Izaac Pacheco
3B Erie SeaWolves| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | A+/ADET | 330 | .224/.302/.349 | 7 | 4 | 32 | — | .164/.222/.252 |
| 2025 | 22 | A+DET | 425 | .258/.391/.499 | 17 | 0 | 90 | — | .203/.296/.403 |
| 2026 | 23 | AADET | 378 | .232/.343/.483 | 21 | 5 | 78 | — | .193/.273/.381 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 24 | MLBDET | 4 | .187/.267/.353 | 0 | 0 | 78 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ23% MLB | 25 | MLBDET | 56 | .191/.271/.361 | 2 | 0 | 81 | -0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ35% MLB | 26 | MLBDET | 102 | .193/.274/.364 | 4 | 1 | 83 | 0.0 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK | FCL Tigers West | — | 125 | 106 | 24 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 226 | 336 | 330 | 666 | 104 | 371 | 34 | 14 | 307 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 73 | 60 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 183 | 290 | 367 | 657 | 183 | 182 | 23 | 12 | 281 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 371 | 330 | 88 | 21 | 2 | 8 | 38 | 80 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 267 | 344 | 415 | 759 | 148 | 328 | 22 | 10 | 339 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 508 | 455 | 96 | 22 | 3 | 12 | 47 | 160 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 211 | 286 | 352 | 638 | 141 | 292 | 31 | 9 | 285 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 280 | 254 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 96 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 220 | 288 | 354 | 642 | 134 | 320 | 34 | 8 | 288 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 50 | 41 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 244 | 380 | 317 | 697 | 73 | 385 | 30 | 18 | 329 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 425 | 341 | 88 | 25 | 3 | 17 | 74 | 123 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 258 | 391 | 499 | 890 | 240 | 343 | 29 | 17 | 387 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA | Erie SeaWolves | — | 378 | 319 | 74 | 13 | 2 | 21 | 52 | 130 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 232 | 343 | 483 | 826 | 251 | 306 | 34 | 14 | 359 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers West | — | 125 | 114 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 61 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 132 | 200 | 193 | 393 | 61 | 285 | 49 | 8 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 73 | 63 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 175 | 246 | 349 | 596 | 175 | 168 | 32 | 8 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 371 | 342 | 72 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 26 | 111 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 211 | 268 | 316 | 584 | 105 | 289 | 30 | 7 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 508 | 467 | 77 | 16 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 202 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 165 | 225 | 272 | 497 | 107 | 254 | 40 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 280 | 261 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 127 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 161 | 212 | 257 | 469 | 96 | 281 | 45 | 5 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 50 | 44 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 182 | 280 | 227 | 507 | 45 | 324 | 40 | 12 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 425 | 370 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 16 | 47 | 163 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 203 | 296 | 403 | 699 | 200 | 289 | 38 | 11 | 301 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 378 | 336 | 65 | 11 | 2 | 16 | 35 | 159 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 193 | 273 | 381 | 654 | 187 | 282 | 42 | 9 | 284 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers West | — | 125 | 115 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 61 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 130 | 200 | 191 | 391 | 61 | 264 | 49 | 8 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers West | — | 125 | 106 | 24 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 226 | 336 | 330 | 666 | 104 | 371 | 34 | 14 | 307 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 444 | 405 | 83 | 19 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 133 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 205 | 265 | 321 | 586 | 116 | 278 | 30 | 7 | 256 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 444 | 390 | 99 | 23 | 2 | 11 | 47 | 97 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 254 | 336 | 408 | 743 | 154 | 306 | 22 | 11 | 329 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 508 | 467 | 77 | 16 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 202 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 165 | 225 | 272 | 497 | 107 | 258 | 40 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A+ RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 508 | 455 | 96 | 22 | 3 | 12 | 47 | 160 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 211 | 286 | 352 | 638 | 141 | 292 | 31 | 9 | 285 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 330 | 305 | 50 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 147 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 164 | 223 | 252 | 475 | 89 | 290 | 45 | 6 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 330 | 295 | 66 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 31 | 111 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 224 | 302 | 349 | 651 | 125 | 330 | 34 | 9 | 294 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 425 | 370 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 16 | 47 | 163 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 203 | 296 | 403 | 699 | 200 | 299 | 38 | 11 | 301 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 425 | 341 | 88 | 25 | 3 | 17 | 74 | 123 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 258 | 391 | 499 | 890 | 240 | 343 | 29 | 17 | 387 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 378 | 336 | 65 | 11 | 2 | 16 | 35 | 159 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 193 | 273 | 381 | 654 | 187 | 295 | 42 | 9 | 284 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA RAW | Erie SeaWolves | — | 378 | 319 | 74 | 13 | 2 | 21 | 52 | 130 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 232 | 343 | 483 | 826 | 251 | 306 | 34 | 14 | 359 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers West | — | 125 | 114 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 61 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 132 | 200 | 193 | 393 | 61 | 285 | 49 | 8 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 444 | 408 | 83 | 19 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 133 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 203 | 