Enmanuel Talavera

P DSL Reds

Age 21 RHP 6'2" / 170 lbs ROK peak 0.3 · 2028

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2024	18	ROKDSL Rojos	13	10	47	2.47	2.64	24.3%	5.0%	—	K 16.5% · BB 6.2% · FIP 3.77
2025	19	ROKCIN	6	6	24	3.00	3.14	27.1%	9.4%	—	K 18.4% · BB 11.7% · FIP 4.64
2027PROJ	21	MLBCIN	4	4	18	4.46	4.46	22.0%	9.4%	0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	22	MLBCIN	2	2	11	4.34	4.26	23.1%	8.9%	0.1

Next 2 projected WAR 0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsFlorencio Serrano (age 21) · Carson Rudd (age 22) · Hunter Gregory (age 23)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 118110vR 102

ERA4.46

FIP4.46

K%22.0%

BB%9.4%

K-BB%12.6%

Proj IP18

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 18 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2023	17	ROK MLE	DSL Reds	14	3	23	97	25	13	2	21%	1.7	17.5%	16.8%	0.8%	3.1%	3.09	5.47	—
2023	17	ROK RAW	DSL Reds	14	3	23	97	25	13	2	21%	1.7	25.8%	13.4%	12.4%	2.1%	3.09	3.74	—
2024	18	ROK MLE	DSL Rojos	13	10	47	181	44	9	3	77%	3.6	16.5%	6.2%	10.3%	2.3%	2.47	3.77	—
2024	18	ROK MLE	DSL Rojos	13	10	47	181	44	9	3	77%	3.6	16.5%	6.2%	10.3%	2.3%	2.47	3.77	—
2024	18	ROK RAW	DSL Rojos	13	10	47	181	44	9	3	77%	3.6	24.3%	5.0%	19.3%	1.7%	2.47	2.64	—
2025	19	ROK MLE	DSL Reds	6	6	24	96	26	9	2	100%	4.0	18.4%	11.7%	6.7%	2.9%	3.00	4.64	—
2025	19	ROK MLE	DSL Reds	6	6	24	96	26	9	2	100%	4.0	18.4%	11.7%	6.7%	2.9%	3.00	4.64	—
2025	19	ROK RAW	DSL Reds	6	6	24	96	26	9	2	100%	4.0	27.1%	9.4%	17.7%	2.1%	3.00	3.14	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	21	MLB	CIN	4	4	18	76	17	7	2	100%	4.5	22.0%	9.4%	12.6%	3.0%	4.46	4.46	+0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	22	MLB MLE	CIN	4	4	23	96	22	8	3	100%	5.7	23.1%	8.9%	14.2%	2.9%	4.34	4.26	+0.2
2028	22	MLB CTX	CIN	2	2	11	46	11	4	1	100%	5.5	23.1%	8.9%	14.2%	2.9%	4.34	4.26	+0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		2	2	11	47	11	4	1	100%	5.6	23.1%	8.9%	14.2%	2.9%	4.34	3.88	+0.1
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		39	39	200	844	197	72	18	100%	5.1	23.1%	8.9%	14.2%	2.9%	4.34	3.88	+2.4
Career	—	MLE		33	19	95	374	65	39	10	58%	2.9	17.3%	10.4%	6.9%	2.7%	2.76	4.43	+0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		70	40	200	790	136	82	21	58%	2.9	17.3%	10.4%	6.9%	2.7%	2.76	4.43	+1.5

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Enmanuel Talavera (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.46	22.0%	9.4%	3.0%	—	4.26	23.1%	14.2%	23	-0.20	—	—	—
Florencio Serrano R 2021 · 3.84 FIP	21	SP-	3.84	19.3%	8.5%	2.4%	.264	4.80	14.1%	3.4%	117	+0.96	3.84	206	86
Carson Rudd R 2021 · 3.39 FIP	22	SP-	3.39	25.4%	10.6%	2.0%	.351	5.24	21.6%	5.6%	193	+1.85	3.39	242	84
Hunter Gregory R 2022 · 3.90 FIP	23	SP-	3.90	21.2%	8.7%	2.7%	.374	4.56	20.4%	7.9%	188	+0.66	3.84	249	82
Connor Cooke R 2022 · 3.35 FIP	22	SP-	3.35	23.7%	8.4%	2.2%	.350	4.10	24.4%	11.8%	56	+0.75	2.93	103	82
Casey Legumina R 2021 · 4.08 FIP	24	SP-	4.08	23.3%	9.3%	3.2%	.260	4.33	20.2%	11.3%	189	+0.25	3.54	355	82
Colin Fields R 2023 · 3.62 FIP	23	SP-	3.62	20.5%	10.3%	1.7%	.246	3.86	22.0%	13.3%	208	+0.24	2.87	254	81
Wilmer Ortega R 2022 · 4.01 FIP	21	SP-	4.01	18.2%	7.9%	2.6%	.304	5.81	16.1%	1.8%	30	+1.80	3.62	158	81
Jeronimo Castro R 2018 · 3.45 FIP	21	SP-	3.45	25.2%	8.2%	2.6%	.362	3.85	20.1%	7.9%	35	+0.40	3.19	158	81
Eiberson Castellano R 2022 · 3.94 FIP	21	SW	3.94	21.8%	10.3%	2.5%	.266	3.93	22.0%	12.3%	189	-0.01	3.67	386	80
Jonathan Petit R 2022 · 4.64 FIP	21	SP-	4.64	16.3%	9.1%	3.2%	.272	5.11	15.6%	2.4%	113	+0.47	2.70	189	79
Simon Mathews R 2017 · 4.09 FIP	21	SW	4.09	17.7%	7.5%	2.8%	.326	4.42	16.0%	5.9%	167	+0.33	4.09	215	79
Kobe Robinson R 2022 · 4.49 FIP	21	SW	4.49	23.2%	14.3%	2.8%	.296	3.44	18.8%	4.9%	84	-1.05	2.98	107	78
Ryan Fernandez R 2018 · 4.44 FIP	20	SP-	4.44	19.2%	6.8%	3.8%	.357	3.37	20.8%	13.2%	53	-1.07	3.02	363	78
Rico Garcia R 2017 · 3.37 FIP	23	SP-	3.37	18.8%	7.0%	1.8%	.316	4.07	19.8%	11.5%	296	+0.70	3.37	592	78
Chad Donato R 2017 · 3.85 FIP	22	SP-	3.85	20.9%	11.4%	2.0%	.333	3.99	21.4%	12.6%	184	+0.14	2.89	439	78
Cole Stapler R 2017 · 3.83 FIP	22	SW	3.83	19.2%	6.0%	2.9%	.266	3.31	18.1%	13.2%	220	-0.52	3.26	255	77
Ray Gaither R 2022 · 4.85 FIP	24	SP-	4.85	21.9%	13.2%	3.5%	.314	4.34	18.3%	5.8%	123	-0.51	3.84	164	77
Miguelangel Boadas R 2024 · 3.55 FIP	21	SP-	3.55	20.6%	11.0%	1.4%	.319	—	—	—	—	—	2.64	129	77
Dawil Almonte R 2022 · 3.59 FIP	20	SW	3.59	17.4%	7.8%	1.8%	.271	4.54	14.7%	3.3%	97	+0.95	3.59	138	77
Chris Campos R 2023 · 4.91 FIP	22	SP-	4.91	21.0%	11.8%	3.8%	.364	4.57	18.6%	11.6%	249	-0.34	4.54	318	77