Ryan Weingartner
SS Palm Beach Cardinals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21 | ASTL | 90 | .145/.330/.174 | 0 | 5 | 22 | — | .122/.261/.149 |
| 2026 | 22 | A+/ASTL | 434 | .220/.361/.364 | 12 | 36 | 59 | — | .176/.285/.283 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBSTL | 501 | .193/.295/.305 | 10 | 14 | 73 | 0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 24 | MLBSTL | 109 | .198/.298/.312 | 2 | 3 | 77 | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBSTL | 176 | .201/.300/.319 | 4 | 5 | 79 | 0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 36 / POW 45
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 90 | 69 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 26 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 145 | 330 | 174 | 503 | 29 | 227 | 29 | 20 | 256 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ | Peoria Chiefs | — | 52 | 44 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 182 | 308 | 227 | 535 | 45 | 258 | 25 | 15 | 261 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 382 | 310 | 70 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 63 | 84 | 7 | 33 | 8 | 226 | 368 | 384 | 752 | 158 | 269 | 22 | 16 | 344 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 90 | 74 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 35 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 122 | 261 | 149 | 410 | 27 | 212 | 39 | 14 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | Peoria Chiefs | — | 52 | 46 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 152 | 250 | 196 | 446 | 43 | 233 | 33 | 12 | 205 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 382 | 329 | 59 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 44 | 114 | 7 | 33 | 8 | 179 | 289 | 295 | 584 | 116 | 235 | 30 | 12 | 263 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 90 | 74 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 35 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 122 | 261 | 149 | 410 | 27 | 225 | 39 | 14 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 90 | 69 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 26 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 145 | 330 | 174 | 503 | 29 | 227 | 29 | 20 | 256 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 434 | 376 | 65 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 49 | 131 | 7 | 36 | 8 | 173 | 280 | 277 | 557 | 104 | 235 | 30 | 11 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 434 | 354 | 78 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 71 | 97 | 7 | 36 | 8 | 220 | 361 | 364 | 726 | 144 | 267 | 22 | 16 | 334 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 90 | 76 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 35 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 118 | 261 | 145 | 406 | 26 | 212 | 39 | 14 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 434 | 375 | 65 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 49 | 131 | 7 | 36 | 8 | 173 | 280 | 277 | 557 | 104 | 235 | 30 | 11 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | — | 90 | 76 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 35 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 118 | 261 | 145 | 406 | 26 | 212 | 39 | 14 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 434 | 375 | 65 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 49 | 131 | 7 | 36 | 8 | 173 | 280 | 277 | 557 | 104 | 235 | 30 | 11 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | STL | 0% | 501 | 433 | 84 | 15 | 2 | 10 | 57 | 131 | 6 | 14 | 4 | 193 | 295 | 305 | 600 | 112 | 249 | 26 | 11 | 276 | 73 | -16 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +11 | 0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | STL | 30% | 363 | 315 | 63 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 41 | 94 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 198 | 298 | 316 | 613 | 118 | 252 | 26 | 11 | 282 | 77 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +8 | 0.3 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | STL | 44% | 399 | 347 | 70 | 13 | 2 | 9 | 45 | 102 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 201 | 300 | 323 | 623 | 122 | 255 | 26 | 11 | 285 | 79 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +9 | 0.4 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | STL | 51% | 422 | 367 | 75 | 14 | 2 | 9 | 47 | 107 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 203 | 301 | 327 | 628 | 124 | 256 | 25 | 11 | 287 | 80 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +9 | 0.5 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | STL | 52% | 430 | 375 | 77 | 14 | 2 | 10 | 47 | 109 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 204 | 301 | 329 | 630 | 125 | 258 | 25 | 11 | 287 | 81 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +5 | +9 | 0.5 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | STL | 53% | 428 | 375 | 77 | 14 | 2 | 10 | 46 | 109 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 205 | 300 | 328 | 628 | 124 | 259 | 25 | 11 | 287 | 80 | -10 | +1 | -1 | +5 | +9 | 0.4 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | STL | 57% | 419 | 367 | 75 | 14 | 2 | 9 | 45 | 108 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 202 | 297 | 322 | 620 | 120 | 258 | 26 | 11 | 283 | 78 | -11 | +1 | -1 | +4 | +9 | 0.2 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | STL | 60% | 408 | 357 | 71 | 13 | 2 | 8 | 44 | 106 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 199 | 