Juan Fraide
P Fayetteville Woodpeckers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19 | ROKHOU | 9 | 5 | 30 | 3.00 | 2.43 | 21.6% | 8.6% | — | K 14.7% · BB 10.8% · FIP 3.23 |
| 2026 | 20 | MIX2 levels | 18 | 13 | 79 | 2.96 | 2.97 | 28.1% | 8.3% | — | K 20.4% · BB 9.9% · FIP 4.21 |
| 2027PROJ | 21 | MLBHOU | — | — | 0 | 4.63 | 4.63 | 20.2% | 9.9% | — | |
| 2028PROJ35% MLB | 22 | MLBHOU | 4 | 4 | 22 | 4.44 | 4.36 | 21.5% | 9.2% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ57% MLB | 23 | MLBHOU | 6 | 6 | 36 | 4.30 | 4.22 | 22.4% | 8.8% | 0.5 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Astros | 9 | 5 | 30 | 116 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 56% | 3.3 | 14.7% | 10.8% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 3.00 | 3.23 | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Astros | 9 | 5 | 30 | 116 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 56% | 3.3 | 14.7% | 10.8% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 3.00 | 3.23 | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Astros | 9 | 5 | 30 | 116 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 56% | 3.3 | 21.6% | 8.6% | 12.9% | 0.0% | 3.00 | 2.43 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 13 | 79 | 324 | 91 | 27 | 7 | 72% | 4.4 | 20.4% | 9.9% | 10.5% | 2.9% | 2.96 | 4.21 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 13 | 79 | 324 | 91 | 27 | 7 | 72% | 4.4 | 20.4% | 9.9% | 10.5% | 2.9% | 2.96 | 4.21 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 18 | 13 | 79 | 324 | 91 | 27 | 7 | 72% | 4.4 | 28.1% | 8.3% | 19.8% | 2.2% | 2.96 | 2.97 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB | HOU | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | 9.9% | 10.3% | 2.9% | 4.63 | 4.63 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | HOU | 10 | 10 | 63 | 267 | 57 | 25 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 21.5% | 9.2% | 12.3% | 2.9% | 4.48 | 4.40 | +0.7 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB MLE | HOU | 10 | 10 | 63 | 267 | 60 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 22.4% | 8.8% | 13.6% | 2.8% | 4.34 | 4.26 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB MLE | HOU | 10 | 10 | 63 | 267 | 61 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 23.0% | 8.5% | 14.5% | 2.8% | 4.23 | 4.16 | +0.9 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB MLE | HOU | 10 | 10 | 60 | 255 | 60 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.4% | 8.4% | 15.0% | 2.8% | 4.16 | 4.11 | +0.9 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB MLE | HOU | 10 | 10 | 61 | 256 | 60 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.6% | 8.4% | 15.2% | 2.8% | 4.12 | 4.09 | +0.9 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB MLE | HOU | 11 | 11 | 65 | 276 | 71 | 21 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 25.6% | 7.6% | 17.9% | 2.8% | 3.96 | 3.85 | +1.2 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB MLE | HOU | 10 | 10 | 62 | 264 | 67 | 21 | 8 | 100% | 6.2 | 25.4% | 7.8% | 17.7% | 2.9% | 3.95 | 3.94 | +1.1 |
| 2035 | 29 | MLB MLE | HOU | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 62 | 20 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.2% | 8.0% | 17.2% | 3.1% | 4.02 | 4.07 | +0.9 |
| 2036 | 30 | MLB MLE | HOU | 9 | 9 | 52 | 220 | 55 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.9% | 8.3% | 16.5% | 3.3% | 4.15 | 4.24 | +0.7 |
