Jimmy Nelson
P Oklahoma City Dodgers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 30 | MIX3 levels | 27 | 7 | 63 | 5.54 | 3.98 | 29.2% | 13.9% | 0.4 | K 26.9% · BB 14.6% · FIP 4.28 | |
| 2021 | 32 | MLBLAD | 28 | 1 | 29 | 1.86 | 1.41 | 37.9% | 11.2% | 1.1 | ||
| 2023 | 34 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 2 | 31 | 4.40 | 4.63 | 26.2% | 22.1% | — | K 22.2% · BB 21.1% · FIP 4.82 | |
| 2024 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 24 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 4 | 1 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 25% | 2.5 | 21.6% | 13.5% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 0.90 | 2.99 | +0.2 |
| 2013 | 24 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 4 | 1 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 25% | 2.5 | 21.6% | 13.5% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 0.90 | 3.00 | +0.2 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 14 | 12 | 69 | 311 | 57 | 19 | 6 | 86% | 5.0 | 18.3% | 6.1% | 12.2% | 1.8% | 4.93 | 3.33 | +1.8 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 14 | 12 | 69 | 311 | 57 | 19 | 6 | 86% | 5.0 | 18.3% | 6.1% | 12.2% | 1.9% | 4.93 | 3.40 | +1.7 |
| 2015 | 26 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 30 | 30 | 177 | 752 | 148 | 61 | 18 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.7% | 8.1% | 11.6% | 2.3% | 4.11 | 3.72 | +3.6 |
| 2015 | 26 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 30 | 30 | 177 | 752 | 148 | 61 | 18 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.7% | 8.1% | 11.6% | 2.4% | 4.11 | 3.78 | +3.5 |
| 2016 | 27 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 32 | 32 | 179 | 807 | 140 | 84 | 25 | 100% | 5.6 | 17.3% | 10.4% | 6.9% | 3.0% | 4.62 | 4.57 | +1.7 |
| 2016 | 27 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 32 | 32 | 179 | 807 | 140 | 84 | 25 | 100% | 5.6 | 17.3% | 10.4% | 6.9% | 3.1% | 4.62 | 4.76 | +1.3 |
| 2017 | 28 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 29 | 29 | 175 | 728 | 199 | 47 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 27.3% | 6.5% | 20.9% | 2.1% | 3.49 | 2.76 | +5.9 |
| 2017 | 28 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 29 | 29 | 175 | 728 | 199 | 47 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 27.3% | 6.5% | 20.9% | 2.2% | 3.49 | 2.82 | +5.8 |
| 2019 | 30 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 27 | 7 | 63 | 288 | 84 | 40 | 8 | 26% | 2.3 | 26.9% | 14.6% | 12.4% | 2.9% | 5.54 | 4.28 | +0.2 |
| 2019 | 30 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 27 | 7 | 63 | 288 | 84 | 40 | 8 | 26% | 2.3 | 29.2% | 13.9% | 15.3% | 2.8% | 5.54 | 3.98 | +0.4 |
| 2021 | 32 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 28 | 1 | 29 | 116 | 44 | 13 | 0 | 4% | 1.0 | 37.9% | 11.2% | 26.7% | 0.0% | 1.86 | 1.32 | +1.1 |
| 2021 | 32 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 28 | 1 | 29 | 116 | 44 | 13 | 0 | 4% | 1.0 | 37.9% | 11.2% | 26.7% | 0.0% | 1.86 | 1.41 | +1.1 |
| 2023 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 2 | 31 | 149 | 39 | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0.9 | 22.2% | 21.1% | 1.0% | 1.7% | 4.40 | 4.82 | — |
| 2023 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 2 | 31 | 149 | 39 | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0.9 | 26.2% | 22.1% | 4.0% | 1.3% | 4.40 | 4.63 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 147 | 108 | 662 | 2856 | 622 | 245 | 69 | 73% | 4.5 | 21.8% | 8.6% | 13.2% | 2.4% | 4.12 | 3.69 | +13.7 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 147 | 108 | 662 | 2856 | 622 | 245 | 69 | 73% | 4.5 | 21.8% | 8.6% | 13.2% | 2.4% | 4.12 | 3.67 | +13.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 44 | 33 | 200 | 862 | 188 | 74 | 21 | 73% | 4.5 | 21.8% | 8.6% | 13.2% | 2.4% | 4.12 | 3.67 | +4.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 197 | 114 | 734 | 3188 | 707 | 302 | 73 | 58% | 3.7 | 22.2% | 9.5% | 12.7% | 2.3% | 4.17 | 3.68 | +13.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 54 | 31 | 200 | 868 | 192 | 82 | 20 | 58% | 3.7 | 22.2% | 9.5% | 12.7% | 2.3% | 4.17 | 3.68 | +4.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 27 IPFIP 4.73 → 4.82 (+0.08)K% 25.8% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.76% | — | ×0.860 | 22.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 23.48% | — | ×0.900 | 21.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.52% | ÷1.006 | ×1.100 | 1.66% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 4.73 → 4.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAASan Antonio Missions · 40 IPFIP 3.34 → 3.90 (+0.57)K% 32.0% → 28.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.02% | — | ×0.880 | 28.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.48% | — | ×1.050 | 14.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.25% | ÷0.977 | ×1.100 | 2.53% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.34 → 3.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).