Loidel Chapelli
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 20 | ROKCWS | 183 | .344/.448/.636 | 8 | 10 | 69 | — | .190/.279/.319 |
| 2023 | 21 | A+CWS | 466 | .254/.364/.411 | 10 | 26 | 55 | — | .185/.266/.300 |
| 2024 | 22 | A+CWS | 328 | .233/.320/.316 | 2 | 17 | 31 | — | .179/.240/.246 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20 | ROK | DSL White Sox | — | 183 | 154 | 53 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 27 | 22 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 344 | 448 | 636 | 1.084 | 292 | 363 | 12 | 15 | 466 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 466 | 394 | 100 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 61 | 115 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 254 | 364 | 411 | 775 | 157 | 330 | 25 | 13 | 347 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 328 | 288 | 67 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 86 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 233 | 320 | 316 | 636 | 83 | 322 | 26 | 10 | 292 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL White Sox | — | 183 | 163 | 31 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 27 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 190 | 279 | 319 | 598 | 129 | 215 | 15 | 10 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 466 | 416 | 77 | 14 | 5 | 8 | 39 | 159 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 185 | 266 | 300 | 567 | 115 | 264 | 34 | 8 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 328 | 301 | 54 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 118 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 179 | 240 | 246 | 486 | 66 | 277 | 36 | 6 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL White Sox | — | 183 | 163 | 31 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 27 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 190 | 279 | 319 | 598 | 129 | 211 | 15 | 10 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL White Sox | — | 183 | 154 | 53 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 27 | 22 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 344 | 448 | 636 | 1.084 | 292 | 363 | 12 | 15 | 466 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 466 | 416 | 77 | 14 | 5 | 8 | 39 | 159 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 185 | 266 | 300 | 567 | 115 | 273 | 34 | 8 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ RAW | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 466 | 394 | 100 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 61 | 115 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 254 | 364 | 411 | 775 | 157 | 330 | 25 | 13 | 347 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 328 | 301 | 54 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 118 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 179 | 240 | 246 | 486 | 66 | 284 | 36 | 6 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ RAW | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 328 | 288 | 67 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 86 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 233 | 320 | 316 | 636 | 83 | 322 | 26 | 10 | 292 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL White Sox | — | 183 | 161 | 31 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 27 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 193 | 279 | 323 | 602 | 130 | 215 | 15 | 10 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 466 | 417 | 77 | 14 | 5 | 8 | 39 | 159 | 7 | 26 | 6 | 185 | 266 | 300 | 566 | 115 | 264 | 34 | 8 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 328 | 301 | 54 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 118 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 179 | 240 | 246 | 486 | 66 | 277 | 36 | 6 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 328 | 301 | 54 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 118 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 179 | 240 | 246 | 486 | 66 | 277 | 36 | 6 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 977 | 880 | 162 | 26 | 12 | 13 | 77 | 304 | 13 | 53 | 15 | 184 | 260 | 285 | 545 | 101 | 262 | 31 | 8 | 242 | 50 | -58 | +5 | +0 | -6 | +21 | -3.9 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 585 | 108 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 51 | 202 | 9 | 35 | 10 | 185 | 260 | 287 | 548 | 103 | 262 | 31 | 8 | 242 | 50 | -39 | +3 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 328 PAwOBA .286 → .214 (−72)K% 26.2% → 36.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.22% | ÷0.952 | ×1.310 | — | — | 36.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.06% | ÷1.006 | ×0.600 | — | ×0.998 | 5.99% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.22% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.998 | 0.94% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.75% | ÷0.972 | ×0.870 | ×0.995 | ×0.998 | 22.01% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.94% | ÷1.070 | ×0.780 | ×0.995 | ×0.998 | 4.30% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.49% | ÷0.929 | ×0.850 | ×0.995 | ×0.998 | 1.35% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.99% | ÷0.817 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.998 | 1.06% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 63, 1B 94, 2B 114, 3B 86, K 90, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.995.
Result: wOBA .286 → .214; ISO .083 → .066; BABIP .322 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 466 PAwOBA .342 → .250 (−91)K% 24.7% → 34.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.68% | ÷0.948 | ×1.310 | — | — | 34.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.09% | ÷0.943 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.012 | 8.43% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.50% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.012 | 1.17% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.94% | ÷1.011 | ×0.870 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 18.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.17% | ÷1.030 | ×0.780 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 5.22% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.15% | ÷1.008 | ×0.850 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 1.74% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.58% | ÷1.017 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.012 | 3.14% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 102, 2B 106, 3B 102, K 90, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .342 → .250; ISO .157 → .121; BABIP .330 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 DSLDSL White Sox · 183 PAwOBA .453 → .270 (−183)K% 12.0% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.02% | ÷0.987 | ×1.220 | — | — | 14.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.21% | ÷1.009 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.975 | 9.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.09% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.975 | 0.75% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.48% | ÷1.017 | ×0.680 | ×0.976 | ×0.975 | 14.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.30% | ÷1.005 | ×0.600 | ×0.976 | ×0.975 | 3.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 5.30% | ÷0.979 | ×0.600 | ×0.976 | ×0.975 | 3.09% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.06% | ÷1.218 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.975 | 2.28% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 144, 1B 103, 2B 101, 3B 96, K 97, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 18.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .453 → .270; ISO .292 → .143; BABIP .363 → .215. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).