| 2037 | 31 | MLB MLE | HOU | 8 | 8 | 46 | 195 | 48 | 17 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.4% | 8.7% | 15.8% | 3.5% | 4.33 | 4.45 | +0.5 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | HOU | 4 | 4 | 22 | 93 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.5% | 9.2% | 12.3% | 2.8% | 4.44 | 4.36 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB CTX | HOU | 6 | 6 | 36 | 152 | 34 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.4% | 8.8% | 13.6% | 2.8% | 4.30 | 4.22 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB CTX | HOU | 7 | 7 | 44 | 186 | 43 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.3 | 23.0% | 8.5% | 14.5% | 2.7% | 4.19 | 4.12 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB CTX | HOU | 8 | 8 | 47 | 198 | 46 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.4% | 8.4% | 15.0% | 2.7% | 4.12 | 4.07 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB CTX | HOU | 8 | 8 | 50 | 211 | 50 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 6.2 | 23.6% | 8.4% | 15.2% | 2.7% | 4.08 | 4.05 | +0.8 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB CTX | HOU | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 60 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 25.6% | 7.6% | 17.9% | 2.8% | 3.92 | 3.81 | +1.0 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB CTX | HOU | 9 | 9 | 55 | 232 | 59 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 25.4% | 7.8% | 17.7% | 2.9% | 3.91 | 3.90 | +1.0 |
| 2035 | 29 | MLB CTX | HOU | 9 | 9 | 52 | 220 | 55 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.2% | 8.0% | 17.2% | 3.0% | 3.97 | 4.02 | +0.8 |
| 2036 | 30 | MLB CTX | HOU | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 50 | 17 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.9% | 8.3% | 16.5% | 3.2% | 4.10 | 4.19 | +0.7 |
| 2037 | 31 | MLB CTX | HOU | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 43 | 15 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.4% | 8.7% | 15.8% | 3.4% | 4.28 | 4.40 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 75 | 75 | 453 | 1914 | 463 | 159 | 56 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.2% | 8.3% | 15.9% | 2.9% | 4.10 | 3.70 | +9.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 204 | 70 | 25 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.2% | 8.3% | 15.9% | 2.9% | 4.10 | 3.70 | +4.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 27 | 18 | 109 | 440 | 83 | 45 | 9 | 67% | 4.0 | 18.9% | 10.1% | 8.7% | 2.1% | 2.97 | 3.95 | +8.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 50 | 33 | 200 | 807 | 152 | 82 | 17 | 67% | 4.0 | 18.9% | 10.1% | 8.7% | 2.1% | 2.97 | 3.95 | +3.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AFayetteville Woodpeckers · 62 IPFIP 3.08 → 4.20 (+1.12)K% 26.7% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.74% | — | ×0.740 | 19.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.30% | — | ×1.180 | 10.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.94% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.52% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.08 → 4.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Astros · 17 IPFIP 2.52 → 4.23 (+1.71)K% 33.3% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.680 | 22.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.55% | — | ×1.250 | 5.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 4.24% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.52 → 4.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Astros · 30 IPFIP 2.37 → 3.23 (+0.86)K% 21.6% → 14.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.55% | — | ×0.680 | 14.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.62% | — | ×1.250 | 10.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.023 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 2.37 → 3.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.2 | 58 | 23.6% | 8.5% | 1.14 | 4.20 |
| David Hernandez ('19) | 3.2 | 65 | 23.9% | 9.1% | 1.22 | 4.12 |
| Tom Niedenfuer ('81-'90, 8 WAR*) | 3.3 | 65 | 23.1%* | 8.1%* | 1.19* | 3.80* |
| Xavier Hernandez ('89-'98, 3 WAR*) | 3.4 | 67 | 23.9%* | 9.1%* | 1.12* | 4.20* |
| Rob Murphy ('85-'95, 6 WAR*) | 3.1 | 69 | 25.2%* | 9.2%* | 1.07* | 3.94* |
| Stan Belinda ('00) | 3.4 | 61 | 21.3% | 9.9% | 1.13 | 4.12 |
| Fernando Salas ('19) | 2.4 | 54 | 23.1% | 7.3% | 1.05 | 3.91 |