Carlos Rey
P Amarillo Sod Poodles| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 39 | 0 | 59 | 3.20 | 3.27 | 34.6% | 19.4% | — | K 26.1% · BB 22.0% · FIP 4.47 |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 48 | 0 | 61 | 3.82 | 2.92 | 28.8% | 14.7% | — | K 22.2% · BB 18.8% · FIP 3.90 |
| 2026 | 24 | AAARI | 51 | 0 | 55 | 3.79 | 3.70 | 35.5% | 19.4% | — | K 28.7% · BB 21.3% · FIP 4.70 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBARI | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.21 | 5.21 | 26.8% | 20.0% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 26 | MLBARI | 22 | 0 | 23 | 5.11 | 5.10 | 26.7% | 18.9% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 27 | MLBARI | 28 | 0 | 29 | 5.07 | 5.08 | 26.4% | 18.2% | -0.2 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs Red | 7 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 24.1% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 3.86 | 4.41 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL D-backs Red | 7 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 24.1% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 3.86 | 4.39 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 59 | 263 | 91 | 51 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 26.1% | 22.0% | 4.1% | 1.4% | 3.20 | 4.47 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 59 | 263 | 91 | 51 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 26.1% | 22.0% | 4.1% | 1.4% | 3.20 | 4.47 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 59 | 263 | 91 | 51 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 34.6% | 19.4% | 15.2% | 1.1% | 3.20 | 3.27 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 48 | 0 | 61 | 278 | 80 | 41 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 22.2% | 18.8% | 3.5% | 0.5% | 3.82 | 3.90 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 48 | 0 | 61 | 278 | 80 | 41 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 22.2% | 18.8% | 3.5% | 0.5% | 3.82 | 3.90 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 48 | 0 | 61 | 278 | 80 | 41 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 28.8% | 14.7% | 14.0% | 0.7% | 3.82 | 2.92 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Amarillo Sod Poodles | 51 | 0 | 55 | 248 | 88 | 48 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.7% | 21.3% | 7.5% | 2.4% | 3.79 | 4.70 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Amarillo Sod Poodles | 51 | 0 | 55 | 248 | 88 | 48 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.7% | 21.3% | 7.5% | 2.4% | 3.79 | 4.70 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA RAW | Amarillo Sod Poodles | 51 | 0 | 55 | 248 | 88 | 48 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 35.5% | 19.4% | 16.1% | 2.0% | 3.79 | 3.70 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | ARI | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.8% | 20.0% | 6.8% | 2.7% | 5.21 | 5.21 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | ARI | 50 | 0 | 53 | 223 | 60 | 42 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.7% | 18.9% | 7.8% | 2.7% | 5.11 | 5.10 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | ARI | 44 | 0 | 46 | 195 | 51 | 35 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.4% | 18.2% | 8.2% | 2.8% | 5.07 | 5.08 | -0.3 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | ARI | 40 | 0 | 42 | 179 | 47 | 32 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.2% | 17.9% | 8.2% | 2.9% | 5.09 | 5.13 | -0.3 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | ARI | 37 | 0 | 39 | 164 | 42 | 29 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.9% | 17.9% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 5.17 | 5.24 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | ARI | 22 | 0 | 23 | 97 | 26 | 18 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.7% | 18.9% | 7.8% | 2.7% | 5.11 | 5.10 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | ARI | 28 | 0 | 29 | 122 | 32 | 22 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.4% | 18.2% | 8.2% | 2.8% | 5.07 | 5.08 | -0.2 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | ARI | 30 | 0 | 32 | 135 | 35 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.2% | 17.9% | 8.2% | 2.9% | 5.09 | 5.13 | -0.2 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | ARI | 30 | 0 | 32 | 135 | 35 | 24 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.9% | 17.9% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 5.17 | 5.24 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 111 | 0 | 116 | 490 | 129 | 89 | 14 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.3% | 18.2% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 5.11 | 4.76 | -0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 222 | 153 | 24 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.3% | 18.2% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 5.11 | 4.76 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 145 | 0 | 182 | 818 | 208 | 170 | 11 | 0% | 1.3 | 25.4% | 20.8% | 4.6% | 1.4% | 3.61 | 4.34 | -1.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 159 | 0 | 200 | 899 | 228 | 187 | 12 | 0% | 1.3 | 25.4% | 20.8% | 4.6% | 1.4% | 3.61 | 4.34 | -1.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 55 IPFIP 3.66 → 4.70 (+1.04)K% 35.5% → 28.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.48% | — | ×0.810 | 28.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.35% | — | ×1.100 | 21.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.02% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 2.42% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.66 → 4.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Hillsboro Hops · 53 IPFIP 2.96 → 3.90 (+0.94)K% 28.9% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.87% | — | ×0.770 | 22.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.32% | — | ×1.150 | 18.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.42% | ÷0.968 | ×1.250 | 0.54% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 2.96 → 3.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 8 IPFIP 2.78 → 3.15 (+0.38)K% 28.2% → 22.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.21% | — | ×0.810 | 22.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.13% | — | ×1.100 | 5.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷1.333 | ×1.200 | 2.31% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 167).
Result: FIP 2.78 → 3.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AVisalia Rawhide · 57 IPFIP 3.15 → 4.47 (+1.32)K% 35.2% → 26.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.22% | — | ×0.740 | 26.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.62% | — | ×1.180 | 21.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.21% | ÷1.102 | ×1.300 | 1.43% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 3.15 → 4.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL D-backs Red · 7 IPFIP 4.41 → 5.73 (+1.32)K% 20.7% → 14.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.69% | — | ×0.680 | 14.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 24.14% | — | ×1.250 | 30.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.918 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 4.41 → 5.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.3 | 50 | 26.5% | 18.8% | 1.08 | 5.14 |
| Brian Bruney ('12) | 1.3 | 43 | 21.2% | 15.8% | 0.94 | 4.68 |
| Dwayne Henry ('84-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.7 | 67 | 23.8%* | 14.2%* | 0.90* | 5.02* |
| Derrick Turnbow ('08) | 1.3 | 64 | 23.4% | 14.8% | 0.87 | 4.30 |
| Armando Almanza ('05) | 1.1 | 54 | 24.4% | 14.3% | 1.43 | 4.82 |
| Ed Glynn ('75-'85, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 53 | 23.5%* | 12.9%* | 1.22* | 4.69* |
| Ken Wright ('70-'74, -0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 79 | 23.8%* | 16.1%* | 0.70* | 5.24* |