Zebby Matthews
P Minnesota Twins| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX4 levels | 27 | 26 | 135 | 3.74 | 2.91 | 28.5% | 3.3% | 4.2 | K 24.6% · BB 3.4% · FIP 3.35 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 24 | 24 | 116 | 4.34 | 3.08 | 26.9% | 6.6% | 3.3 | K 25.6% · BB 6.4% · FIP 3.15 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 30 | 30 | 165 | 4.86 | 4.81 | 21.4% | 7.2% | 1.1 | K 20.7% · BB 7.0% · FIP 4.90 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBMIN | 16 | 16 | 98 | 4.70 | 4.60 | 22.7% | 6.6% | 0.9 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 28 | MLBMIN | 14 | 14 | 86 | 4.70 | 4.69 | 22.6% | 6.7% | 0.7 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 29 | MLBMIN | 13 | 13 | 76 | 4.79 | 4.85 | 22.0% | 6.9% | 0.5 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 60.0% | 0.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -1.97 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 60.0% | 0.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -0.90 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 20 | 105 | 424 | 112 | 15 | 14 | 91% | 4.8 | 20.0% | 4.1% | 15.9% | 3.7% | 3.84 | 3.96 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 20 | 105 | 424 | 112 | 15 | 14 | 91% | 4.8 | 26.4% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 3.3% | 3.84 | 3.13 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 27 | 26 | 135 | 551 | 157 | 18 | 18 | 96% | 5.0 | 24.6% | 3.4% | 21.2% | 3.5% | 3.74 | 3.35 | +3.4 |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 27 | 26 | 135 | 551 | 157 | 18 | 18 | 96% | 5.0 | 24.6% | 3.4% | 21.2% | 3.5% | 3.74 | 3.35 | +3.4 |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 27 | 26 | 135 | 551 | 157 | 18 | 18 | 96% | 5.0 | 28.5% | 3.3% | 25.2% | 3.3% | 3.74 | 2.91 | +4.2 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 116 | 502 | 135 | 33 | 13 | 100% | 4.8 | 25.6% | 6.4% | 19.2% | 2.6% | 4.34 | 3.15 | +3.2 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 116 | 502 | 135 | 33 | 13 | 100% | 4.8 | 25.6% | 6.4% | 19.2% | 2.6% | 4.34 | 3.15 | +3.2 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 116 | 502 | 135 | 33 | 13 | 100% | 4.8 | 26.9% | 6.6% | 20.3% | 2.6% | 4.34 | 3.08 | +3.3 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 30 | 165 | 696 | 149 | 50 | 33 | 100% | 5.5 | 20.7% | 7.0% | 13.7% | 4.9% | 4.86 | 4.90 | +0.9 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 30 | 165 | 696 | 149 | 50 | 33 | 100% | 5.5 | 20.7% | 7.0% | 13.7% | 4.9% | 4.86 | 4.90 | +0.9 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 30 | 30 | 165 | 696 | 149 | 50 | 33 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.4% | 7.2% | 14.2% | 4.7% | 4.86 | 4.81 | +1.1 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 48 | 48 | 247 | 1076 | 247 | 74 | 47 | 100% | 5.2 | 23.0% | 6.9% | 16.1% | 4.4% | 5.39 | 4.47 | +2.7 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | MIN | 16 | 16 | 98 | 414 | 94 | 27 | 17 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.7% | 6.6% | 16.2% | 4.0% | 4.70 | 4.60 | +0.9 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIN | 15 | 15 | 90 | 382 | 86 | 26 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.6% | 6.7% | 15.9% | 4.1% | 4.69 | 4.68 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIN | 13 | 13 | 80 | 336 | 74 | 23 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.0% | 6.9% | 15.1% | 4.3% | 4.78 | 4.84 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIN | 11 | 11 | 68 | 288 | 61 | 21 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.3% | 7.2% | 14.1% | 4.5% | 4.94 | 5.05 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIN | 14 | 14 | 86 | 363 | 82 | 24 | 15 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.6% | 6.7% | 15.9% | 4.1% | 4.70 | 4.69 | +0.7 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIN | 13 | 13 | 76 | 321 | 71 | 22 | 14 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.0% | 6.9% | 15.1% | 4.3% | 4.79 | 4.85 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIN | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 59 | 20 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.3% | 7.2% | 14.1% | 4.5% | 4.95 | 5.06 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 86 | 86 | 474 | 2031 | 458 | 140 | 88 | 100% | 5.5 | 22.5% | 6.9% | 15.6% | 4.3% | 5.11 | 4.45 | +5.