Trey Gibson
P Norfolk Tides| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 16 | 92 | 3.72 | 2.23 | 30.3% | 10.0% | — | K 22.7% · BB 11.7% · FIP 3.22 |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 26 | 25 | 120 | 4.26 | 2.84 | 32.3% | 8.6% | — | K 25.9% · BB 9.1% · FIP 3.54 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 29 | 28 | 131 | 4.87 | 4.18 | 21.2% | 10.3% | 1.9 | K 19.1% · BB 9.8% · FIP 4.29 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBBAL | 7 | 7 | 42 | 4.66 | 4.60 | 21.8% | 10.1% | 0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ84% MLB | 26 | MLBBAL | 11 | 11 | 64 | 4.63 | 4.57 | 22.6% | 9.8% | 0.7 | |
| 2029PROJ88% MLB | 27 | MLBBAL | 11 | 11 | 67 | 4.60 | 4.59 | 22.5% | 9.8% | 0.7 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Orioles | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 2.0 | 25.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 2.57 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Orioles | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 2.0 | 25.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 2.60 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 16 | 92 | 389 | 118 | 39 | 3 | 64% | 3.7 | 22.7% | 11.7% | 11.0% | 1.0% | 3.72 | 3.22 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 16 | 92 | 389 | 118 | 39 | 3 | 64% | 3.7 | 22.7% | 11.7% | 11.0% | 1.0% | 3.72 | 3.22 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 16 | 92 | 389 | 118 | 39 | 3 | 64% | 3.7 | 30.3% | 10.0% | 20.3% | 0.8% | 3.72 | 2.23 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 25 | 120 | 514 | 166 | 44 | 13 | 96% | 4.6 | 25.9% | 9.1% | 16.9% | 2.7% | 4.26 | 3.54 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 25 | 120 | 514 | 166 | 44 | 13 | 96% | 4.6 | 25.9% | 9.1% | 16.9% | 2.7% | 4.26 | 3.54 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 25 | 120 | 514 | 166 | 44 | 13 | 96% | 4.6 | 32.3% | 8.6% | 23.7% | 2.5% | 4.26 | 2.84 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 28 | 131 | 580 | 123 | 60 | 16 | 97% | 4.5 | 19.1% | 9.8% | 9.4% | 2.9% | 4.87 | 4.29 | +1.7 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 28 | 131 | 580 | 123 | 60 | 16 | 97% | 4.5 | 19.1% | 9.8% | 9.4% | 2.9% | 4.87 | 4.29 | +1.7 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 28 | 131 | 580 | 123 | 60 | 16 | 97% | 4.5 | 21.2% | 10.3% | 10.9% | 2.8% | 4.87 | 4.18 | +1.9 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 9 | 8 | 40 | 185 | 37 | 27 | 7 | 89% | 4.4 | 20.0% | 14.6% | 5.4% | 3.8% | 6.13 | 5.57 | -0.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | BAL | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 39 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.8% | 10.1% | 11.7% | 3.1% | 4.66 | 4.60 | +0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | BAL | 13 | 13 | 76 | 319 | 72 | 31 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.6% | 9.8% | 12.8% | 3.1% | 4.55 | 4.49 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | BAL | 13 | 13 | 76 | 323 | 73 | 31 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.5% | 9.8% | 12.8% | 3.1% | 4.52 | 4.51 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | BAL | 12 | 12 | 74 | 311 | 70 | 30 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 9.8% | 12.6% | 3.2% | 4.55 | 4.58 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | BAL | 11 | 11 | 64 | 269 | 59 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.8% | 10.0% | 11.8% | 3.3% | 4.66 | 4.74 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | BAL | 9 | 9 | 51 | 217 | 46 | 22 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.1% | 10.3% | 10.8% | 3.5% | 4.83 | 4.94 | +0.3 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB MLE | BAL | 6 | 6 | 39 | 164 | 33 | 17 | 6 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.3% | 10.6% | 9.7% | 3.8% | 5.04 | 5.17 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | BAL | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 61 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.6% | 9.8% | 12.8% | 3.2% | 4.63 | 4.57 | +0.7 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | BAL | 11 | 11 | 67 | 283 | 64 | 28 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.5% | 9.8% | 12.8% | 3.2% | 4.60 | 4.59 | +0.7 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | BAL | 11 | 11 | 67 | 283 | 63 | 28 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 