Miguel Hiraldo

Pos3B

B/TR/R

Born2000-09-05

Age (2027)26

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2024

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2022	21	A+TOR	428	.231/.280/.382	11	28	34	—	.180/.216/.288
2023	22	AATOR	354	.275/.337/.453	12	16	81	—	.243/.289/.383
2024	23	AAA/AATOR	251	.220/.289/.278	1	13	38	—	.198/.253/.245

Contract

No contract data on file.

Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2024 AAA

Speed57

Z-Con%36

BB%34

Max EV28

Whiff%22

Chase%14

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2018	17	ROK	GCL Blue Jays	—	279	253	76	22	3	2	24	42	1	18	6	300	363	435	798	134	352	15	9	355	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	20	A	Dunedin Blue Jays	—	453	390	97	26	4	7	51	111	5	29	5	249	343	390	733	141	323	25	11	327	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	21	A+	Vancouver Canadians	—	428	398	92	19	4	11	27	126	0	28	5	231	280	382	662	151	307	29	6	292	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	22	AA	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	354	320	88	21	0	12	26	111	4	16	5	275	337	453	790	178	380	31	7	347	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	23	AAA	Buffalo Bisons	—	83	73	15	2	0	0	7	29	2	3	1	205	293	233	526	27	333	35	8	249	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	23	AA	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	168	154	35	8	0	1	9	40	4	10	4	227	287	299	586	71	298	24	5	268	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2018	17	ROK MLE	GCL Blue Jays	—	279	262	59	16	2	2	15	61	1	18	6	225	270	324	594	99	282	22	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	20	A MLE	Dunedin Blue Jays	—	453	403	88	21	4	5	38	143	5	29	5	218	294	328	621	109	306	32	8	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	21	A+ MLE	Vancouver Canadians	—	428	406	73	11	3	9	19	169	0	28	5	180	216	288	505	108	273	39	4	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	22	AA MLE	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	354	329	80	19	0	9	17	140	4	16	5	243	289	383	672	140	377	40	5	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	23	AAA MLE	Buffalo Bisons	—	83	75	15	2	0	0	5	35	2	3	1	200	268	227	495	27	339	42	6	221	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	23	AA MLE	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	168	157	31	6	0	1	6	49	4	10	4	197	246	255	500	57	281	29	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	17	ROK MLE	GCL Blue Jays	—	279	262	59	16	2	2	15	61	1	18	6	225	270	324	594	99	285	22	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	17	ROK RAW	GCL Blue Jays	—	279	253	76	22	3	2	24	42	1	18	6	300	363	435	798	134	352	15	9	355	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	20	A MLE	Dunedin Blue Jays	—	453	403	88	21	4	5	38	143	5	29	5	218	294	328	621	109	317	32	8	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	20	A RAW	Dunedin Blue Jays	—	453	390	97	26	4	7	51	111	5	29	5	249	343	390	733	141	323	25	11	327	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	21	A+ MLE	Vancouver Canadians	—	428	406	73	11	3	9	19	169	0	28	5	180	216	288	505	108	277	39	4	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	21	A+ RAW	Vancouver Canadians	—	428	398	92	19	4	11	27	126	0	28	5	231	280	382	662	151	307	29	6	292	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	22	AA MLE	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	354	329	80	19	0	9	17	140	4	16	5	243	289	383	672	140	388	40	5	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	22	AA RAW	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	354	320	88	21	0	12	26	111	4	16	5	275	337	453	790	178	380	31	7	347	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	251	232	46	8	0	1	11	84	6	13	5	198	253	246	499	47	302	33	4	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	251	227	50	10	0	1	16	69	6	13	5	220	289	278	567	57	308	27	6	262	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	17	ROK MLE	GCL Blue Jays	—	279	261	59	16	2	2	15	61	1	18	6	226	270	326	595	100	282	22	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	20	A MLE	Dunedin Blue Jays	—	453	407	88	21	4	5	38	143	5	29	5	216	294	324	618	108	306	32	8	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	21	A+ MLE	Vancouver Canadians	—	428	406	73	11	3	9	19	169	0	28	5	180	216	288	505	108	273	39	4	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	22	AA MLE	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	354	330	80	19	0	9	17	140	4	16	5	242	289	382	670	139	377	40	5	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	251	232	46	8	0	1	11	84	6	13	5	198	253	246	499	47	300	33	4	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
2024	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	251	232	46	8	0	1	11	84	6	13	5	198	253	246	499	47	300	33	4	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1765	1632	346	75	9	26	100	597	16	104	26	212	264	317	581	105	312	34	6	254	58	-88	+10	+0	+6	+38	-3.4
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	601	128	28	3	10	37	220	6	38	10	213	266	319	585	106	313	34	6	254	58	-33	+4	+0	+2	+14	-1.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 168 PAwOBA .263 → .226 (−37)K% 23.8% → 29.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.81%	÷0.995	×1.220	—	—	29.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.36%	÷0.990	×0.700	—	×1.012	3.83%
HBP% /PA	2.38%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	2.05%
Singles /BIP	22.81%	÷1.015	×0.970	×1.013	×1.012	22.35%
Doubles /BIP	7.02%	÷1.051	×0.860	×1.013	×1.012	5.89%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.013	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.88%	÷1.145	×0.780	—	×1.012	0.60%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 129, 1B 103, 2B 110, 3B 130, K 99, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.

