Nehomar Ochoa Jr.
OF Fayetteville Woodpeckers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | AHOU | 394 | .222/.319/.359 | 10 | 17 | 36 | — | .161/.242/.254 |
| 2025 | 20 | A/ROKHOU | 105 | .158/.231/.200 | 1 | 1 | -13 | — | .124/.183/.166 |
| 2026 | 21 | A+/A/INTL2 orgs | 340 | .271/.353/.482 | 13 | 35 | 84 | — | .227/.279/.393 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 22 | MLBHOU | 382 | .184/.243/.305 | 9 | 13 | 53 | -0.5 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 23 | MLBHOU | 68 | .192/.252/.322 | 2 | 2 | 60 | -0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ46% MLB | 24 | MLBHOU | 130 | .197/.258/.333 | 4 | 4 | 64 | -0.3 |
Tools · ContractCON 25 / POW 50
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 18 | ROK | FCL Astros | — | 42 | 36 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 222 | 317 | 528 | 845 | 306 | 185 | 17 | 7 | 359 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | INTL | Perth Heat | — | 113 | 105 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 34 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 238 | 286 | 343 | 629 | 105 | 338 | 30 | 4 | 281 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 394 | 343 | 76 | 15 | 1 | 10 | 38 | 116 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 222 | 319 | 359 | 677 | 137 | 301 | 29 | 10 | 308 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 83 | 74 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 162 | 244 | 216 | 460 | 54 | 229 | 31 | 8 | 217 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK | FCL Astros | — | 22 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 143 | 182 | 143 | 325 | 231 | 36 | 5 | 155 | -49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ | Asheville Tourists | — | 126 | 118 | 36 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 41 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 305 | 339 | 576 | 915 | 271 | 411 | 33 | 5 | 390 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 146 | 126 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 40 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 270 | 366 | 429 | 794 | 159 | 354 | 27 | 12 | 355 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | INTL | Scottsdale Scorpions | — | 68 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 200 | 353 | 400 | 753 | 200 | 273 | 29 | 15 | 342 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Astros | — | 42 | 37 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 162 | 244 | 378 | 622 | 216 | 143 | 24 | 5 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 394 | 354 | 57 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 154 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 161 | 242 | 254 | 497 | 93 | 252 | 39 | 7 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 83 | 76 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 132 | 195 | 184 | 379 | 53 | 209 | 43 | 6 | 162 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Astros | — | 22 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 136 | 95 | 232 | 197 | 55 | 5 | 96 | -49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Asheville Tourists | — | 126 | 120 | 29 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 54 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 242 | 266 | 458 | 724 | 217 | 351 | 43 | 3 | 292 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 146 | 131 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 54 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 214 | 290 | 336 | 626 | 122 | 317 | 37 | 8 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | INTL MLE | 2 teams | — | 155 | 141 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 35 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 149 | 216 | 319 | 535 | 170 | 147 | 23 | 5 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | INTL RAW | 2 teams | — | 155 | 141 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 41 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 234 | 294 | 390 | 684 | 156 | 296 | 26 | 5 | 302 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 394 | 354 | 57 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 154 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 161 | 242 | 254 | 497 | 93 | 256 | 39 | 7 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A RAW | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 394 | 343 | 76 | 15 | 1 | 10 | 38 | 116 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 222 | 319 | 359 | 677 | 137 | 301 | 29 | 10 | 308 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 105 | 98 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 122 | 173 | 163 | 336 | 41 | 216 | 45 | 5 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 105 | 95 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 34 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 158 | 231 | 200 | 431 | 42 | 230 | 32 | 8 | 204 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 340 | 312 | 70 | 16 | 1 | 11 | 20 | 135 | 5 | 35 | 3 | 224 | 282 | 388 | 670 | 163 | 349 | 40 | 6 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A RAW | 3 teams | — | 340 | 299 | 81 | 18 | 3 | 13 | 33 | 101 | 5 | 35 | 3 | 271 | 353 | 482 | 835 | 211 | 362 | 30 | 10 | 365 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | INTL MLE | 2 teams | — | 155 | 142 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 35 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 148 | 216 | 317 | 533 | 169 | 143 | 23 | 5 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 394 | 353 | 57 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 154 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 161 | 242 | 255 | 497 | 93 | 252 | 39 | 7 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 105 | 98 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 122 | 173 | 163 | 336 | 41 | 206 | 45 | 5 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 340 | 312 | 70 | 16 | 1 | 11 | 20 | 135 | 5 | 35 | 3 | 224 | 282 | 388 | 670 | 163 | 333 | 40 | 6 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 394 | 353 | 57 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 27 | 154 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 161 | 242 | 255 | 497 | 93 | 252 | 39 | 7 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 105 | 98 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 122 | 173 | 163 | 336 | 41 | 206 | 45 | 5 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 340 | 312 | 70 | 16 | 1 | 11 | 20 | 135 | 5 | 35 | 3 | 224 | 282 | 388 | 670 | 163 | 333 | 40 | 6 | 280 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB MLE | HOU | 0% | 382 | 352 | 65 | 13 | 1 | 9 | 23 | 139 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 184 | 243 | 305 | 549 | 121 | 269 | 36 | 6 | 247 | 53 | -21 | +2 | +0 | -2 | +8 | -0.5 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | HOU | 34% | 199 | 183 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 70 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 190 | 251 | 320 | 571 | 130 | 271 | 35 | 6 | 256 | 60 | -10 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.6 