9.8% | 12.6% | 3.3% | 4.63 | 4.66 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | BAL | 10 | 10 | 59 | 249 | 54 | 25 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.8% | 10.0% | 11.8% | 3.5% | 4.74 | 4.82 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | BAL | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 43 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.1% | 10.3% | 10.8% | 3.7% | 4.92 | 5.03 | +0.3 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB CTX | BAL | 6 | 6 | 36 | 152 | 31 | 16 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.3% | 10.6% | 9.7% | 3.9% | 5.13 | 5.26 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 66 | 65 | 380 | 1623 | 353 | 171 | 56 | 98% | 5.8 | 21.7% | 10.5% | 11.2% | 3.5% | 4.88 | 4.50 | +4.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 35 | 34 | 200 | 854 | 186 | 90 | 29 | 98% | 5.8 | 21.7% | 10.5% | 11.2% | 3.5% | 4.88 | 4.50 | +2.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 81 | 69 | 346 | 1491 | 335 | 150 | 34 | 85% | 4.3 | 22.4% | 10.1% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 4.32 | 3.75 | +3.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 47 | 40 | 200 | 863 | 194 | 87 | 20 | 85% | 4.3 | 22.4% | 10.1% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 4.32 | 3.75 | +1.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAANorfolk Tides · 92 IPFIP 3.57 → 3.85 (+0.28)K% 21.8% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.77% | — | ×0.860 | 18.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.35% | — | ×0.900 | 7.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.28% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.51% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.57 → 3.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAChesapeake Baysox · 52 IPFIP 1.71 → 2.33 (+0.62)K% 32.5% → 26.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.54% | — | ×0.810 | 26.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.61% | — | ×1.100 | 9.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.48% | ÷1.248 | ×1.200 | 0.46% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 150).
Result: FIP 1.71 → 2.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 39 IPFIP 3.07 → 4.06 (+0.98)K% 40.4% → 31.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.36% | — | ×0.770 | 31.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.43% | — | ×1.150 | 9.70% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.22% | ÷1.229 | ×1.250 | 4.29% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).
Result: FIP 3.07 → 4.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAANorfolk Tides · 29 IPFIP 4.28 → 4.76 (+0.48)K% 22.3% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.30% | — | ×0.860 | 19.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.63% | — | ×0.900 | 7.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.60% | ÷0.945 | ×1.100 | 4.19% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 4.28 → 4.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ADelmarva Shorebirds · 56 IPFIP 1.95 → 3.11 (+1.16)K% 34.5% → 25.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.47% | — | ×0.740 | 25.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.21% | — | ×1.180 | 12.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.85% | ÷0.952 | ×1.300 | 1.16% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 1.95 → 3.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 36 IPFIP 2.66 → 3.39 (+0.73)K% 24.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.03% | — | ×0.770 | 18.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.74% | — | ×1.150 | 11.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.65% | ÷1.026 | ×1.250 | 0.79% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 2.66 → 3.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.4 | 59 | 21.8% | 10.4% | 1.28 | 4.77 |
| Buck Farmer ('24) | 2.6 | 51 | 21.6% | 10.5% | 1.24 | 4.71 |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Scott Service ('04) | 2.1 | 46 | 22.2% | 9.9% | 1.23 | 5.04 |
| Bill Scherrer ('82-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.6 | 62 | 20.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.19* | 4.44* |
| Bill Pleis ('61-'66, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 56 | 19.7%* | 9.8%* | 1.15* | 4.53* |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |