Deivi Villafana
P Daytona Tortugas| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | ROKCIN | 5 | 0 | 9 | 4.15 | 1.37 | 24.3% | 2.7% | — | K 24.3% · BB 2.7% · FIP 1.39 |
| 2025 | 22 | ROKCIN | 12 | 8 | 47 | 6.56 | 2.99 | 18.5% | 4.0% | — | K 12.6% · BB 5.0% · FIP 3.75 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 24 | 18 | 99 | 5.80 | 3.65 | 21.3% | 6.6% | — | K 16.0% · BB 7.7% · FIP 4.62 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBCIN | — | — | 0 | 4.66 | 4.66 | 16.8% | 7.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 25 | MLBCIN | 4 | 4 | 23 | 4.69 | 4.65 | 18.4% | 6.9% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ51% MLB | 26 | MLBCIN | 6 | 6 | 37 | 4.61 | 4.57 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 0.4 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | DSL Reds | 5 | 0 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 24.3% | 2.7% | 21.6% | 0.0% | 4.15 | 1.39 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | DSL Reds | 5 | 0 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 24.3% | 2.7% | 21.6% | 0.0% | 4.15 | 1.39 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK RAW | DSL Reds | 5 | 0 | 9 | 37 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 24.3% | 2.7% | 21.6% | 0.0% | 4.15 | 1.37 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Reds | 12 | 8 | 47 | 227 | 42 | 9 | 4 | 67% | 3.9 | 12.6% | 5.0% | 7.6% | 2.0% | 6.56 | 3.75 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Reds | 12 | 8 | 47 | 227 | 42 | 9 | 4 | 67% | 3.9 | 12.6% | 5.0% | 7.6% | 2.0% | 6.56 | 3.75 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | ROK RAW | ACL Reds | 12 | 8 | 47 | 227 | 42 | 9 | 4 | 67% | 3.9 | 18.5% | 4.0% | 14.5% | 1.8% | 6.56 | 2.99 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 18 | 99 | 442 | 94 | 29 | 12 | 75% | 4.1 | 16.0% | 7.7% | 8.3% | 3.5% | 5.80 | 4.62 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 18 | 99 | 442 | 94 | 29 | 12 | 75% | 4.1 | 16.0% | 7.7% | 8.3% | 3.5% | 5.80 | 4.62 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 18 | 99 | 442 | 94 | 29 | 12 | 75% | 4.1 | 21.3% | 6.6% | 14.7% | 2.7% | 5.80 | 3.65 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | CIN | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.8% | 7.0% | 9.8% | 3.1% | 4.66 | 4.66 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | CIN | 13 | 13 | 75 | 316 | 58 | 22 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.4% | 6.9% | 11.4% | 3.1% | 4.55 | 4.51 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | CIN | 12 | 12 | 72 | 302 | 58 | 21 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 12.3% | 3.1% | 4.47 | 4.43 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | CIN | 11 | 11 | 68 | 289 | 56 | 20 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.4% | 7.1% | 12.3% | 3.1% | 4.46 | 4.46 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | CIN | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 53 | 20 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.3% | 7.2% | 12.1% | 3.2% | 4.51 | 4.54 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | CIN | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 48 | 19 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.1% | 7.5% | 11.6% | 3.4% | 4.61 | 4.67 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | CIN | 10 | 10 | 60 | 252 | 52 | 18 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 7.0% | 13.8% | 3.6% | 4.59 | 4.58 | +0.6 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB MLE | CIN | 9 | 9 | 53 | 223 | 45 | 16 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.3% | 7.3% | 13.0% | 3.8% | 4.70 | 4.78 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB MLE | CIN | 8 | 8 | 46 | 193 | 38 | 15 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 19.9% | 7.7% | 12.2% | 4.1% | 4.88 | 5.01 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | CIN | 4 | 4 | 23 | 97 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.4% | 6.9% | 11.4% | 3.3% | 4.69 | 4.65 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | CIN | 6 | 6 | 37 | 156 | 30 | 11 | 5 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 4.61 | 4.57 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | CIN | 7 | 7 | 43 | 182 | 35 | 13 | 6 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.4% | 7.1% | 12.3% | 3.4% | 4.60 | 4.60 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 46 | 194 | 38 | 14 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.3% | 7.2% | 12.1% | 3.5% | 4.65 | 4.68 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 46 | 194 | 37 | 15 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.1% | 7.5% | 11.6% | 3.7% | 4.76 | 4.82 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | CIN | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 42 | 14 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 7.0% | 13.8% | 3.9% | 4.75 | 4.74 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB CTX | CIN | 7 | 7 | 44 | 186 | 38 | 14 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.3% | 7.3% | 13.0% | 4.1% | 4.87 | 4.95 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB CTX | CIN | 7 | 7 | 40 | 169 | 34 | 13 | 7 | 100% | 5.7 | 19.9% | 7.7% | 12.2% | 4.4% | 5.06 | 5.19 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 55 | 55 | 327 | 1381 | 271 | 100 | 51 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.6% | 7.2% | 12.4% | 3.7% | 4.75 | 4.40 | +3.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 166 | 61 | 31 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.6% | 7.2% | 12.4% | 3.7% | 4.75 | 4.40 | +2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 41 | 26 | 155 | 706 | 108 | 46 | 20 | 63% | 3.8 | 15.3% | 6.5% | 8.8% | 2.8% | 5.94 | 4.17 | +4.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 53 | 34 | 200 | 913 | 140 | 60 | 26 | 63% | 3.8 | 15.3% | 6.5% | 8.8% | 2.8% | 5.94 | 4.17 | +1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ADaytona Tortugas · 66 IPFIP 3.25 → 4.15 (+0.90)K% 19.9% → 14.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.93% | — | ×0.740 | 14.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.50% | — | ×1.180 | 6.49% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.06% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.68% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.25 → 4.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Dayton Dragons · 33 IPFIP 4.36 → 5.53 (+1.17)K% 23.8% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.84% | — | ×0.770 | 18.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.61% | — | ×1.150 | 9.90% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.97% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 4.97% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.36 → 5.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Reds · 47 IPFIP 3.01 → 3.75 (+0.74)K% 18.5% → 12.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.50% | — | ×0.680 | 12.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.96% | — | ×1.250 | 4.96% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.76% | ÷1.252 | ×1.400 | 1.97% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 150).
Result: FIP 3.01 → 3.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKDSL Reds · 9 IPFIP 1.39 → 2.13 (+0.74)K% 24.3% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.32% | — | ×0.680 | 16.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.70% | — | ×1.250 | 3.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.136 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 1.39 → 2.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.8 | 63 | 19.2% | 7.2% | 1.30 | 4.59 |
| Juan Carlos Oviedo ('14) | 1.9 | 56 | 18.9% | 8.0% | 1.16 | 4.28 |
| Justin Speier ('09) | 3.4 | 56 | 20.4% | 8.0% | 1.44 | 4.11 |
| J. C. Gutierrez ('07-'14, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 57 | 19.8%* | 8.5%* | 1.19* | 4.72* |
| Cris Carpenter ('88-'96, 2 WAR*) | 2.1 | 69 | 18.3%* | 7.4%* | 1.15* | 4.29* |
| Bob Patterson ('85-'98, 4 WAR*) | 3.1 | 51 | 23.0%* | 6.7%* | 1.32* | 4.33* |
| Ron Taylor ('62-'72, 3 WAR*) | 4.0 | 80 | 17.8%* | 6.8%* | 1.26* | 4.74* |