265 | 319 | 583 | 115 | 269 | 30 | 7 | 256 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 508 | 467 | 77 | 16 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 202 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 165 | 225 | 272 | 497 | 107 | 254 | 40 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 330 | 304 | 50 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 147 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 164 | 223 | 253 | 476 | 89 | 288 | 45 | 6 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 425 | 373 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 16 | 47 | 163 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 201 | 296 | 399 | 695 | 198 | 289 | 38 | 11 | 301 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 378 | 338 | 65 | 11 | 2 | 16 | 35 | 159 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 192 | 273 | 379 | 652 | 186 | 282 | 42 | 9 | 284 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 330 | 304 | 50 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 147 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 164 | 223 | 253 | 476 | 89 | 288 | 45 | 6 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 425 | 373 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 16 | 47 | 163 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 201 | 296 | 399 | 695 | 198 | 289 | 38 | 11 | 301 | 90 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 378 | 338 | 65 | 11 | 2 | 16 | 35 | 159 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 192 | 273 | 379 | 652 | 186 | 282 | 42 | 9 | 284 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 2% | 380 | 340 | 65 | 13 | 2 | 14 | 35 | 144 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 191 | 271 | 364 | 635 | 173 | 274 | 38 | 9 | 283 | 78 | -10 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +8 | 0.2 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB CTX | DET | 2% | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 187 | 267 | 353 | 621 | 167 | 269 | 50 | 0 | 277 | 78 | -0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 23% | 244 | 218 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 23 | 90 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 195 | 275 | 371 | 646 | 176 | 276 | 37 | 9 | 287 | 81 | -6 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +5 | 0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 35% | 292 | 261 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 27 | 106 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 198 | 278 | 375 | 652 | 177 | 277 | 36 | 9 | 290 | 83 | -6 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +6 | 0.1 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 40% | 314 | 280 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 29 | 112 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 199 | 279 | 374 | 653 | 175 | 277 | 36 | 9 | 291 | 83 | -6 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +7 | 0.1 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 44% | 323 | 288 | 57 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 30 | 114 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 200 | 279 | 371 | 651 | 172 | 277 | 35 | 9 | 290 | 82 | -7 | +0 | -2 | +1 | +7 | 0.0 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 45% | 317 | 283 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 29 | 111 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 279 | 367 | 646 | 168 | 277 | 35 | 9 | 288 | 81 | -7 | +0 | -2 | +1 | +7 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 45% | 312 | 279 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 28 | 110 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 197 | 275 | 360 | 635 | 163 | 275 | 35 | 9 | 284 | 78 | -8 | +0 | -3 | +1 | +7 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 23% | 56 | 51 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 191 | 271 | 361 | 632 | 170 | 271 | 38 | 9 | 282 | 81 | -1 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +1 | -0.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 35% | 102 | 90 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 193 | 274 | 364 | 638 | 171 | 272 | 36 | 10 | 285 | 83 | -2 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +2 | 0.0 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 40% | 127 | 113 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 195 | 275 | 364 | 639 | 169 | 272 | 35 | 9 | 285 | 83 | -3 | +0 | -0 | +0 | +3 | 0.0 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 44% | 142 | 127 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 196 | 275 | 361 | 636 | 165 | 272 | 35 | 9 | 284 | 82 | -3 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +3 | 0.0 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 45% | 141 | 126 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 49 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 196 | 275 | 357 | 632 | 162 | 272 | 35 | 9 | 283 | 81 | -3 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +3 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 45% | 141 | 126 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 50 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 193 | 271 | 350 | 622 | 157 | 270 | 35 | 9 | 278 | 78 | -4 | +0 | -1 | +1 | +3 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 709 | 633 | 125 | 25 | 4 | 26 | 66 | 252 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 197 | 278 | 373 | 651 | 175 | 275 | 36 | 9 | 283 | 68 | -16 | +1 | -4 | +3 | +15 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 580 | 115 | 23 | 4 | 24 | 61 | 231 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 198 | 281 | 376 | 656 | 178 | 276 | 36 | 9 | 283 | 68 | -15 | +1 | -3 | +2 | +14 | -0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 4222 | 3794 | 718 | 147 | 18 | 130 | 366 | 1587 | 20 | 36 | 9 | 189 | 264 | 340 | 604 | 151 | 278 | 38 | 9 | 269 | 68 | -46 | +2 | -9 | +7 | +44 | -0.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 111 | 23 | 3 | 20 | 56 | 244 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 190 | 264 | 342 | 606 | 152 | 280 | 38 | 9 | 269 | 68 | -15 | +1 | -3 | +2 | +14 | -0.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAErie SeaWolves · 378 PAwOBA .352 → .284 (−67)K% 34.4% → 42.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.39% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 41.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 9.18% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.53% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 0.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×0.991 | ×1.012 | 19.55% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.860 | ×0.991 | ×1.012 | 5.93% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.950 | ×0.991 | ×1.012 | 1.01% |
| Home runs /BIP | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 8.77% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.991.
