Daniel Rojas
SS FCL Cardinals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | ROKSTL | 154 | .248/.292/.338 | 1 | 5 | 1 | — | .149/.182/.182 |
| 2025 | 19 | ROKSTL | 139 | .214/.275/.270 | 2 | 14 | 0 | — | .145/.188/.176 |
| 2026 | 20 | A/ROKSTL | 123 | .197/.236/.291 | 2 | 9 | -8 | — | .126/.154/.176 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBSTL | 233 | .196/.243/.276 | 2 | 5 | 45 | -0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBSTL | 46 | .202/.250/.289 | 1 | 1 | 51 | -0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 32 / POW 40
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 137 | 33 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 34 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 241 | 320 | 321 | 641 | 80 | 317 | 22 | 7 | 294 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 145 | 36 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 33 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 248 | 292 | 338 | 630 | 90 | 315 | 21 | 5 | 284 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | FCL Cardinals | — | 139 | 126 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 34 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 214 | 275 | 270 | 545 | 56 | 275 | 24 | 7 | 251 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 21 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 238 | 238 | 286 | 524 | 48 | 357 | 33 | 0 | 234 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK | FCL Cardinals | — | 102 | 96 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 188 | 235 | 292 | 527 | 104 | 222 | 22 | 6 | 239 | -10 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 140 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 43 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 136 | 209 | 179 | 388 | 43 | 186 | 28 | 5 | 173 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 148 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 41 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 149 | 182 | 182 | 364 | 34 | 207 | 27 | 3 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Cardinals | — | 139 | 131 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 145 | 188 | 176 | 364 | 31 | 217 | 35 | 4 | 168 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 21 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 190 | 190 | 238 | 429 | 48 | 327 | 48 | 0 | 169 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Cardinals | — | 102 | 98 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 112 | 147 | 163 | 310 | 51 | 164 | 31 | 4 | 153 | -10 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 140 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 43 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 136 | 209 | 179 | 388 | 43 | 194 | 28 | 5 | 173 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 137 | 33 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 34 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 241 | 320 | 321 | 641 | 80 | 317 | 22 | 7 | 294 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 148 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 41 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 149 | 182 | 182 | 364 | 34 | 206 | 27 | 3 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 145 | 36 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 33 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 248 | 292 | 338 | 630 | 90 | 315 | 21 | 5 | 284 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Cardinals | — | 139 | 131 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 145 | 188 | 176 | 364 | 31 | 220 | 35 | 4 | 168 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Cardinals | — | 139 | 126 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 34 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 214 | 275 | 270 | 545 | 56 | 275 | 24 | 7 | 251 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 123 | 119 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 126 | 154 | 176 | 331 | 50 | 182 | 33 | 3 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 123 | 117 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 29 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 197 | 236 | 291 | 526 | 94 | 244 | 24 | 5 | 238 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 140 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 43 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 136 | 209 | 179 | 388 | 43 | 186 | 28 | 5 | 173 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 147 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 41 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 150 | 182 | 184 | 365 | 34 | 207 | 27 | 3 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Cardinals | — | 139 | 131 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 145 | 188 | 176 | 364 | 31 | 217 | 35 | 4 | 168 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 123 | 118 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 127 | 154 | 178 | 332 | 51 | 192 | 33 | 3 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals | — | 154 | 147 | 22 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 41 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 150 | 182 | 184 | 365 | 34 | 207 | 27 | 3 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Cardinals | — | 139 | 131 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 145 | 188 | 176 | 364 | 31 | 217 | 35 | 4 | 168 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 123 | 118 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 127 | 154 | 178 | 332 | 51 | 192 | 33 | 3 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | STL | 0% | 233 | 217 | 43 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 65 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 196 | 243 | 276 | 519 | 80 | 265 | 28 | 5 | 235 | 45 | -15 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +5 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | STL | 34% | 133 | 124 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 37 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 201 | 250 | 290 | 540 | 89 | 268 | 28 | 5 | 244 | 51 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | STL | 34% | 46 | 44 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 202 | 250 | 289 | 540 | 88 | 269 | 28 | 4 | 244 | 51 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 46 | 44 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 182 | 217 | 273 | 490 | 91 | 233 | 28 | 4 | 244 | 13 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 622 | 113 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 28 | 184 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 182 | 217 | 272 | 489 | 90 | 233 | 28 | 4 | 244 | 13 | -38 | +3 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 777 | 731 | 113 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 34 | 232 | 9 | 39 | 14 | 155 | 202 | 207 | 408 | 52 | 217 | 30 | 4 | 187 | 13 | -13 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +4 | -0.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 612 | 94 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 28 | 194 | 8 | 33 | 12 | 154 | 201 | 204 | 405 | 51 | 216 | 30 | 4 | 187 | 13 | -39 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Cardinals · 102 PAwOBA .232 → .153 (−79)K% 21.6% → 31.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.57% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 31.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 3.59% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.22% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.951 | ×0.985 | 12.46% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.41% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.951 | ×0.985 | 3.65% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.951 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 2.08% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.951.
Result: wOBA .232 → .153; ISO .104 → .069; BABIP .222 → .164. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 APalm Beach Cardinals · 21 PAwOBA .227 → .169 (−58)K% 33.3% → 45.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.33% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 45.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.015 | 26.68% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.015 | 6.02% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .227 → .169; ISO .048 → .033; BABIP .357 → .327. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Cardinals · 139 PAwOBA .246 → .168 (−78)K% 24.5% → 35.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.46% | ÷0.996 | ×1.440 | — | — | 35.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.19% | ÷1.011 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 4.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.72% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.09% | ÷1.030 | ×0.820 | ×1.010 | ×0.995 | 20.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.09% | ÷1.035 | ×0.720 | ×1.010 | ×0.995 | 0.76% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.010 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.17% | ÷1.149 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 1.47% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 130, 1B 106, 2B 107, 3B 100, K 99, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.010.
Result: wOBA .246 → .168; ISO .056 → .034; BABIP .275 → .217. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 DSLDSL Cardinals · 154 PAwOBA .276 → .170 (−106)K% 21.4% → 26.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.43% | ÷0.992 | ×1.220 | — | — | 26.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.19% | ÷1.033 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 3.50% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.65% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 0.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.89% | ÷0.997 | ×0.680 | ×1.002 | ×0.995 | 17.61% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.79% | ÷0.976 | ×0.600 | ×1.002 | ×0.995 | 1.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.57% | ÷1.132 | ×0.600 | ×1.002 | ×0.995 | 1.89% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.89% | ÷1.307 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 0.32% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 161, 1B 99, 2B 95, 3B 126, K 98, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.002.
Result: wOBA .276 → .170; ISO .090 → .043; BABIP .315 → .207. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 DSLDSL Cardinals · 154 PAwOBA .288 → .173 (−116)K% 22.1% → 27.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.08% | ÷0.965 | ×1.220 | — | — | 27.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.14% | ÷0.985 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 5.12% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.25% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 2.29% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.27% | ÷1.086 | ×0.680 | ×0.969 | ×1.008 | 14.83% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.85% | ÷1.206 | ×0.600 | ×0.969 | ×1.008 | 2.36% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.91% | ÷1.062 | ×0.600 | ×0.969 | ×1.008 | 1.61% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.932 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 117, 2B 141, 3B 112, K 93, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.969.
Result: wOBA .288 → .173; ISO .080 → .041; BABIP .317 → .186. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).