Brody Donay
C Charleston RiverDogs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21 | ATB | 39 | .206/.308/.353 | 1 | 1 | 42 | — | .171/.256/.314 |
| 2026 | 22 | A/ROKTB | 180 | .196/.376/.312 | 4 | 6 | 47 | — | .148/.292/.236 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBTB | 290 | .199/.279/.306 | 5 | 7 | 67 | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 24 | MLBTB | 44 | .205/.284/.317 | 1 | 1 | 71 | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBTB | 91 | .208/.287/.324 | 2 | 2 | 73 | 0.1 |
Tools · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 39 | 34 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 206 | 308 | 353 | 661 | 147 | 250 | 23 | 10 | 302 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 156 | 120 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 54 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 200 | 377 | 333 | 710 | 133 | 317 | 35 | 19 | 332 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 24 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 167 | 375 | 167 | 542 | 300 | 33 | 12 | 292 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 39 | 35 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 171 | 256 | 314 | 571 | 143 | 230 | 31 | 8 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 156 | 129 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 73 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 155 | 292 | 256 | 548 | 101 | 294 | 47 | 13 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 24 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 105 | 292 | 105 | 397 | 237 | 50 | 8 | 189 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 39 | 35 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 171 | 256 | 314 | 571 | 143 | 227 | 31 | 8 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 39 | 34 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 206 | 308 | 353 | 661 | 147 | 250 | 23 | 10 | 302 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 180 | 148 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 85 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 149 | 292 | 236 | 529 | 88 | 311 | 47 | 12 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 180 | 138 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 62 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 196 | 376 | 312 | 688 | 116 | 315 | 34 | 18 | 327 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 39 | 35 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 171 | 256 | 314 | 571 | 143 | 230 | 31 | 8 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 180 | 148 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 85 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 149 | 292 | 236 | 529 | 88 | 286 | 47 | 12 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 39 | 35 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 171 | 256 | 314 | 571 | 143 | 230 | 31 | 8 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 180 | 148 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 85 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 149 | 292 | 236 | 529 | 88 | 286 | 47 | 12 | 238 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | TB | 0% | 290 | 259 | 52 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 24 | 96 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 199 | 279 | 306 | 585 | 107 | 289 | 33 | 8 | 267 | 67 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +6 | 0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | TB | 30% | 145 | 130 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 47 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 203 | 282 | 316 | 599 | 113 | 290 | 32 | 8 | 272 | 71 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +3 | 0.1 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | TB | 44% | 206 | 184 | 37 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 66 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 206 | 285 | 324 | 610 | 118 | 291 | 32 | 8 | 277 | 73 | -7 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +4 | 0.2 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | TB | 51% | 261 | 233 | 49 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 82 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 209 | 287 | 331 | 618 | 122 | 290 | 31 | 8 | 280 | 76 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +6 | 0.3 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | TB | 52% | 294 | 263 | 54 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 25 | 91 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 209 | 288 | 332 | 620 | 122 | 290 | 31 | 9 | 281 | 76 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +6 | 0.4 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | TB | 53% | 312 | 279 | 59 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 96 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 209 | 287 | 331 | 618 | 122 | 289 | 31 | 8 | 280 | 76 | -9 | +1 | -1 | +6 | +7 | 0.3 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | TB | 53% | 314 | 281 | 59 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 98 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 207 | 284 | 325 | 609 | 118 | 287 | 31 | 8 | 276 | 73 | -10 | +1 | -1 | +6 | +7 | 0.2 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | TB | 52% | 312 | 279 | 57 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 26 | 98 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 204 | 281 | 317 | 597 | 113 | 285 | 31 | 8 | 272 | 70 | -11 | +1 | -2 | +6 | +7 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | TB | 30% | 44 | 39 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 284 | 317 | 601 | 111 | 294 | 32 | 9 | 273 | 71 | -2 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +1 | 0.0 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | TB | 44% | 91 | 82 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 208 | 287 | 324 | 611 | 116 | 294 | 32 | 9 | 277 | 73 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +2 | 0.1 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | TB | 51% | 132 | 118 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 41 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 210 | 289 | 330 | 619 | 120 | 294 | 31 | 8 | 280 | 76 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | 0.2 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | TB | 52% | 154 | 138 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 48 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 211 | 289 | 331 | 621 | 120 | 293 | 31 | 8 | 281 | 76 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +3 | 0.2 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | TB | 53% | 166 | 149 | 32 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 51 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 211 | 289 | 331 | 620 | 120 | 292 | 31 | 8 | 281 | 76 | -5 | +0 | -0 | +3 | +4 | 0.2 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | TB | 53% | 165 | 148 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 51 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 209 | 286 | 324 | 610 | 116 | 291 | 31 | 8 | 277 | 73 | -5 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | 0.1 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | TB | 52% | 163 | 147 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 51 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 205 | 282 | 316 | 599 | 111 | 288 | 31 | 8 | 272 | 70 | -6 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +4 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 915 | 821 | 172 | 28 | 6 | 19 | 77 | 285 | 12 | 22 | 6 | 210 | 287 | 328 | 614 | 118 | 293 | 31 | 8 | 278 | 71 | -29 | +2 | -2 | +16 | +20 | 0.8 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 583 | 122 | 20 | 4 | 13 | 55 | 202 | 9 | 16 | 4 | 209 | 288 | 324 | 612 | 115 | 293 | 31 | 8 | 278 | 71 | -20 | +1 | -2 | +12 | +14 | 0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2167 | 1924 | 388 | 64 | 14 | 45 | 188 | 709 | 36 | 57 | 14 | 202 | 285 | 320 | 605 | 118 | 290 | 33 | 9 | 272 | 71 | -62 | +5 | -4 | +35 | +42 | 1.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 577 | 115 | 19 | 4 | 13 | 56 | 213 | 11 | 17 | 4 | 199 | 283 | 314 | 596 | 114 | 287 | 33 | 9 | 272 | 71 | -21 | +2 | -1 | +12 | +14 | 0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 156 PAwOBA .327 → .245 (−82)K% 34.6% → 47.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.62% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 47.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.59% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 12.70% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.21% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 2.47% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.043 | ×0.990 | 24.46% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.043 | ×0.990 | 2.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.043 | ×0.990 | 1.42% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 4.80% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.043.
Result: wOBA .327 → .245; ISO .133 → .097; BABIP .317 → .294. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Rays · 24 PAwOBA .286 → .189 (−97)K% 33.3% → 48.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.33% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 48.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 7.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 12.50% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 8.69% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 23.74% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .286 → .189; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .300 → .237. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 39 PAwOBA .295 → .231 (−64)K% 23.1% → 31.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.08% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 31.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.26% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | — | 7.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.56% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 2.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.00% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | — | — | 14.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.00% | ÷0.850 | ×0.830 | — | — | 7.81% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.00% | ÷1.159 | ×0.800 | — | — | 2.76% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .295 → .231; ISO .147 → .110; BABIP .250 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).