 · 5.86 FIP	20	SP-	5.86	18.9%	21.9%	2.9%	.314	5.06	21.3%	5.8%	88	-0.80	4.89	108	83
Jaydenn Estanista R 2022 · 5.61 FIP	20	SW	5.61	20.2%	16.9%	3.8%	.172	5.14	20.6%	2.4%	123	-0.47	4.59	230	83
Reynardo Cruz R 2022 · 5.44 FIP	20	SW	5.44	16.1%	18.2%	2.5%	.252	4.85	16.3%	-1.2%	66	-0.59	3.96	216	83
Radhames Liz R 2007 · 5.07 FIP	23	SW	5.07	19.7%	18.0%	2.5%	.301	5.66	14.5%	2.3%	84	+0.59	2.81	219	82
Wilian Bormie R 2023 · 5.84 FIP	22	SP-	5.84	21.6%	20.4%	3.6%	.275	4.13	23.2%	9.3%	203	-1.71	3.51	226	82
Luis Rujano R 2023 · 4.68 FIP	20	SW	4.68	17.1%	16.6%	1.7%	.309	4.71	17.6%	1.2%	150	+0.03	4.54	203	81
Jace Beck R 2021 · 5.13 FIP	21	SP-	5.13	21.1%	23.7%	1.5%	.347	5.32	25.7%	2.8%	50	+0.19	4.03	216	81
Jhoster Baez R 2024 · 4.57 FIP	19	SP-	4.57	17.3%	14.8%	1.9%	.283	5.93	15.9%	-5.0%	73	+1.36	4.57	110	81
Trayson Kubo R 2019 · 5.01 FIP	21	SW	5.01	19.8%	15.6%	2.9%	.450	4.82	17.7%	1.4%	66	-0.19	4.48	107	81
Denny Larrondo R 2021 · 4.77 FIP	19	SW	4.77	22.7%	17.5%	2.5%	.293	5.26	18.1%	-0.4%	155	+0.49	4.48	293	81
Michael Martinez R 2019 · 4.50 FIP	20	SW	4.50	15.7%	16.5%	1.2%	.303	5.67	20.7%	7.0%	18	+1.17	3.69	146	80
Will Kobos R 2018 · 5.58 FIP	20	SW	5.58	19.3%	16.0%	3.8%	.313	3.46	26.6%	11.6%	76	-2.12	2.44	139	80
Tanner Cooper R 2021 · 4.71 FIP	21	SW	4.71	17.1%	14.1%	2.3%	.338	5.15	14.4%	6.7%	121	+0.44	4.51	148	79
Lisander Brito R 2022 · 5.62 FIP	20	SP-	5.62	14.1%	15.0%	3.3%	.309	3.23	18.9%	5.3%	21	-2.39	3.23	101	79
Over Galue R 2021 · 5.01 FIP	20	SW	5.01	17.5%	17.0%	2.2%	.346	4.16	18.2%	3.6%	94	-0.85	4.16	122	79
Alfred Vega R 2021 · 4.56 FIP	20	SP-	4.56	20.5%	16.0%	2.1%	.203	4.66	13.4%	0.6%	81	+0.10	2.07	234	79
Junior Mieses R 2019 · 4.87 FIP	19	SP-	4.87	19.9%	19.2%	1.9%	.296	6.10	18.9%	-1.2%	134	+1.23	4.87	236	78
Aneuris Rodriguez R 2024 · 5.22 FIP	20	SW	5.22	16.0%	18.8%	2.0%	.310	6.65	14.6%	-15.5%	14	+1.43	3.15	118	78
Jesús Palacios R 2024 · 5.24 FIP	19	SP-	5.24	19.7%	20.5%	2.2%	.279	4.92	20.4%	-0.6%	36	-0.32	2.43	128	78