Result: wOBA .352 → .284; ISO .251 → .196; BABIP .306 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 425 PAwOBA .382 → .301 (−81)K% 28.9% → 38.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.94% | ÷0.960 | ×1.270 | — | — | 38.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.18% | ÷1.106 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 11.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.47% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 0.37% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.72% | ÷1.027 | ×0.920 | ×0.960 | ×0.998 | 16.92% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.47% | ÷0.948 | ×0.810 | ×0.960 | ×0.998 | 9.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.38% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×0.960 | ×0.998 | 1.25% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.80% | ÷0.850 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 7.33% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 105, 2B 90, 3B 80, K 92, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.960.
Result: wOBA .382 → .301; ISO .240 → .212; BABIP .343 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 280 PAwOBA .282 → .212 (−70)K% 34.3% → 45.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.29% | ÷0.957 | ×1.270 | — | — | 45.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.86% | ÷1.026 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 5.50% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.71% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.57% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.42% | ÷1.021 | ×0.920 | ×0.965 | ×1.012 | 20.61% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.96% | ÷0.892 | ×0.810 | ×0.965 | ×1.012 | 6.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.63% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×0.965 | ×1.012 | 0.58% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.43% | ÷0.889 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 4.04% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 104, 2B 78, 3B 80, K 91, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.
Result: wOBA .282 → .212; ISO .134 → .104; BABIP .320 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 50 PAwOBA .322 → .232 (−90)K% 30.0% → 39.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.00% | ÷1.028 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.00% | ÷1.061 | ×0.690 | — | — | 11.70% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.92% | ÷0.980 | ×0.920 | — | — | 25.28% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.54% | ÷1.351 | ×0.830 | — | — | 7.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.106 | ×0.910 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.099 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 120, 1B 96, 2B 170, 3B 121, K 106, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .322 → .232; ISO .073 → .042; BABIP .385 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 508 PAwOBA .281 → .222 (−59)K% 31.5% → 39.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.50% | ÷1.007 | ×1.270 | — | — | 39.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.25% | ÷0.993 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.027 | 6.80% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.20% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.027 | 0.16% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷0.989 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.027 | 18.15% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.46% | ÷0.985 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×1.027 | 5.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.02% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×0.950 | ×1.027 | 0.73% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.07% | ÷0.882 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 3.79% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 98, 2B 97, 3B 130, K 101, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .281 → .222; ISO .141 → .112; BABIP .292 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 371 PAwOBA .330 → .256 (−74)K% 21.6% → 29.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.56% | ÷0.982 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.70% | ÷0.998 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 6.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.27% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.22% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.80% | ÷1.009 | ×0.920 | ×0.968 | ×1.030 | 20.75% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.40% | ÷0.974 | ×0.830 | ×0.968 | ×1.030 | 7.14% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.80% | ÷1.039 | ×0.910 | ×0.968 | ×1.030 | 0.70% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.20% | ÷1.279 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 2.06% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 156, 1B 102, 2B 95, 3B 108, K 96, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.968.
Result: wOBA .330 → .256; ISO .148 → .104; BABIP .328 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 73 PAwOBA .290 → .259 (−30)K% 23.3% → 30.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.29% | ÷0.956 | ×1.270 | — | — | 30.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.33% | ÷1.024 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.042 | 8.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.95% | ÷1.031 | ×0.920 | ×0.986 | ×1.042 | 12.80% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.65% | ÷0.876 | ×0.810 | ×0.986 | ×1.042 | 4.42% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×0.986 | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.98% | ÷0.847 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.042 | 6.86% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 69, 1B 106, 2B 75, 3B 130, K 91, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.
Result: wOBA .290 → .259; ISO .183 → .183; BABIP .182 → .168. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Tigers West · 125 PAwOBA .300 → .188 (−112)K% 34.4% → 49.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.40% | ÷1.010 | ×1.440 | — | — | 49.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.40% | ÷1.066 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 8.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.98% | ÷0.984 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 21.52% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.35% | ÷1.027 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 4.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.17% | ÷0.949 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 2.31% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.59% | ÷0.906 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 1.38% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 81, 1B 97, 2B 105, 3B 90, K 102, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .300 → .188; ISO .104 → .065; BABIP .371 → .285. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).