Result: wOBA .263 → .226; ISO .071 → .055; BABIP .298 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AAABuffalo Bisons · 83 PAwOBA .246 → .221 (−25)K% 34.9% → 41.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	34.94%	÷1.004	×1.200	—	—	41.76%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.43%	÷1.028	×0.690	—	×1.048	5.93%
HBP% /PA	2.41%	—	×0.940	—	×1.048	2.37%
Singles /BIP	29.55%	÷0.988	×0.930	×1.043	×1.048	30.41%
Doubles /BIP	4.55%	÷0.959	×0.830	×1.043	×1.048	4.30%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.043	×1.048	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.990	×0.700	—	×1.048	0.00%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 98, 2B 92, 3B 130, K 101, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.043.

Result: wOBA .246 → .221; ISO .027 → .024; BABIP .333 → .339. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 354 PAwOBA .340 → .288 (−52)K% 31.4% → 39.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.36%	÷0.967	×1.220	—	—	39.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.34%	÷1.105	×0.700	—	×1.027	4.78%
HBP% /PA	1.13%	—	×0.850	—	×1.027	0.99%
Singles /BIP	26.32%	÷1.023	×0.970	×1.049	×1.027	26.89%
Doubles /BIP	10.05%	÷0.963	×0.860	×1.049	×1.027	9.67%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.033	×0.950	×1.049	×1.027	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.74%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.027	4.60%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 105, 2B 93, 3B 107, K 93, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.049.

Result: wOBA .340 → .288; ISO .178 → .142; BABIP .380 → .377. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Vancouver Canadians · 428 PAwOBA .286 → .218 (−68)K% 29.4% → 39.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.44%	÷1.003	×1.350	—	—	39.62%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.31%	÷1.037	×0.710	—	×1.012	4.37%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.810	—	×1.012	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.32%	÷0.950	×0.910	×1.000	×1.012	20.66%
Doubles /BIP	6.99%	÷1.254	×0.830	×1.000	×1.012	4.68%
Triples /BIP	1.47%	÷0.900	×0.820	×1.000	×1.012	1.36%
Home runs /BIP	4.04%	÷0.952	×0.830	—	×1.012	3.57%

Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 90, 2B 151, 3B 80, K 101, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.

Result: wOBA .286 → .218; ISO .151 → .109; BABIP .307 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ADunedin Blue Jays · 453 PAwOBA .323 → .275 (−48)K% 24.5% → 31.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.50%	÷1.057	×1.360	—	—	31.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.26%	÷0.941	×0.690	—	×1.015	8.38%
HBP% /PA	1.10%	—	×0.780	—	×1.015	0.87%
Singles /BIP	21.51%	÷0.959	×0.920	×1.026	×1.015	21.50%
Doubles /BIP	9.32%	÷1.014	×0.830	×1.026	×1.015	7.94%
Triples /BIP	1.43%	÷1.018	×0.910	×1.026	×1.015	1.34%
Home runs /BIP	2.51%	÷1.010	×0.800	—	×1.015	2.02%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 92, 2B 103, 3B 104, K 111, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.

Result: wOBA .323 → .275; ISO .141 → .115; BABIP .323 → .306. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ROKGCL Blue Jays · 279 PAwOBA .346 → .257 (−89)K% 15.1% → 21.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.05%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	21.68%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.24%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.022	5.23%
HBP% /PA	0.36%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	0.26%
Singles /BIP	23.22%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.997	×1.022	19.41%
Doubles /BIP	10.43%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.997	×1.022	7.65%
Triples /BIP	1.42%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.997	×1.022	1.04%
Home runs /BIP	0.95%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.022	0.76%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.

Result: wOBA .346 → .257; ISO .134 → .096; BABIP .352 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).