Edelvis Perez
P ACL Guardians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20 | ROKDSL CLE Goryl | 12 | 12 | 38 | 5.45 | 4.23 | 24.7% | 17.2% | — | K 16.8% · BB 21.6% · FIP 5.42 |
| 2026 | 21 | ROKCLE | 6 | 5 | 24 | 2.62 | 3.98 | 28.8% | 13.5% | — | K 19.6% · BB 16.8% · FIP 5.79 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBCLE | — | — | 0 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 20.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 23 | MLBCLE | 3 | 3 | 15 | 5.20 | 5.08 | 21.7% | 14.3% | 0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL CLE Mendoza | 11 | 10 | 41 | 172 | 30 | 19 | 3 | 91% | 3.8 | 11.9% | 13.8% | -1.9% | 2.4% | 3.92 | 5.19 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL CLE Mendoza | 11 | 10 | 41 | 172 | 30 | 19 | 3 | 91% | 3.8 | 11.9% | 13.8% | -1.9% | 2.4% | 3.92 | 5.19 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL CLE Mendoza | 11 | 10 | 41 | 172 | 30 | 19 | 3 | 91% | 3.8 | 17.4% | 11.0% | 6.4% | 1.7% | 3.92 | 3.97 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL CLE Goryl | 12 | 12 | 38 | 174 | 43 | 30 | 3 | 100% | 3.2 | 16.8% | 21.6% | -4.7% | 1.8% | 5.45 | 5.42 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL CLE Goryl | 12 | 12 | 38 | 174 | 43 | 30 | 3 | 100% | 3.2 | 16.8% | 21.6% | -4.7% | 1.8% | 5.45 | 5.42 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL CLE Goryl | 12 | 12 | 38 | 174 | 43 | 30 | 3 | 100% | 3.2 | 24.7% | 17.2% | 7.5% | 1.7% | 5.45 | 4.23 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Guardians | 6 | 5 | 24 | 104 | 30 | 14 | 3 | 83% | 4.0 | 19.6% | 16.8% | 2.8% | 4.0% | 2.62 | 5.79 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Guardians | 6 | 5 | 24 | 104 | 30 | 14 | 3 | 83% | 4.0 | 19.6% | 16.8% | 2.8% | 4.0% | 2.62 | 5.79 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Guardians | 6 | 5 | 24 | 104 | 30 | 14 | 3 | 83% | 4.0 | 28.8% | 13.5% | 15.4% | 2.9% | 2.62 | 3.98 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | CLE | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.6% | 16.7% | 4.0% | 3.0% | 5.50 | 5.50 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | CLE | 5 | 5 | 30 | 125 | 27 | 18 | 4 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.7% | 14.3% | 7.4% | 3.0% | 5.20 | 5.08 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | CLE | 3 | 3 | 15 | 63 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 100% | 5.0 | 21.7% | 14.3% | 7.4% | 3.0% | 5.20 | 5.08 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 3 | 3 | 15 | 62 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 100% | 4.9 | 21.7% | 14.3% | 7.4% | 3.0% | 5.20 | 4.70 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 37 | 37 | 200 | 844 | 178 | 123 | 27 | 100% | 5.3 | 21.7% | 14.3% | 7.4% | 3.0% | 5.20 | 4.70 | +1.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 29 | 27 | 103 | 450 | 70 | 79 | 12 | 93% | 3.6 | 15.6% | 17.5% | -1.9% | 2.6% | 4.18 | 5.42 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 56 | 52 | 200 | 871 | 136 | 152 | 22 | 93% | 3.6 | 15.6% | 17.5% | -1.9% | 2.6% | 4.18 | 5.42 | +0.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKACL Guardians · 24 IPFIP 3.95 → 5.79 (+1.84)K% 28.8% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.85% | — | ×0.680 | 19.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.46% | — | ×1.250 | 16.83% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.88% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 4.04% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.95 → 5.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKDSL CLE Goryl · 38 IPFIP 4.14 → 5.42 (+1.27)K% 24.7% → 16.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.71% | — | ×0.680 | 16.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.24% | — | ×1.250 | 21.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷1.316 | ×1.400 | 1.83% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 163).
Result: FIP 4.14 → 5.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKDSL CLE Mendoza · 41 IPFIP 3.98 → 5.19 (+1.20)K% 17.4% → 11.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.44% | — | ×0.680 | 11.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.05% | — | ×1.250 | 13.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.74% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.44% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.98 → 5.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).