Yenfri Sosa
P Jupiter Hammerheads| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | ROKKC | 12 | 0 | 28 | 4.88 | 4.29 | 27.9% | 17.1% | — | K 19.0% · BB 21.3% · FIP 6.08 |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 22 | 0 | 38 | 3.99 | 3.05 | 30.6% | 11.9% | — | K 21.7% · BB 14.3% · FIP 4.41 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 11 | 0 | 17 | 5.94 | 6.46 | 23.5% | 17.3% | — | K 23.5% · BB 17.3% · FIP 6.02 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBMIA | — | — | 0 | 4.94 | 4.94 | 22.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBMIA | 11 | 0 | 12 | 4.76 | 4.68 | 23.2% | 12.2% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Royals White | 6 | 0 | 13 | 51 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 2.2 | 12.0% | 4.9% | 7.1% | 0.0% | 2.02 | 2.71 | — |
| 2021 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Royals White | 6 | 0 | 13 | 51 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 2.2 | 17.6% | 3.9% | 13.7% | 0.0% | 2.02 | 2.20 | — |
| 2022 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL KC Glass | 12 | 0 | 23 | 105 | 27 | 12 | 1 | 0% | 1.9 | 17.5% | 14.3% | 3.2% | 1.5% | 3.91 | 4.27 | — |
| 2022 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL KC Glass | 12 | 0 | 23 | 105 | 27 | 12 | 1 | 0% | 1.9 | 25.7% | 11.4% | 14.3% | 1.0% | 3.91 | 2.88 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Royals Blue | 15 | 0 | 25 | 101 | 41 | 11 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 27.6% | 13.6% | 14.0% | 0.0% | 0.71 | 2.49 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Royals Blue | 15 | 0 | 25 | 101 | 41 | 11 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 40.6% | 10.9% | 29.7% | 0.0% | 0.71 | 1.17 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | ACL Royals | 12 | 0 | 28 | 129 | 36 | 22 | 3 | 0% | 2.3 | 19.0% | 21.3% | -2.3% | 3.4% | 4.88 | 6.08 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK MLE | ACL Royals | 12 | 0 | 28 | 129 | 36 | 22 | 3 | 0% | 2.3 | 19.0% | 21.3% | -2.3% | 3.4% | 4.88 | 6.08 | — |
| 2024 | 20 | ROK RAW | ACL Royals | 12 | 0 | 28 | 129 | 36 | 22 | 3 | 0% | 2.3 | 27.9% | 17.1% | 10.9% | 2.3% | 4.88 | 4.29 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 0 | 38 | 160 | 49 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 21.7% | 14.3% | 7.4% | 2.4% | 3.99 | 4.41 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 0 | 38 | 160 | 49 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 21.7% | 14.3% | 7.4% | 2.4% | 3.99 | 4.41 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 0 | 38 | 160 | 49 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 30.6% | 11.9% | 18.8% | 1.9% | 3.99 | 3.05 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 11 | 0 | 17 | 81 | 19 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.5 | 23.5% | 17.3% | 6.2% | 4.9% | 5.94 | 6.02 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 11 | 0 | 17 | 81 | 19 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.5 | 23.5% | 17.3% | 6.2% | 4.9% | 5.94 | 6.02 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 11 | 0 | 17 | 81 | 19 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.5 | 23.5% | 17.3% | 6.2% | 4.9% | 5.94 | 6.46 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | MIA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.6% | 13.7% | 9.0% | 3.0% | 4.94 | 4.94 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | MIA | 26 | 0 | 28 | 117 | 27 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 3.0% | 4.76 | 4.68 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | MIA | 11 | 0 | 12 | 51 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 3.0% | 4.76 | 4.68 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 11 | 0 | 12 | 50 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 3.0% | 4.76 | 4.30 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 203 | 101 | 17 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 3.0% | 4.76 | 4.30 | +0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 78 | 0 | 144 | 627 | 131 | 96 | 14 | 0% | 1.9 | 20.8% | 15.2% | 5.6% | 2.2% | 3.62 | 4.49 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 108 | 0 | 200 | 869 | 181 | 132 | 19 | 0% | 1.9 | 20.8% | 15.2% | 5.6% | 2.2% | 3.62 | 4.49 | -0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AJupiter Hammerheads · 8 IPFIP 8.66 → 11.30 (+2.64)K% 26.8% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.83% | — | ×0.740 | 19.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.51% | — | ×1.180 | 23.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 9.76% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 12.68% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 8.66 → 11.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Marlins · 9 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.33 (+1.02)K% 20.0% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.680 | 13.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.00% | — | ×1.250 | 18.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Royals · 19 IPFIP 2.01 → 3.44 (+1.43)K% 32.1% → 21.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.10% | — | ×0.680 | 21.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.41% | — | ×1.250 | 9.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.23% | ÷0.939 | ×1.400 | 1.84% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 2.01 → 3.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AColumbia Fireflies · 19 IPFIP 4.12 → 5.40 (+1.29)K% 29.1% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.11% | — | ×0.740 | 21.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.46% | — | ×1.180 | 19.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷1.086 | ×1.300 | 3.03% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 4.12 → 5.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Royals · 28 IPFIP 4.18 → 6.08 (+1.90)K% 27.9% → 19.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.91% | — | ×0.680 | 18.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.05% | — | ×1.250 | 21.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.33% | ÷0.949 | ×1.400 | 3.43% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 4.18 → 6.08, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Royals Blue · 25 IPFIP 1.05 → 2.49 (+1.44)K% 40.6% → 27.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.59% | — | ×0.680 | 27.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.89% | — | ×1.250 | 13.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.903 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 1.05 → 2.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL KC Glass · 23 IPFIP 2.90 → 4.27 (+1.37)K% 25.7% → 17.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.71% | — | ×0.680 | 17.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.43% | — | ×1.250 | 14.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.95% | ÷0.879 | ×1.400 | 1.52% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 2.90 → 4.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Royals White · 13 IPFIP 2.11 → 2.71 (+0.60)K% 17.6% → 12.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.65% | — | ×0.680 | 12.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.92% | — | ×1.250 | 4.90% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.11 → 2.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).