Keiver De Horta

P DSL Athletics

Age 20 LHP ROK

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2026	19	ROKOAK	17	22	2.49	2.82	30.9%	18.6%	—	K 21.0% · BB 23.2% · FIP 4.26
2027PROJ	20	MLBOAK	12	13	5.52	5.52	22.7%	18.6%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	21	MLBOAK	10	10	5.22	5.10	23.2%	15.8%	-0.1

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 98%

CompsCD Pelham (age 20) · Brendan Nail (age 23) · Peter Bonilla (age 19)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 122130vR 138

ERA5.52

FIP5.52

K%22.7%

BB%18.6%

K-BB%4.1%

Proj IP13

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 13 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2026	19	ROK MLE	DSL Athletics	17	0	22	97	30	18	0	0%	1.3	21.0%	23.2%	-2.2%	0.0%	2.49	4.26	—
2026	19	ROK MLE	DSL Athletics	17	0	22	97	30	18	0	0%	1.3	21.0%	23.2%	-2.2%	0.0%	2.49	4.26	—
2026	19	ROK RAW	DSL Athletics	17	0	22	97	30	18	0	0%	1.3	30.9%	18.6%	12.4%	0.0%	2.49	2.82	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	20	MLB	OAK	12	0	13	55	12	10	2	0%	1.1	22.7%	18.6%	4.1%	2.9%	5.52	5.52	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	21	MLB MLE	OAK	20	0	20	87	20	14	2	0%	1.0	23.2%	15.8%	7.4%	2.9%	5.22	5.10	-0.1
2028	21	MLB CTX	OAK	10	0	10	42	10	7	1	0%	1.0	23.2%	15.8%	7.4%	2.9%	5.22	5.10	-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		10	0	10	43	10	7	1	0%	1.0	23.2%	15.8%	7.4%	2.9%	5.22	4.72	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	198	139	20	0%	1.1	23.2%	15.8%	7.4%	2.9%	5.22	4.72	-0.4
Career	—	MLE		17	0	22	97	20	22	0	0%	1.3	21.0%	23.2%	-2.2%	0.0%	2.49	4.26	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		157	0	200	895	188	208	0	0%	1.3	21.0%	23.2%	-2.2%	0.0%	2.49	4.26	-1.3

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Keiver De Horta (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.52	22.7%	18.6%	2.9%	—	5.10	23.2%	7.4%	20	-0.42	—	—	—
CD Pelham L 2015 · 4.77 FIP	20	SU	4.77	18.8%	18.7%	1.6%	.286	4.00	20.4%	7.8%	109	-0.77	3.39	288	85
Brendan Nail L 2019 · 4.88 FIP	23	SU	4.88	23.8%	16.4%	3.1%	.305	3.83	26.2%	15.2%	87	-1.05	3.45	165	83
Peter Bonilla L 2024 · 4.63 FIP	19	SU	4.63	20.9%	18.3%	1.8%	.250	6.24	19.5%	-5.4%	51	+1.61	4.27	134	82
Jeff Belge L 2021 · 4.91 FIP	23	SU	4.91	24.0%	18.8%	2.7%	.343	3.68	24.2%	10.4%	131	-1.23	3.30	175	82
Nicolo Pinazzi L 2021 · 4.55 FIP	21	SU	4.55	25.7%	21.3%	1.7%	.389	5.41	22.7%	0.2%	76	+0.86	2.58	155	82
Daniel Juarez L 2021 · 4.75 FIP	20	SU	4.75	25.6%	19.2%	2.5%	.170	4.09	21.8%	9.3%	131	-0.66	3.68	221	80
Luis Flores L 2024 · 6.27 FIP	20	SU	6.27	26.2%	26.3%	3.7%	.395	5.39	20.7%	-3.6%	82	-0.88	4.25	130	79
Jonas Uzcategui L 2024 · 4.53 FIP	19	SU	4.53	23.7%	23.3%	0.9%	.231	4.54	22.5%	4.8%	59	+0.01	4.53	104	78
Carlos Rey L 2024 · 4.47 FIP	22	SU	4.47	26.1%	22.0%	1.4%	.297	4.30	25.5%	5.4%	108	-0.17	3.90	165	78
Joseph Menefee L 2023 · 4.50 FIP	23	SU	4.50	21.9%	18.5%	1.7%	.361	4.71	24.8%	6.0%	99	+0.21	3.22	146	78
Julian Bosnic L 2023 · 5.72 FIP	23	SU	5.72	22.5%	21.0%	3.4%	.206	4.74	19.1%	-0.1%	90	-0.98	4.31	136	78
Austin Hamilton L 2017 · 4.92 FIP	23	SU	4.92	17.0%	15.6%	2.3%	.329	4.20	16.3%	8.9%	109	-0.72	4.02	135	77
Luis Colmenares L 2018 · 4.38 FIP	20	SU	4.38	21.5%	20.8%	0.8%	.233	—	—	—	—	—	4.26	132	77
Gregori Louis L 2023 · 6.48 FIP	20	SU	6.48	17.3%	20.4%	4.1%	.241	4.37	19.6%	2.9%	111	-2.11	3.58	149	77
Enrique Perez L 2018 · 4.81 FIP	20	SU	4.81	16.2%	14.3%	2.3%	.286	—	—	—	—	—	3.76	133	77
Boone Logan L 2006 · 4.69 FIP	21	SU	4.69	16.1%	14.0%	2.1%	.302	4.14	17.2%	10.5%	110	-0.55	2.58	442	77
Yenfri Sosa L 2024 · 6.08 FIP	20	SU	6.08	19.0%	21.3%	3.4%	.309	4.41	21.7%	7.4%	38	-1.67	2.49	128	76
Brendan Cellucci L 2021 · 4.57 FIP	23	SU	4.57	26.3%	18.6%	2.4%	.398	4.63	23.4%	6.9%	172	+0.06	3.98	288	76
Tim Collins L 2011 · 4.36 FIP	21	SU	4.36	20.3%	15.6%	1.8%	.255	3.47	25.9%	15.6%	144	-0.89	3.16	297	76
Christian Chamberlain L 2022 · 6.42 FIP	23	SU	6.42	23.4%	21.7%	4.6%	.330	4.12	24.1%	5.4%	99	-2.30	3.91	148	76