Juan Reyes
P FCL Nationals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | ROKWSH | 8 | 8 | 13 | 4.15 | 2.33 | 22.0% | 8.0% | — | K 15.0% · BB 10.0% · FIP 3.10 |
| 2025 | 20 | ROKWSH | 12 | 12 | 60 | 2.40 | 2.45 | 22.6% | 5.7% | — | K 15.4% · BB 7.1% · FIP 3.21 |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 17 | 14 | 65 | 3.06 | 2.65 | 28.8% | 8.8% | — | K 20.2% · BB 10.9% · FIP 3.92 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBWSH | — | — | 0 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 17.7% | 10.6% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 23 | MLBWSH | 5 | 5 | 26 | 4.76 | 4.71 | 19.0% | 10.1% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ70% MLB | 24 | MLBWSH | 7 | 7 | 37 | 4.65 | 4.59 | 19.9% | 9.8% | 0.3 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Nationals | 8 | 8 | 13 | 50 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 1.6 | 15.0% | 10.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 4.15 | 3.10 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Nationals | 8 | 8 | 13 | 50 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 1.6 | 15.0% | 10.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 4.15 | 3.10 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Nationals | 8 | 8 | 13 | 50 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 1.6 | 22.0% | 8.0% | 14.0% | 0.0% | 4.15 | 2.33 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Nationals | 12 | 12 | 60 | 230 | 52 | 13 | 2 | 100% | 5.0 | 15.4% | 7.1% | 8.3% | 0.9% | 2.40 | 3.21 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Nationals | 12 | 12 | 60 | 230 | 52 | 13 | 2 | 100% | 5.0 | 15.4% | 7.1% | 8.3% | 0.9% | 2.40 | 3.21 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Nationals | 12 | 12 | 60 | 230 | 52 | 13 | 2 | 100% | 5.0 | 22.6% | 5.7% | 17.0% | 0.9% | 2.40 | 2.45 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 14 | 65 | 260 | 75 | 23 | 4 | 82% | 3.8 | 20.2% | 10.9% | 9.2% | 2.1% | 3.06 | 3.92 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 17 | 14 | 65 | 260 | 75 | 23 | 4 | 82% | 3.8 | 20.2% | 10.9% | 9.2% | 2.1% | 3.06 | 3.92 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 17 | 14 | 65 | 260 | 75 | 23 | 4 | 82% | 3.8 | 28.8% | 8.8% | 20.0% | 1.5% | 3.06 | 2.65 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | WSH | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.7% | 10.6% | 7.1% | 2.9% | 4.90 | 4.90 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | WSH | 10 | 10 | 52 | 222 | 42 | 22 | 6 | 100% | 5.2 | 19.0% | 10.1% | 8.9% | 2.8% | 4.76 | 4.71 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | WSH | 9 | 9 | 52 | 222 | 44 | 22 | 6 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.9% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 2.8% | 4.65 | 4.59 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | WSH | 8 | 8 | 45 | 189 | 39 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 5.6 | 20.4% | 9.6% | 10.8% | 2.8% | 4.57 | 4.52 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | WSH | 7 | 7 | 45 | 189 | 39 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 6.4 | 20.7% | 9.6% | 11.1% | 2.8% | 4.52 | 4.49 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | WSH | 7 | 7 | 44 | 184 | 38 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.7% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 2.9% | 4.53 | 4.53 | +0.4 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | WSH | 5 | 5 | 26 | 110 | 21 | 11 | 3 | 100% | 5.2 | 19.0% | 10.1% | 8.9% | 2.8% | 4.76 | 4.71 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | WSH | 7 | 7 | 37 | 156 | 31 | 15 | 4 | 100% | 5.3 | 19.9% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 2.8% | 4.65 | 4.59 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | WSH | 6 | 6 | 36 | 152 | 31 | 15 | 4 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.4% | 9.6% | 10.8% | 2.8% | 4.57 | 4.52 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | WSH | 6 | 6 | 39 | 165 | 34 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.7% | 9.6% | 11.1% | 2.8% | 4.52 | 4.49 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | WSH | 6 | 6 | 39 | 165 | 34 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.7% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 2.9% | 4.53 | 4.53 | +0.4 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 31 | 31 | 177 | 748 | 151 | 73 | 21 | 100% | 5.7 | 20.2% | 9.7% | 10.5% | 2.8% | 4.59 | 4.18 | +2.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 35 | 35 | 200 | 844 | 171 | 82 | 24 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.2% | 9.7% | 10.5% | 2.8% | 4.59 | 4.18 | +2.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 37 | 34 | 138 | 540 | 95 | 50 | 8 | 92% | 3.7 | 17.7% | 9.2% | 8.4% | 1.4% | 2.88 | 3.54 | +2.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 54 | 49 | 200 | 785 | 139 | 72 | 11 | 92% | 3.7 | 17.7% | 9.2% | 8.4% | 1.4% | 2.88 | 3.54 | +1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Nationals · 41 IPFIP 2.68 → 4.09 (+1.42)K% 29.6% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.59% | — | ×0.680 | 20.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.24% | — | ×1.250 | 14.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.18% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 1.66% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.68 → 4.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AFredericksburg Nationals · 24 IPFIP 2.54 → 3.61 (+1.07)K% 27.5% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.47% | — | ×0.740 | 20.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.40% | — | ×1.180 | 5.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.20% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.86% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.54 → 3.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKDSL Nationals · 60 IPFIP 2.38 → 3.21 (+0.83)K% 22.6% → 15.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.61% | — | ×0.680 | 15.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.65% | — | ×1.250 | 7.07% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.87% | ÷1.300 | ×1.400 | 0.94% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 160).
Result: FIP 2.38 → 3.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKDSL Nationals · 13 IPFIP 2.26 → 3.10 (+0.85)K% 22.0% → 15.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.00% | — | ×0.680 | 14.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.00% | — | ×1.250 | 10.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.207 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 141).
Result: FIP 2.26 → 3.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.5 | 48 | 19.6% | 9.9% | 1.10 | 4.66 |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |
| Cliff Politte ('06) | 2.1 | 51 | 19.3% | 9.6% | 1.23 | 4.40 |
| Jacob Barnes ('25) | 1.7 | 48 | 22.0% | 9.2% | 1.15 | 4.79 |
| Bill Pleis ('61-'66, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 56 | 19.7%* | 9.8%* | 1.15* | 4.53* |
| Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 59 | 18.3%* | 9.8%* | 1.20* | 4.32* |