Hunter Owen
P Northwest Arkansas Naturals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | A+KC | 23 | 22 | 102 | 4.24 | 3.49 | 18.9% | 7.5% | — | K 14.5% · BB 8.7% · FIP 4.32 |
| 2025 | 23 | AANorthwest Ark… | 22 | 19 | 95 | 3.80 | 3.48 | 25.9% | 9.7% | — | K 21.0% · BB 10.7% · FIP 4.16 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 17 | 98 | 5.97 | 4.47 | 25.2% | 9.4% | — | K 20.4% · BB 10.3% · FIP 5.29 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBKC | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.98 | 4.98 | 20.3% | 10.4% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBKC | 7 | 7 | 44 | 4.75 | 4.74 | 20.8% | 10.1% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 27 | MLBKC | 10 | 10 | 58 | 4.72 | 4.73 | 20.8% | 10.0% | 0.4 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | 23 | 22 | 102 | 424 | 80 | 32 | 8 | 96% | 4.4 | 14.5% | 8.7% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 4.24 | 4.32 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | 23 | 22 | 102 | 424 | 80 | 32 | 8 | 96% | 4.4 | 14.5% | 8.7% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 4.24 | 4.32 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ RAW | Quad Cities River Bandits | 23 | 22 | 102 | 424 | 80 | 32 | 8 | 96% | 4.4 | 18.9% | 7.5% | 11.3% | 1.9% | 4.24 | 3.49 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Northwest Arkansas Naturals | 22 | 19 | 95 | 413 | 107 | 40 | 10 | 86% | 4.3 | 21.0% | 10.7% | 10.3% | 2.7% | 3.80 | 4.16 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA MLE | Northwest Arkansas Naturals | 22 | 19 | 95 | 413 | 107 | 40 | 10 | 86% | 4.3 | 21.0% | 10.7% | 10.3% | 2.7% | 3.80 | 4.16 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | AA RAW | Northwest Arkansas Naturals | 22 | 19 | 95 | 413 | 107 | 40 | 10 | 86% | 4.3 | 25.9% | 9.7% | 16.2% | 2.4% | 3.80 | 3.48 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 17 | 98 | 449 | 113 | 42 | 18 | 65% | 3.8 | 20.4% | 10.3% | 10.2% | 4.8% | 5.97 | 5.29 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 17 | 98 | 449 | 113 | 42 | 18 | 65% | 3.8 | 20.4% | 10.3% | 10.2% | 4.8% | 5.97 | 5.29 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 17 | 98 | 449 | 113 | 42 | 18 | 65% | 3.8 | 25.2% | 9.4% | 15.8% | 4.0% | 5.97 | 4.47 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | KC | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 20.3% | 10.4% | 9.9% | 3.5% | 4.98 | 4.98 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | KC | 17 | 17 | 101 | 426 | 88 | 43 | 15 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.8% | 10.1% | 10.7% | 3.4% | 4.89 | 4.88 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | KC | 15 | 15 | 91 | 384 | 80 | 38 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.8% | 10.0% | 10.8% | 3.4% | 4.86 | 4.87 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | KC | 14 | 14 | 85 | 358 | 74 | 36 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.8% | 10.0% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 4.88 | 4.92 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | KC | 13 | 13 | 78 | 330 | 68 | 34 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.6% | 10.2% | 10.4% | 3.6% | 4.97 | 5.04 | +0.3 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | KC | 12 | 12 | 70 | 298 | 60 | 31 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.2% | 10.5% | 9.7% | 3.8% | 5.12 | 5.21 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | KC | 7 | 7 | 44 | 186 | 39 | 19 | 6 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.8% | 10.1% | 10.7% | 3.2% | 4.75 | 4.74 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | KC | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 51 | 24 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.8% | 10.0% | 10.8% | 3.2% | 4.72 | 4.73 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | KC | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 56 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.8% | 10.0% | 10.7% | 3.2% | 4.74 | 4.78 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | KC | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 56 | 28 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.6% | 10.2% | 10.4% | 3.4% | 4.82 | 4.89 | +0.3 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | KC | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 52 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.2% | 10.5% | 9.7% | 3.6% | 4.96 | 5.05 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 48 | 48 | 290 | 1225 | 253 | 125 | 41 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.6% | 10.2% | 10.5% | 3.3% | 4.80 | 4.46 | +3.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 174 | 86 | 28 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.6% | 10.2% | 10.5% | 3.3% | 4.80 | 4.46 | +2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 71 | 58 | 295 | 1286 | 240 | 127 | 43 | 82% | 4.2 | 18.7% | 9.9% | 8.8% | 3.3% | 4.67 | 4.61 | +2.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 48 | 39 | 200 | 873 | 163 | 86 | 29 | 82% | 4.2 | 18.7% | 9.9% | 8.8% | 3.3% | 4.67 | 4.61 | +1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 94 IPFIP 4.33 → 5.29 (+0.96)K% 25.2% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.23% | — | ×0.810 | 20.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.35% | — | ×1.100 | 10.28% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.97% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 4.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.33 → 5.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 4 IPFIP 4.91 → 5.33 (+0.42)K% 23.8% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.81% | — | ×0.860 | 20.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.52% | — | ×0.900 | 8.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.76% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 5.24% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.91 → 5.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 95 IPFIP 3.47 → 4.16 (+0.69)K% 25.9% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.91% | — | ×0.810 | 20.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.69% | — | ×1.100 | 10.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.42% | ÷1.077 | ×1.200 | 2.70% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).
Result: FIP 3.47 → 4.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Quad Cities River Bandits · 102 IPFIP 3.50 → 4.32 (+0.82)K% 18.9% → 14.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.87% | — | ×0.770 | 14.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.55% | — | ×1.150 | 8.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.89% | ÷0.959 | ×1.250 | 2.46% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 3.50 → 4.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.7 | 91 | 20.6% | 10.2% | 1.37 | 4.94 |
| Vicente Palacios ('87-'00, 1 WAR*) | 1.9 | 62 | 21.0%* | 10.0%* | 1.41* | 4.86* |
| Scott Sanders ('99) | 3.4 | 97 | 21.2% | 9.3% | 1.23 | 4.86 |
| Wes Gardner ('84-'91, -0 WAR*) | 2.3 | 78 | 23.2%* | 10.4%* | 1.24* | 5.03* |
| Mickey Mahler ('77-'86, 0 WAR*) | 2.0 | 81 | 20.4%* | 10.3%* | 1.20* | 4.87* |
| Jake Faria ('23) | 1.0 | 68 | 20.9% | 10.3% | 1.32 | 4.87 |
| Joey Wentz ('25) | 1.5 | 76 | 21.1% | 9.9% | 1.36 | 5.57 |