Brooks Caple
P Knoxville Smokies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 21 | 98 | 4.48 | 3.70 | 17.3% | 10.0% | — | K 13.1% · BB 11.7% · FIP 4.34 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 22 | 21 | 108 | 3.09 | 3.04 | 25.5% | 7.3% | — | K 20.4% · BB 8.1% · FIP 3.81 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBCHC | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4.61 | 4.61 | 18.6% | 9.3% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBCHC | 8 | 8 | 46 | 4.45 | 4.41 | 19.7% | 8.9% | 0.5 | |
| 2029PROJ67% MLB | 26 | MLBCHC | 11 | 11 | 64 | 4.38 | 4.35 | 20.3% | 8.8% | 0.7 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 98 | 428 | 74 | 43 | 6 | 100% | 4.7 | 13.1% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 4.48 | 4.34 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 98 | 428 | 74 | 43 | 6 | 100% | 4.7 | 13.1% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 4.48 | 4.34 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 98 | 428 | 74 | 43 | 6 | 100% | 4.7 | 17.3% | 10.0% | 7.2% | 1.4% | 4.48 | 3.70 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 21 | 108 | 424 | 108 | 31 | 9 | 95% | 4.9 | 20.4% | 8.1% | 12.3% | 2.6% | 3.09 | 3.81 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 21 | 108 | 424 | 108 | 31 | 9 | 95% | 4.9 | 20.4% | 8.1% | 12.3% | 2.6% | 3.09 | 3.81 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 21 | 108 | 424 | 108 | 31 | 9 | 95% | 4.9 | 25.5% | 7.3% | 18.2% | 2.1% | 3.09 | 3.04 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | CHC | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 3.0 | 18.6% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 2.8% | 4.61 | 4.61 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | CHC | 18 | 18 | 104 | 440 | 87 | 39 | 12 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.7% | 8.9% | 10.8% | 2.8% | 4.51 | 4.47 | +1.1 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | CHC | 16 | 16 | 96 | 407 | 83 | 36 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.3% | 8.8% | 11.5% | 2.8% | 4.44 | 4.41 | +1.1 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | CHC | 15 | 15 | 92 | 387 | 79 | 34 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.3% | 8.8% | 11.6% | 2.9% | 4.44 | 4.44 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | CHC | 14 | 14 | 87 | 366 | 74 | 33 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.3% | 8.9% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.49 | 4.52 | +0.9 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | CHC | 13 | 13 | 80 | 339 | 68 | 31 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.0% | 9.1% | 10.9% | 3.1% | 4.59 | 4.65 | +0.7 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | CHC | 12 | 12 | 73 | 307 | 60 | 29 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.7% | 9.4% | 10.3% | 3.3% | 4.73 | 4.83 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB MLE | CHC | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 53 | 27 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.3% | 9.8% | 9.5% | 3.5% | 4.91 | 5.03 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | CHC | 8 | 8 | 46 | 194 | 38 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.7% | 8.9% | 10.8% | 2.7% | 4.45 | 4.41 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | CHC | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 55 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.3% | 8.8% | 11.5% | 2.7% | 4.38 | 4.35 | +0.7 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | CHC | 12 | 12 | 71 | 300 | 61 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.3% | 8.8% | 11.6% | 2.7% | 4.38 | 4.38 | +0.8 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | CHC | 12 | 12 | 73 | 308 | 62 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.3% | 8.9% | 11.4% | 2.8% | 4.43 | 4.46 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | CHC | 12 | 12 | 70 | 296 | 59 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.0% | 9.1% | 10.9% | 3.0% | 4.53 | 4.59 | +0.6 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | CHC | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 54 | 26 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.7% | 9.4% | 10.3% | 3.2% | 4.66 | 4.76 | +0.4 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB CTX | CHC | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 49 | 25 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.3% | 9.8% | 9.5% | 3.4% | 4.84 | 4.96 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 75 | 75 | 450 | 1899 | 379 | 173 | 56 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.0% | 9.1% | 10.9% | 2.9% | 4.52 | 4.18 | +6.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 168 | 77 | 25 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.0% | 9.1% | 10.9% | 2.9% | 4.52 | 4.18 | +2.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 43 | 42 | 206 | 852 | 143 | 84 | 18 | 98% | 4.8 | 16.7% | 9.9% | 6.8% | 2.1% | 3.76 | 4.08 | +5.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 42 | 41 | 200 | 827 | 138 | 82 | 17 | 98% | 4.8 | 16.7% | 9.9% | 6.8% | 2.1% | 3.76 | 4.08 | +1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAKnoxville Smokies · 86 IPFIP 3.29 → 4.03 (+0.74)K% 24.3% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.33% | — | ×0.810 | 19.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.42% | — | ×1.100 | 8.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.37% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 2.85% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.29 → 4.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+South Bend Cubs · 22 IPFIP 2.08 → 2.95 (+0.87)K% 29.9% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.89% | — | ×0.770 | 23.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.90% | — | ×1.150 | 7.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.15% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 1.44% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.08 → 2.95, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+South Bend Cubs · 63 IPFIP 4.22 → 4.86 (+0.63)K% 15.2% → 11.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.22% | — | ×0.770 | 11.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.03% | — | ×1.150 | 11.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.08% | ÷1.106 | ×1.250 | 2.35% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 4.22 → 4.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 35 IPFIP 2.55 → 3.26 (+0.70)K% 21.6% → 16.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.58% | — | ×0.740 | 15.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.07% | — | ×1.180 | 11.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.925 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 2.55 → 3.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.6 | 91 | 19.7% | 9.1% | 1.15 | 4.57 |
| Odell Jones ('75-'88, 2 WAR*) | 2.7 | 78 | 20.8%* | 8.8%* | 1.18* | 4.62* |
| Scott Sanders ('99) | 3.4 | 97 | 21.2% | 9.3% | 1.23 | 4.86 |
| Marvin Freeman ('86-'96, 5 WAR*) | 3.0 | 74 | 17.7%* | 9.6%* | 1.19* | 4.33* |
| Adam Conley ('21) | 2.2 | 87 | 19.8% | 9.4% | 1.16 | 4.71 |
| Bud Norris ('18) | 6.1 | 122 | 21.7% | 9.1% | 1.15 | 4.45 |
| Lerrin LaGrow ('70-'80, 2 WAR*) | 3.9 | 87 | 16.8%* | 9.1%* | 1.23* | 4.50* |