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | HOU | 46% | 281 | 258 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 18 | 97 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 195 | 256 | 331 | 587 | 136 | 273 | 35 | 6 | 263 | 64 | -12 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +6 | -0.7 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | HOU | 34% | 68 | 63 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 192 | 252 | 322 | 575 | 130 | 276 | 35 | 6 | 258 | 60 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | HOU | 46% | 130 | 120 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 45 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 197 | 258 | 333 | 591 | 135 | 278 | 35 | 6 | 265 | 64 | -6 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 198 | 183 | 36 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 69 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 197 | 254 | 333 | 587 | 137 | 275 | 35 | 6 | 262 | 52 | -9 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +4 | -0.5 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 601 | 119 | 23 | 0 | 20 | 39 | 227 | 7 | 20 | 3 | 198 | 255 | 336 | 591 | 138 | 277 | 35 | 6 | 262 | 52 | -29 | +3 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1636 | 1495 | 273 | 55 | 4 | 42 | 99 | 597 | 29 | 79 | 14 | 183 | 247 | 309 | 556 | 126 | 266 | 36 | 6 | 245 | 52 | -31 | +3 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 594 | 109 | 22 | 2 | 17 | 39 | 237 | 12 | 31 | 6 | 184 | 248 | 313 | 561 | 130 | 267 | 36 | 6 | 245 | 52 | -31 | +3 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AFayetteville Woodpeckers · 146 PAwOBA .349 → .270 (−78)K% 27.4% → 37.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.40% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 8.15% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.37% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.08% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.91% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.988 | ×1.015 | 25.76% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.988 | ×1.015 | 4.84% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.988 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 4.72% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.
Result: wOBA .349 → .270; ISO .159 → .118; BABIP .354 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Asheville Tourists · 126 PAwOBA .384 → .292 (−92)K% 32.5% → 42.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.54% | ÷1.000 | ×1.310 | — | — | 42.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.027 | 2.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.870 | ×1.009 | ×1.027 | 19.91% |
| Doubles /BIP | 15.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | ×1.009 | ×1.027 | 12.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.009 | ×1.027 | 1.14% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.79% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.027 | 7.04% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.
Result: wOBA .384 → .292; ISO .271 → .209; BABIP .411 → .351. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AFayetteville Woodpeckers · 83 PAwOBA .215 → .162 (−53)K% 31.3% → 42.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.33% | ÷0.996 | ×1.360 | — | — | 42.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.43% | ÷1.072 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 5.59% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.20% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.97% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.83% | ÷0.979 | ×0.920 | ×0.963 | ×1.030 | 19.42% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.08% | ÷1.035 | ×0.830 | ×0.963 | ×1.030 | 1.66% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.953 | ×0.910 | ×0.963 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.08% | ÷1.005 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 1.71% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 101, 1B 96, 2B 107, 3B 91, K 99, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.
Result: wOBA .215 → .162; ISO .054 → .039; BABIP .229 → .209. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Astros · 22 PAwOBA .151 → .096 (−56)K% 36.4% → 53.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 36.36% | ÷0.984 | ×1.440 | — | — | 53.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.55% | ÷0.992 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 2.83% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷0.956 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.995 | 19.69% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.982 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.030 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.023 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 91, 2B 96, 3B 106, K 97, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .151 → .096; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .231 → .197. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AFayetteville Woodpeckers · 394 PAwOBA .302 → .221 (−81)K% 29.4% → 39.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.44% | ÷1.020 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.64% | ÷1.024 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.045 | 6.79% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.79% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.045 | 2.28% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.03% | ÷1.038 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.045 | 19.38% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.61% | ÷1.132 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×1.045 | 4.81% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.44% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.045 | 0.44% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.41% | ÷1.118 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.045 | 3.30% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 124, 1B 108, 2B 126, 3B 80, K 104, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .302 → .221; ISO .137 → .092; BABIP .301 → .252. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Astros · 42 PAwOBA .357 → .244 (−113)K% 16.7% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.67% | ÷1.058 | ×1.440 | — | — | 22.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.14% | ÷1.007 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 4.50% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.76% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 3.51% |
| Singles /BIP | 10.34% | ÷1.014 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.022 | 8.56% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.90% | ÷0.939 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 5.41% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 10.34% | ÷1.379 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 5.98% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 176, 1B 103, 2B 88, 3B 80, K 112, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .357 → .244; ISO .306 → .189; BABIP .185 → .143. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .