Ty Cummings
P Arkansas Travelers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | A+SEA | 25 | 25 | 117 | 4.17 | 3.61 | 24.7% | 9.2% | — | K 19.0% · BB 10.5% · FIP 4.34 |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 29 | 20 | 123 | 3.29 | 4.27 | 17.6% | 7.7% | — | K 14.2% · BB 8.3% · FIP 4.99 |
| 2026 | 24 | AASEA | 40 | 0 | 62 | 5.66 | 5.25 | 18.4% | 7.9% | — | K 14.9% · BB 8.7% · FIP 6.04 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBSEA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.54 | 5.54 | 13.5% | 9.4% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBSEA | 34 | 0 | 36 | 5.37 | 5.34 | 15.2% | 9.2% | -0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 27 | MLBSEA | 43 | 0 | 45 | 5.29 | 5.29 | 15.7% | 9.2% | -0.4 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Everett AquaSox | 25 | 25 | 117 | 502 | 124 | 46 | 13 | 100% | 4.7 | 19.0% | 10.5% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 4.17 | 4.34 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Everett AquaSox | 25 | 25 | 117 | 502 | 124 | 46 | 13 | 100% | 4.7 | 19.0% | 10.5% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 4.17 | 4.34 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ RAW | Everett AquaSox | 25 | 25 | 117 | 502 | 124 | 46 | 13 | 100% | 4.7 | 24.7% | 9.2% | 15.5% | 2.6% | 4.17 | 3.61 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 20 | 123 | 522 | 92 | 40 | 16 | 69% | 4.2 | 14.2% | 8.3% | 5.9% | 3.7% | 3.29 | 4.99 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 20 | 123 | 522 | 92 | 40 | 16 | 69% | 4.2 | 14.2% | 8.3% | 5.9% | 3.7% | 3.29 | 4.99 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 20 | 123 | 522 | 92 | 40 | 16 | 69% | 4.2 | 17.6% | 7.7% | 10.0% | 3.1% | 3.29 | 4.27 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Arkansas Travelers | 40 | 0 | 62 | 277 | 51 | 22 | 13 | 0% | 1.6 | 14.9% | 8.7% | 6.2% | 5.6% | 5.66 | 6.04 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Arkansas Travelers | 40 | 0 | 62 | 277 | 51 | 22 | 13 | 0% | 1.6 | 14.9% | 8.7% | 6.2% | 5.6% | 5.66 | 6.04 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA RAW | Arkansas Travelers | 40 | 0 | 62 | 277 | 51 | 22 | 13 | 0% | 1.6 | 18.4% | 7.9% | 10.5% | 4.7% | 5.66 | 5.25 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | SEA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 13.5% | 9.4% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 5.54 | 5.54 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | SEA | 78 | 0 | 82 | 348 | 53 | 32 | 12 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.2% | 9.2% | 6.0% | 3.6% | 5.37 | 5.34 | -0.7 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | SEA | 68 | 0 | 71 | 300 | 47 | 28 | 11 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.7% | 9.2% | 6.5% | 3.6% | 5.29 | 5.29 | -0.6 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | SEA | 62 | 0 | 65 | 274 | 44 | 25 | 10 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.9% | 9.3% | 6.6% | 3.7% | 5.29 | 5.32 | -0.5 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | SEA | 57 | 0 | 60 | 252 | 40 | 24 | 10 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.8% | 9.4% | 6.3% | 3.8% | 5.36 | 5.43 | -0.6 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | SEA | 52 | 0 | 54 | 230 | 35 | 22 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.4% | 9.8% | 5.7% | 4.0% | 5.51 | 5.61 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | SEA | 34 | 0 | 36 | 152 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.2% | 9.2% | 6.0% | 3.6% | 5.37 | 5.34 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | SEA | 43 | 0 | 45 | 190 | 30 | 17 | 7 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.7% | 9.2% | 6.5% | 3.6% | 5.29 | 5.29 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | SEA | 47 | 0 | 49 | 207 | 33 | 19 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.9% | 9.3% | 6.6% | 3.7% | 5.29 | 5.32 | -0.4 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | SEA | 47 | 0 | 49 | 207 | 33 | 20 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.8% | 9.4% | 6.3% | 3.8% | 5.36 | 5.43 | -0.5 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | SEA | 45 | 0 | 47 | 198 | 31 | 19 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.4% | 9.8% | 5.7% | 4.0% | 5.51 | 5.61 | -0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 215 | 0 | 226 | 953 | 149 | 89 | 36 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.6% | 9.4% | 6.2% | 3.7% | 5.36 | 5.02 | -1.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 132 | 79 | 32 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.6% | 9.4% | 6.2% | 3.7% | 5.36 | 5.02 | -1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 94 | 45 | 302 | 1301 | 211 | 120 | 49 | 48% | 3.2 | 16.2% | 9.3% | 7.0% | 3.8% | 4.12 | 4.96 | -3.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 62 | 30 | 200 | 863 | 140 | 80 | 32 | 48% | 3.2 | 16.2% | 9.3% | 7.0% | 3.8% | 4.12 | 4.96 | -1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAArkansas Travelers · 62 IPFIP 5.13 → 6.04 (+0.91)K% 18.4% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.41% | — | ×0.810 | 14.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.94% | — | ×1.100 | 8.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.69% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 5.63% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.13 → 6.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 116 IPFIP 4.14 → 4.99 (+0.85)K% 17.5% → 14.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.52% | — | ×0.810 | 14.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.54% | — | ×1.100 | 8.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.85% | ÷0.922 | ×1.200 | 3.71% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 4.14 → 4.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAADurham Bulls · 7 IPFIP 6.23 → 5.62 (−0.61)K% 19.4% → 16.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.35% | — | ×0.860 | 16.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×0.900 | 8.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.45% | ÷1.380 | ×1.100 | 5.14% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 176).
Result: FIP 6.23 → 5.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Everett AquaSox · 117 IPFIP 3.60 → 4.34 (+0.74)K% 24.7% → 19.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.70% | — | ×0.770 | 19.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.16% | — | ×1.150 | 10.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.59% | ÷1.175 | ×1.250 | 2.75% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 135).
Result: FIP 3.60 → 4.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.0 | 67 | 15.2% | 9.4% | 1.43 | 5.39 |
| Lance Painter ('03) | 2.2 | 56 | 16.7% | 9.0% | 1.32 | 5.24 |
| Mike Lincoln ('10) | 1.9 | 54 | 14.1% | 8.9% | 1.32 | 5.33 |
| Jose Cabrera ('02) | 1.4 | 68 | 16.2% | 7.9% | 1.39 | 4.95 |
| Chuck Hartenstein ('66-'77, -1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 59 | 13.7%* | 7.2%* | 1.50* | 5.28* |
| Randy St. Claire ('84-'94, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 50 | 19.0%* | 8.4%* | 1.39* | 4.61* |
| Phil Hennigan ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 70 | 20.9%* | 10.4%* | 1.50* | 4.95* |