Ben Joyce
P Los Angeles Angels| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 49 | 1 | 54 | 2.85 | 2.73 | 30.3% | 11.3% | 1.2 | K 27.4% · BB 11.8% · FIP 3.14 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLBLAA | 5 | 0 | 4 | 6.23 | 6.33 | 5.0% | 5.0% | -0.1 | |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX4 levels | 28 | 0 | 26 | 4.50 | 3.14 | 26.1% | 13.9% | 0.4 | K 29.5% · BB 13.1% · FIP 3.15 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBLAA | 49 | 0 | 51 | 3.83 | 3.81 | 32.2% | 12.5% | 0.5 | |
| 2028PROJ86% MLB | 27 | MLBLAA | 47 | 0 | 49 | 3.90 | 3.90 | 31.3% | 12.2% | 0.4 | |
| 2029PROJ90% MLB | 28 | MLBLAA | 45 | 0 | 47 | 3.98 | 4.02 | 30.6% | 12.2% | 0.3 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | AA MLE | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 13 | 0 | 13 | 57 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 28.4% | 7.7% | 20.7% | 0.0% | 2.08 | 1.68 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | AA RAW | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 13 | 0 | 13 | 57 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 35.1% | 7.0% | 28.1% | 0.0% | 2.08 | 0.95 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 28 | 0 | 28 | 125 | 36 | 23 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.8% | 20.4% | 7.3% | 1.8% | 4.55 | 4.31 | +0.1 |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 28 | 0 | 28 | 125 | 36 | 23 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 28.8% | 18.4% | 10.4% | 1.6% | 4.55 | 3.93 | +0.2 |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 49 | 1 | 54 | 221 | 67 | 25 | 3 | 2% | 1.1 | 27.4% | 11.8% | 15.6% | 1.6% | 2.85 | 3.14 | +0.9 |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 49 | 1 | 54 | 221 | 67 | 25 | 3 | 2% | 1.1 | 27.4% | 11.8% | 15.6% | 1.6% | 2.85 | 3.14 | +0.9 |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 49 | 1 | 54 | 221 | 67 | 25 | 3 | 2% | 1.1 | 30.3% | 11.3% | 19.0% | 1.4% | 2.85 | 2.73 | +1.2 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Angels | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 5.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 5.0% | 6.23 | 6.06 | -0.1 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Angels | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 5.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 5.0% | 6.23 | 6.06 | -0.1 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Angels | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 5.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 5.0% | 6.23 | 6.33 | -0.1 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 28 | 0 | 26 | 115 | 30 | 16 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 29.5% | 13.1% | 16.4% | 1.6% | 4.50 | 3.15 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 28 | 0 | 26 | 115 | 30 | 16 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 29.5% | 13.1% | 16.4% | 1.6% | 4.50 | 3.15 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 28 | 0 | 26 | 115 | 30 | 16 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 26.1% | 13.9% | 12.2% | 0.9% | 4.50 | 3.14 | +0.4 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 64 | 1 | 64 | 271 | 62 | 32 | 4 | 2% | 1.0 | 22.9% | 11.8% | 11.1% | 1.5% | 3.36 | 3.47 | +0.8 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | LAA | 49 | 0 | 51 | 215 | 69 | 27 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 32.2% | 12.5% | 19.7% | 2.7% | 3.83 | 3.81 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAA | 54 | 0 | 57 | 239 | 75 | 29 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 31.3% | 12.2% | 19.1% | 2.8% | 3.90 | 3.90 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAA | 50 | 0 | 52 | 220 | 67 | 27 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 30.6% | 12.2% | 18.4% | 2.9% | 3.98 | 4.02 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAA | 47 | 0 | 49 | 207 | 65 | 25 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 31.3% | 12.2% | 19.1% | 2.8% | 3.90 | 3.90 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAA | 45 | 0 | 47 | 198 | 61 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 30.6% | 12.2% | 18.4% | 2.9% | 3.98 | 4.02 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 155 | 1 | 160 | 674 | 187 | 81 | 15 | 1% | 1.0 | 27.7% | 12.0% | 15.7% | 2.3% | 3.70 | 3.54 | +1.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 194 | 1 | 200 | 844 | 234 | 101 | 19 | 1% | 1.0 | 27.7% | 12.0% | 15.7% | 2.3% | 3.70 | 3.54 | +2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 123 | 1 | 125 | 538 | 146 | 72 | 8 | 1% | 1.0 | 27.2% | 13.4% | 13.8% | 1.6% | 3.61 | 3.37 | +1.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 197 | 2 | 200 | 863 | 235 | 116 | 14 | 1% | 1.0 | 27.2% | 13.4% | 13.8% | 1.6% | 3.61 | 3.37 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 4 IPFIP 2.90 → 3.75 (+0.85)K% 23.8% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.81% | — | ×0.740 | 17.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.29% | — | ×1.180 | 16.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.90 → 3.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 19 IPFIP 2.62 → 3.81 (+1.19)K% 43.0% → 34.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 43.04% | — | ×0.810 | 34.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.92% | — | ×1.100 | 15.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷0.976 | ×1.200 | 3.11% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 2.62 → 3.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 16 IPFIP 3.34 → 4.31 (+0.97)K% 34.3% → 27.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.29% | — | ×0.810 | 27.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.57% | — | ×1.100 | 20.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.43% | ÷0.970 | ×1.200 | 1.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 3.34 → 4.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 13 IPFIP 1.03 → 1.68 (+0.65)K% 35.1% → 28.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.09% | — | ×0.810 | 28.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.02% | — | ×1.100 | 7.72% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.131 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 1.03 → 1.68, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.2 | 59 | 29.1% | 12.3% | 0.94 | 3.75 |
| Antonio Bastardo ('17) | 2.0 | 56 | 28.0% | 11.4% | 1.01 | 4.01 |
| Chad Fox ('09) | 1.1 | 57 | 25.8% | 13.2% | 0.87 | 3.79 |
| Kyle Barraclough ('23) | 1.4 | 56 | 28.2% | 13.9% | 0.99 | 3.86 |
| Rod Scurry ('80-'88, 5 WAR*) | 2.3 | 58 | 29.6%* | 13.6%* | 0.91* | 3.67* |
| Alberto Reyes ('95-'08, 5 WAR*) | 2.1 | 54 | 27.1%* | 10.2%* | 1.18* | 3.66* |
| Mac Scarce ('72-'78, 1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 52 | 25.9%* | 12.4%* | 1.27* | 4.17* |