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 36 | 36 | 200 | 858 | 193 | 59 | 37 | 100% | 5.5 | 22.5% | 6.9% | 15.6% | 4.3% | 5.11 | 4.45 | +2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 105 | 100 | 524 | 2183 | 499 | 117 | 81 | 95% | 5.0 | 22.9% | 5.4% | 17.5% | 3.7% | 4.23 | 3.89 | +4.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 40 | 38 | 200 | 834 | 191 | 45 | 31 | 95% | 5.0 | 22.9% | 5.4% | 17.5% | 3.7% | 4.23 | 3.89 | +1.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAASt. Paul Saints · 34 IPFIP 5.45 → 5.94 (+0.49)K% 21.9% → 18.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.85% | — | ×0.860 | 18.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.28% | — | ×0.900 | 6.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.96% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 6.56% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.45 → 5.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAASt. Paul Saints · 37 IPFIP 1.56 → 1.81 (+0.25)K% 31.8% → 27.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.76% | — | ×0.860 | 27.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.08% | — | ×0.900 | 5.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.68% | ÷1.253 | ×1.100 | 0.59% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 151).
Result: FIP 1.56 → 1.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAWichita Wind Surge · 55 IPFIP 1.44 → 2.18 (+0.74)K% 30.1% → 24.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.14% | — | ×0.810 | 24.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.87% | — | ×1.100 | 3.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.96% | ÷0.845 | ×1.200 | 1.36% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 1.44 → 2.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 23 IPFIP 0.94 → 1.62 (+0.68)K% 33.3% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.770 | 25.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.150 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.19% | ÷1.191 | ×1.250 | 1.25% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 138).
Result: FIP 0.94 → 1.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAASt. Paul Saints · 19 IPFIP 3.57 → 4.05 (+0.48)K% 28.4% → 24.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.40% | — | ×0.860 | 24.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 1.23% | — | ×0.900 | 1.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.94% | ÷1.039 | ×1.100 | 5.23% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 3.57 → 4.05, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 67 IPFIP 4.35 → 5.10 (+0.76)K% 21.5% → 16.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.53% | — | ×0.770 | 16.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.65% | — | ×1.150 | 4.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.74% | ÷1.134 | ×1.250 | 5.23% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 4.35 → 5.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 39 IPFIP 0.90 → 1.88 (+0.97)K% 35.3% → 26.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.33% | — | ×0.740 | 26.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.33% | — | ×1.180 | 3.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.67% | ÷0.976 | ×1.300 | 0.89% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 0.90 → 1.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.9 | 83 | 22.5% | 6.8% | 1.65 | 5.03 |
| Adam Morgan ('21) | 1.8 | 62 | 20.8% | 7.2% | 1.58 | 4.80 |
| Sam Gaviglio ('20) | 1.5 | 99 | 19.1% | 7.2% | 1.67 | 4.88 |
| Matt Wisler ('22) | 2.5 | 63 | 20.1% | 7.6% | 1.40 | 4.59 |
| John Boozer ('62-'69, -2 WAR*) | 2.0 | 66 | 21.1%* | 9.0%* | 1.46* | 5.15* |
| Pat Underwood ('79-'83, 1 WAR*) | 1.7 | 115 | 20.9%* | 6.3%* | 1.57* | 4.52* |
| Bob Heffner ('63-'68, 0 WAR*) | 1.8 | 118 | 20.0%* | 7.2%* | 1.37* | 5.07* |