Landyn Vidourek
OF Fresno Grizzlies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21 | ALAA | 74 | .313/.378/.463 | 1 | 3 | 60 | — | .232/.284/.348 |
| 2026 | 22 | ACOL | 409 | .158/.319/.294 | 9 | 16 | 19 | — | .102/.221/.184 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBCOL | 487 | .184/.283/.296 | 9 | 10 | 67 | -0.3 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 24 | MLBCOL | 100 | .202/.298/.344 | 3 | 2 | 73 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBCOL | 166 | .208/.302/.361 | 5 | 4 | 78 | -0.1 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 67 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 313 | 378 | 463 | 841 | 149 | 488 | 34 | 9 | 374 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A | Fresno Grizzlies | — | 409 | 330 | 52 | 14 | 2 | 9 | 76 | 150 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 158 | 319 | 294 | 613 | 136 | 251 | 37 | 19 | 291 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 69 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 232 | 284 | 348 | 632 | 116 | 426 | 46 | 7 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | — | 409 | 354 | 36 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 204 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 102 | 221 | 184 | 404 | 82 | 209 | 50 | 13 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 69 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 232 | 284 | 348 | 632 | 116 | 441 | 46 | 7 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 67 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 313 | 378 | 463 | 841 | 149 | 488 | 34 | 9 | 374 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | — | 409 | 354 | 36 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 204 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 102 | 221 | 184 | 404 | 82 | 208 | 50 | 13 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | — | 409 | 330 | 52 | 14 | 2 | 9 | 76 | 150 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 158 | 319 | 294 | 613 | 136 | 251 | 37 | 19 | 291 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 69 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 232 | 284 | 348 | 632 | 116 | 426 | 46 | 7 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | — | 409 | 352 | 36 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 204 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 102 | 221 | 185 | 405 | 82 | 209 | 50 | 13 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 74 | 69 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 232 | 284 | 348 | 632 | 116 | 426 | 46 | 7 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | — | 409 | 352 | 36 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 204 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 102 | 221 | 185 | 405 | 82 | 209 | 50 | 13 | 196 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | COL | 0% | 487 | 426 | 78 | 16 | 2 | 9 | 55 | 170 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 184 | 283 | 296 | 578 | 112 | 277 | 35 | 11 | 266 | 67 | -19 | +1 | +0 | -3 | +11 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | COL | 30% | 333 | 291 | 57 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 37 | 114 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 191 | 288 | 317 | 605 | 126 | 279 | 34 | 11 | 277 | 73 | -11 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +7 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | COL | 44% | 377 | 329 | 65 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 42 | 127 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 196 | 292 | 333 | 625 | 136 | 281 | 34 | 11 | 284 | 78 | -10 | +1 | +1 | -2 | +8 | -0.3 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | COL | 51% | 403 | 353 | 70 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 44 | 133 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 200 | 295 | 344 | 639 | 144 | 281 | 33 | 11 | 289 | 82 | -9 | +1 | +1 | -2 | +9 | -0.1 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | COL | 52% | 413 | 362 | 73 | 14 | 2 | 11 | 45 | 135 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 202 | 295 | 345 | 640 | 143 | 281 | 33 | 11 | 290 | 82 | -9 | +1 | +1 | -2 | +9 | -0.1 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | COL | 53% | 414 | 363 | 73 | 14 | 2 | 11 | 45 | 134 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 202 | 295 | 343 | 638 | 141 | 281 | 32 | 11 | 289 | 81 | -9 | +1 | -0 | -2 | +9 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | COL | 30% | 100 | 88 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 202 | 298 | 344 | 642 | 142 | 294 | 34 | 11 | 291 | 73 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | COL | 44% | 166 | 146 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 56 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 208 | 302 | 361 | 664 | 154 | 296 | 34 | 11 | 299 | 78 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.1 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | COL | 51% | 204 | 178 | 37 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 67 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 212 | 306 | 374 | 680 | 162 | 296 | 33 | 11 | 305 | 82 | -4 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.0 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | COL | 52% | 216 | 188 | 41 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 70 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 213 | 306 | 374 | 680 | 161 | 296 | 32 | 11 | 305 | 82 | -5 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | COL | 53% | 221 | 193 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 24 | 71 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 214 | 305 | 372 | 677 | 159 | 295 | 32 | 11 | 304 | 81 | -5 | +0 | -0 | -1 | +5 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 907 | 793 | 169 | 32 | 5 | 28 | 100 | 298 | 7 | 21 | 7 | 213 | 307 | 372 | 679 | 159 | 299 | 33 | 11 | 302 | 69 | -21 | +1 | +1 | -5 | +20 | -0.5 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 568 | 122 | 23 | 4 | 20 | 72 | 214 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 215 | 309 | 375 | 684 | 160 | 303 | 33 | 11 | 302 | 69 | -15 | +1 | +1 | -4 | +14 | -0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2633 | 2304 | 424 | 83 | 13 | 62 | 294 | 954 | 17 | 68 | 22 | 184 | 281 | 312 | 593 | 128 | 279 | 36 | 11 | 270 | 69 | -55 | +4 | +2 | -13 | +47 | -1.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 569 | 104 | 20 | 3 | 15 | 73 | 236 | 4 | 17 | 5 | 183 | 281 | 308 | 588 | 125 | 277 | 36 | 11 | 270 | 69 | -17 | +1 | +1 | -4 | +14 | -0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AFresno Grizzlies · 409 PAwOBA .284 → .196 (−88)K% 36.7% → 49.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 36.67% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 49.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 12.69% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.49% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.38% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.953 | ×0.990 | 13.02% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.78% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.953 | ×0.990 | 6.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.953 | ×0.990 | 0.95% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 3.96% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.953.
Result: wOBA .284 → .196; ISO .136 → .091; BABIP .251 → .209. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 74 PAwOBA .364 → .257 (−107)K% 33.8% → 46.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.78% | ÷0.987 | ×1.360 | — | — | 46.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.46% | ÷0.981 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.65% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 33.33% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | — | — | 30.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.90% | ÷1.054 | ×0.830 | — | — | 9.37% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.38% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | — | — | 1.88% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.38% | ÷1.055 | ×0.800 | — | — | 1.80% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 111, 1B 101, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 97, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .364 → .257; ISO .149 → .096; BABIP .488 → .426. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).