Chris Wright
P Richmond Flying Squirrels| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 23 | AASF | 41 | 0 | 56 | 3.86 | 3.42 | 31.1% | 14.3% | — | K 25.2% · BB 15.8% · FIP 4.42 | |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 42 | 1 | 50 | 4.89 | 4.49 | 29.6% | 18.5% | — | K 24.4% · BB 17.3% · FIP 4.73 | |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX3 levels | 24 | 2 | 26 | 5.96 | 4.54 | 27.2% | 17.5% | — | K 20.0% · BB 19.1% · FIP 4.65 | |
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBSF | — | — | 0 | 4.92 | 4.92 | 22.1% | 13.4% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBSF | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4.94 | 4.99 | 22.0% | 13.2% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 20 | ROK MLE | AZL Giants Black | 8 | 5 | 13 | 60 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 62% | 1.7 | 9.1% | 16.7% | -7.6% | 0.0% | 2.02 | 4.45 | — |
| 2019 | 20 | ROK RAW | AZL Giants Black | 8 | 5 | 13 | 60 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 62% | 1.7 | 13.3% | 13.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.02 | 3.70 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 37 | 0 | 45 | 173 | 79 | 21 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 33.6% | 14.6% | 19.0% | 1.7% | 1.00 | 3.03 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 37 | 0 | 45 | 173 | 79 | 21 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 45.7% | 12.1% | 33.5% | 1.2% | 1.00 | 1.57 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | 41 | 0 | 56 | 244 | 76 | 35 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 25.2% | 15.8% | 9.5% | 2.6% | 3.86 | 4.42 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA RAW | Richmond Flying Squirrels | 41 | 0 | 56 | 244 | 76 | 35 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 31.1% | 14.3% | 16.8% | 2.0% | 3.86 | 3.42 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 1 | 50 | 243 | 72 | 45 | 6 | 2% | 1.2 | 24.4% | 17.3% | 7.1% | 2.7% | 4.89 | 4.73 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 1 | 50 | 243 | 72 | 45 | 6 | 2% | 1.2 | 29.6% | 18.5% | 11.1% | 2.5% | 4.89 | 4.49 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 2 | 26 | 114 | 31 | 20 | 3 | 8% | 1.1 | 20.0% | 19.1% | 0.8% | 1.5% | 5.96 | 4.65 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 2 | 26 | 114 | 31 | 20 | 3 | 8% | 1.1 | 20.0% | 19.1% | 0.8% | 1.5% | 5.96 | 4.65 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 24 | 2 | 26 | 114 | 31 | 20 | 3 | 8% | 1.1 | 27.2% | 17.5% | 9.6% | 2.6% | 5.96 | 4.54 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | SF | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | 13.4% | 8.7% | 2.9% | 4.92 | 4.92 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | SF | 16 | 0 | 16 | 70 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.0% | 13.2% | 8.8% | 3.1% | 4.94 | 4.99 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | SF | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.0% | 13.2% | 8.8% | 3.1% | 4.94 | 4.99 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.0% | 13.2% | 8.8% | 3.1% | 4.94 | 4.61 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 194 | 116 | 39 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.0% | 13.2% | 8.8% | 3.1% | 4.94 | 4.61 | -0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 152 | 8 | 190 | 834 | 207 | 138 | 18 | 5% | 1.2 | 24.8% | 16.5% | 8.4% | 2.1% | 3.61 | 4.25 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 160 | 8 | 200 | 879 | 219 | 145 | 19 | 5% | 1.2 | 24.8% | 16.5% | 8.4% | 2.1% | 3.61 | 4.25 | -1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 17 IPFIP 4.02 → 4.65 (+0.63)K% 24.6% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.64% | — | ×0.810 | 19.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.39% | — | ×1.100 | 19.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.45% | ÷1.183 | ×1.200 | 1.47% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 4.02 → 4.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Giants · 6 IPFIP 1.69 → 3.11 (+1.41)K% 36.7% → 24.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.67% | — | ×0.680 | 24.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.33% | — | ×1.250 | 16.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.128 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 1.69 → 3.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAASacramento River Cats · 46 IPFIP 4.58 → 4.73 (+0.15)K% 28.4% → 24.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.38% | — | ×0.860 | 24.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.21% | — | ×0.900 | 17.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.62% | ÷1.057 | ×1.100 | 2.73% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 4.58 → 4.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 56 IPFIP 3.41 → 4.42 (+1.01)K% 31.1% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.15% | — | ×0.810 | 25.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.34% | — | ×1.100 | 15.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.05% | ÷0.929 | ×1.200 | 2.65% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 3.41 → 4.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Eugene Emeralds · 37 IPFIP 1.79 → 3.03 (+1.24)K% 43.7% → 33.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 43.66% | — | ×0.770 | 33.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.68% | — | ×1.150 | 14.58% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.41% | ÷1.049 | ×1.250 | 1.68% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 1.79 → 3.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ASan Jose Giants · 8 IPFIP -0.31 → 1.12 (+1.42)K% 54.8% → 40.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 54.84% | — | ×0.740 | 40.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×1.180 | 11.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.008 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP -0.31 → 1.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKAZL Giants Black · 13 IPFIP 3.66 → 4.45 (+0.78)K% 13.3% → 9.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.33% | — | ×0.680 | 9.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.33% | — | ×1.250 | 16.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.66 → 4.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).