Seth Clark
P Hub City Spartanburgers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 42 | 0 | 52 | 4.13 | 4.88 | 24.1% | 14.5% | — | K 18.9% · BB 16.2% · FIP 5.66 |
| 2025 | 25 | A+TEX | 28 | 0 | 32 | 6.25 | 3.86 | 23.0% | 17.8% | — | K 17.7% · BB 20.4% · FIP 4.56 |
| 2026 | 26 | A+TEX | 7 | 0 | 5 | 18.00 | 14.50 | 20.6% | 44.1% | — | K 20.6% · BB 44.1% · FIP 10.18 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBTEX | — | — | 0 | 5.41 | 5.41 | 20.2% | 16.1% | — | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 28 | MLBTEX | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5.35 | 5.38 | 20.4% | 15.6% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Rangers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 66.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -2.53 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK RAW | ACL Rangers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 66.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -0.90 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 37 | 1 | 54 | 223 | 65 | 28 | 3 | 3% | 1.5 | 22.5% | 15.0% | 7.5% | 2.1% | 2.15 | 4.23 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 37 | 1 | 54 | 223 | 65 | 28 | 3 | 3% | 1.5 | 29.1% | 12.6% | 16.6% | 1.3% | 2.15 | 2.97 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 52 | 241 | 58 | 35 | 8 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.9% | 16.2% | 2.7% | 3.8% | 4.13 | 5.66 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 52 | 241 | 58 | 35 | 8 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.9% | 16.2% | 2.7% | 3.8% | 4.13 | 5.66 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 52 | 241 | 58 | 35 | 8 | 0% | 1.2 | 24.1% | 14.5% | 9.5% | 3.3% | 4.13 | 4.88 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | A+ MLE | Hub City Spartanburgers | 28 | 0 | 32 | 152 | 35 | 27 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.7% | 20.4% | -2.7% | 0.7% | 6.25 | 4.56 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | A+ MLE | Hub City Spartanburgers | 28 | 0 | 32 | 152 | 35 | 27 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.7% | 20.4% | -2.7% | 0.7% | 6.25 | 4.56 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | A+ RAW | Hub City Spartanburgers | 28 | 0 | 32 | 152 | 35 | 27 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 17.8% | 5.3% | 0.7% | 6.25 | 3.86 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | A+ MLE | Hub City Spartanburgers | 7 | 0 | 5 | 34 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 0% | 0.7 | 20.6% | 44.1% | -23.5% | 5.9% | 18.00 | 10.18 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | A+ MLE | Hub City Spartanburgers | 7 | 0 | 5 | 34 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 0% | 0.7 | 20.6% | 44.1% | -23.5% | 5.9% | 18.00 | 10.18 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | A+ RAW | Hub City Spartanburgers | 7 | 0 | 5 | 34 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 0% | 0.7 | 20.6% | 44.1% | -23.5% | 5.9% | 18.00 | 14.50 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | TEX | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | 16.1% | 4.1% | 2.9% | 5.41 | 5.41 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | TEX | 15 | 0 | 16 | 67 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.4% | 15.6% | 4.8% | 3.0% | 5.35 | 5.38 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | TEX | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.4% | 15.6% | 4.8% | 3.0% | 5.35 | 5.38 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.4% | 15.6% | 4.8% | 3.0% | 5.35 | 5.00 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 173 | 138 | 35 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.4% | 15.6% | 4.8% | 3.0% | 5.35 | 5.00 | -1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 115 | 1 | 144 | 653 | 132 | 118 | 17 | 1% | 1.3 | 20.2% | 18.1% | 2.0% | 2.6% | 4.30 | 5.12 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 159 | 1 | 200 | 905 | 182 | 164 | 23 | 1% | 1.3 | 20.2% | 18.1% | 2.0% | 2.6% | 4.30 | 5.12 | -1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Hub City Spartanburgers · 5 IPFIP 10.18 → 12.22 (+2.05)K% 20.6% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.59% | — | ×0.770 | 15.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 44.12% | — | ×1.150 | 50.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.88% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 7.35% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 10.18 → 12.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Hub City Spartanburgers · 32 IPFIP 3.77 → 4.56 (+0.80)K% 23.0% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.03% | — | ×0.770 | 17.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.76% | — | ×1.150 | 20.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.66% | ÷1.215 | ×1.250 | 0.68% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 143).
Result: FIP 3.77 → 4.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 50 IPFIP 4.89 → 5.66 (+0.77)K% 23.4% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.38% | — | ×0.810 | 18.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.72% | — | ×1.100 | 16.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.46% | ÷1.080 | ×1.200 | 3.85% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 4.89 → 5.66, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Hickory Crawdads · 46 IPFIP 3.14 → 4.23 (+1.09)K% 29.2% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.17% | — | ×0.770 | 22.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.02% | — | ×1.150 | 14.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.56% | ÷0.948 | ×1.250 | 2.06% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.14 → 4.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ADown East Wood Ducks · 8 IPFIP 1.87 → 2.73 (+0.86)K% 29.0% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.03% | — | ×0.740 | 21.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×1.180 | 11.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.082 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 1.87 → 2.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).