Roberto Medina
P FCL Rays| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20 | ROKTB | 17 | 0 | 25 | 2.92 | 2.86 | 22.0% | 12.8% | — | K 15.0% · BB 16.1% · FIP 3.87 |
| 2026 | 21 | ROKTB | 16 | 0 | 20 | 6.30 | 6.50 | 22.3% | 16.0% | — | K 15.2% · BB 19.9% · FIP 8.43 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBTB | — | — | 0 | 5.55 | 5.55 | 20.2% | 16.6% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 23 | MLBTB | 9 | 0 | 9 | 5.25 | 5.13 | 21.3% | 14.2% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | 11 | 11 | 37 | 167 | 53 | 29 | 2 | 100% | 3.3 | 21.6% | 21.7% | -0.1% | 1.5% | 3.68 | 4.85 | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Tampa Bay | 11 | 11 | 37 | 167 | 53 | 29 | 2 | 100% | 3.3 | 31.7% | 17.4% | 14.4% | 1.2% | 3.68 | 3.29 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 11 | 2 | 28 | 121 | 33 | 19 | 2 | 18% | 2.5 | 18.5% | 19.6% | -1.1% | 2.3% | 4.18 | 5.29 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 11 | 2 | 28 | 121 | 33 | 19 | 2 | 18% | 2.5 | 18.5% | 19.6% | -1.1% | 2.3% | 4.18 | 5.29 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | 11 | 2 | 28 | 121 | 33 | 19 | 2 | 18% | 2.5 | 27.3% | 15.7% | 11.6% | 1.7% | 4.18 | 3.71 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 17 | 0 | 25 | 109 | 24 | 14 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 15.0% | 16.1% | -1.1% | 0.0% | 2.92 | 3.87 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 17 | 0 | 25 | 109 | 24 | 14 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 15.0% | 16.1% | -1.1% | 0.0% | 2.92 | 3.87 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | 17 | 0 | 25 | 109 | 24 | 14 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 22.0% | 12.8% | 9.2% | 0.0% | 2.92 | 2.86 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 16 | 0 | 20 | 94 | 21 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.2 | 15.2% | 19.9% | -4.8% | 7.4% | 6.30 | 8.43 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 16 | 0 | 20 | 94 | 21 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.2 | 15.2% | 19.9% | -4.8% | 7.4% | 6.30 | 8.43 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | 16 | 0 | 20 | 94 | 21 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.3% | 16.0% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 6.30 | 6.50 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | TB | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | 16.6% | 3.7% | 3.1% | 5.55 | 5.55 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | TB | 16 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 16 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.3% | 14.2% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.25 | 5.13 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | TB | 9 | 0 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.3% | 14.2% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.25 | 5.13 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 8 | 0 | 9 | 36 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.3% | 14.2% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.25 | 4.75 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 188 | 118 | 24 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.3% | 14.2% | 7.2% | 3.0% | 5.25 | 4.75 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 55 | 13 | 109 | 491 | 89 | 96 | 12 | 24% | 2.0 | 18.1% | 19.6% | -1.5% | 2.5% | 4.12 | 5.43 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 101 | 24 | 200 | 898 | 163 | 176 | 22 | 24% | 2.0 | 18.1% | 19.6% | -1.5% | 2.5% | 4.12 | 5.43 | -1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Rays · 20 IPFIP 6.15 → 8.43 (+2.28)K% 22.3% → 15.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.34% | — | ×0.680 | 15.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.96% | — | ×1.250 | 19.95% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.32% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 7.45% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 6.15 → 8.43, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Rays · 25 IPFIP 2.87 → 3.87 (+1.00)K% 22.0% → 15.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.02% | — | ×0.680 | 14.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.84% | — | ×1.250 | 16.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.809 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 62).
Result: FIP 2.87 → 3.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Rays · 28 IPFIP 3.69 → 5.29 (+1.59)K% 27.3% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.680 | 18.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.70% | — | ×1.250 | 19.63% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.65% | ÷1.002 | ×1.400 | 2.31% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.69 → 5.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Tampa Bay · 37 IPFIP 3.28 → 4.85 (+1.57)K% 31.7% → 21.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.74% | — | ×0.680 | 21.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.37% | — | ×1.250 | 21.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.20% | ÷1.121 | ×1.400 | 1.50% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 124).
Result: FIP 3.28 → 4.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).