294 | 315 | 609 | 115 | 256 | 26 | 11 | 279 | 75 | -12 | +0 | -2 | +4 | +9 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | STL | 30% | 109 | 95 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 28 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 198 | 298 | 312 | 610 | 114 | 254 | 26 | 11 | 280 | 77 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | 0.1 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | STL | 44% | 176 | 152 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 20 | 45 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 201 | 300 | 319 | 619 | 118 | 256 | 26 | 11 | 284 | 79 | -4 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +4 | 0.2 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | STL | 51% | 214 | 186 | 37 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 54 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 203 | 301 | 323 | 624 | 120 | 258 | 25 | 11 | 285 | 80 | -5 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +5 | 0.3 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | STL | 52% | 225 | 196 | 41 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 57 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 204 | 301 | 325 | 626 | 121 | 259 | 25 | 11 | 286 | 81 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +5 | 0.3 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | STL | 53% | 228 | 199 | 41 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 58 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 205 | 300 | 325 | 625 | 120 | 261 | 25 | 11 | 285 | 80 | -5 | +1 | -0 | +2 | +5 | 0.2 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | STL | 57% | 239 | 209 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 61 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 202 | 297 | 319 | 616 | 117 | 259 | 26 | 11 | 282 | 78 | -6 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +5 | 0.1 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | STL | 60% | 243 | 213 | 43 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 63 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 199 | 294 | 312 | 606 | 112 | 258 | 26 | 11 | 278 | 75 | -7 | +0 | -1 | +3 | +5 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1434 | 1250 | 254 | 49 | 6 | 30 | 158 | 366 | 13 | 32 | 8 | 203 | 299 | 324 | 623 | 121 | 260 | 26 | 11 | 283 | 75 | -37 | +3 | -2 | +15 | +31 | 1.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 567 | 116 | 22 | 3 | 14 | 72 | 166 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 205 | 301 | 328 | 629 | 123 | 262 | 26 | 11 | 283 | 75 | -17 | +1 | -1 | +7 | +14 | 0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3603 | 3135 | 617 | 109 | 17 | 76 | 401 | 956 | 40 | 111 | 32 | 197 | 296 | 315 | 611 | 118 | 255 | 27 | 11 | 278 | 75 | -80 | +6 | -4 | +33 | +67 | 2.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 566 | 112 | 20 | 3 | 14 | 72 | 172 | 7 | 20 | 6 | 198 | 296 | 318 | 614 | 120 | 256 | 26 | 11 | 278 | 75 | -17 | +1 | -1 | +7 | +14 | 0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 APalm Beach Cardinals · 382 PAwOBA .338 → .263 (−75)K% 22.0% → 29.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.99% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | — | 11.38% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.83% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.43% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.979 | — | 18.32% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.87% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.979 | — | 3.95% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.44% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.979 | — | 0.39% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.31% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | — | 4.25% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.
Result: wOBA .338 → .263; ISO .158 → .123; BABIP .269 → .235. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Peoria Chiefs · 52 PAwOBA .256 → .205 (−51)K% 25.0% → 31.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 31.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 11.05% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 18.02% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.45% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.012 | 5.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .256 → .205; ISO .045 → .036; BABIP .258 → .233. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 APalm Beach Cardinals · 90 PAwOBA .254 → .201 (−53)K% 28.9% → 39.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.89% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 39.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 20.00% | ÷0.988 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 14.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.11% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.88% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.93% | ÷0.995 | ×0.920 | ×0.986 | ×1.015 | 19.38% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.896 | ×0.830 | ×0.986 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.33% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.986 | ×1.015 | 2.35% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.973 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 99, 2B 79, 3B 80, K 100, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.
Result: wOBA .254 → .201; ISO .029 → .028; BABIP .227 → .212. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).